Tbis does not really mean that he did not plead guilty. Granted, he may have. But, from the error it could still be true. So now we wait and see if it pops up again with correct case number or corrected documentation. Thats an odd thing to have an error on.
Publishing the transcript was an error but I doubt that the content of the transcript, which was presented in the notice of correction as a sentencing hearing, was an error.
So if it was a sentencing hearing it was preceded by a conviction.
Making sure this gets stickied to counter yesterday's sticky with this erroneous news. Fog of information war is real.
Tbis does not really mean that he did not plead guilty. Granted, he may have. But, from the error it could still be true. So now we wait and see if it pops up again with correct case number or corrected documentation. Thats an odd thing to have an error on.
Publishing the transcript was an error but I doubt that the content of the transcript, which was presented in the notice of correction as a sentencing hearing, was an error. So if it was a sentencing hearing it was preceded by a conviction.
Are we supposed to just take her word for it? Even erroneous entries have truth to them.
This is is a research board, so, perhaps you can answer that question
Hehe