What is it with people and "old news"....If it's relevant then what's the problem???...SMFH
edit: I love how "people" downvote" thinking it hurts.....I don't give a damm about votes....so keep them downvotes coming....
Because people who saw it mo the ago may get hope that it's another fissure in the damn and no just repeating something that a non-FDA doctor presented at an open forum half a year ago.
Label it as such or mention it. For the rest of us who keep up with things, stuff like this is a pain in the ass while everyone else who makes a post keeps it current (or have someone in the comments call it out.)
Usually are posting old news,, and falsely at that as this was not FDA saying it, rather a doctor in an open forum held by FDA. So you post old news and post it under false pretenses.
That's what pisses me off. Whether it's old news or brand spanking new doesn't matter much to me, however the story isn't accurate. It wasn't accurate then, and it isn't now.
Kirsch offered up this info. FDA did nothing of the sort
What is it with people and "old news"....If it's relevant then what's the problem???...SMFH edit: I love how "people" downvote" thinking it hurts.....I don't give a damm about votes....so keep them downvotes coming....
Because people who saw it mo the ago may get hope that it's another fissure in the damn and no just repeating something that a non-FDA doctor presented at an open forum half a year ago.
Not Everyone sees all at the same time....when are you going to realise that fact.....
It's fine posting something again, its not cool to not tell people it's old news. It's as simple as adding the date.
Then don't present it as new and put a disclaimer on it that it's old.
If you used your God given brain, you could have figured that out in the first 20 second's.....
Label it as such or mention it. For the rest of us who keep up with things, stuff like this is a pain in the ass while everyone else who makes a post keeps it current (or have someone in the comments call it out.)
Usually are posting old news,, and falsely at that as this was not FDA saying it, rather a doctor in an open forum held by FDA. So you post old news and post it under false pretenses.
When are you gonna understand that?
Because this wasnt the FDA saying these things. It was a random ass caller into an FFA meeting who made these claims with no source. NOT THE FDA.
That's what pisses me off. Whether it's old news or brand spanking new doesn't matter much to me, however the story isn't accurate. It wasn't accurate then, and it isn't now.
Kirsch offered up this info. FDA did nothing of the sort