I wish just once, in an interview or something, preferably live, there would be someone there to ask this degenerate filth if he was going to stop eating meat as well, and give up all of his property ownership.
He’s not technically correct on any point. Cattle contributes extremely, extremely little to “climate change”, even if you believe it’s a problem (it isn’t).
Property isn’t going away; you’ll just be renting it. That means it’ll still be “contributing” to “climate change”.
I would if I eve saw the freak. No “Sir”, nor respectful addressing him, just “hey you!” Where do you get off telling us how to live? You are such a hypocrite!”
I wish just once, in an interview or something, preferably live, there would be someone there to ask this degenerate filth if he was going to stop eating meat as well, and give up all of his property ownership.
Or just pop him. Like in Minecraft.
Or present an alternative solution.
He is technically correct. Or are your emotions foo cloudy to let you see that?
He’s not technically correct on any point. Cattle contributes extremely, extremely little to “climate change”, even if you believe it’s a problem (it isn’t). Property isn’t going away; you’ll just be renting it. That means it’ll still be “contributing” to “climate change”.
Nobody talking about climate change.
Just to be clear you think Klaus is correct? Really hoping I understood you wrong.
What is technically correct about what he says?
What is an alternative solution that a dedicated Globalist/Marxist would accept or entertain?
You're asking me to try to give Charles Manson an acceptable alternative to Helter Skelter. It doesn't work that way with those types.
You must be new here 😂
Save the typo, he is correct in regards to unchecked population growth.
I imagine you folks think he was the guy in the photo on the beach.
And not to some “foundation”
I would if I eve saw the freak. No “Sir”, nor respectful addressing him, just “hey you!” Where do you get off telling us how to live? You are such a hypocrite!”