It’s crazy on my drive I pass a 5G tower and every time I get within 1/4 of mile I start feeling nauseous- until I get about a mile away from it. It took a while for me to put it together & now I say just a little farther and it will pass. Scary what they are doing.
5G Harms Humans, Animals, Plants, Landmark Study Shows
In the race for hyperfast internet speed and connectivity, experts are making comparisons between the release of 5G and the lies told by the tobacco and oil industries. by Dr. Joseph Mercola November 3, 2021
Thanks for the link. I read the article but it doesn't have any actual scientific studies listed that demonstrate any negative affects from EMFs, only words like 'might cause problems, or likely result in..." Lots of buzz words for emotion, but the article is very light on factual evidence.
This video looks familiar. I think I saw it or at least very similar ones when these claims were peddled via 4g scare stories.
Causing effects via broadcast EM (as opposed to directed EM) is very hard because of the inverse square law. If you are within about a meter of the transmitter, you could receive enough energy to cause DNA changes. If specifically directed and attuned, you could probably do it to alter specific genes. I haven't seen this level ofanipulation, though, and it would have to be directed EM.
If you think about nano particles or nanomachines, an antenna for 3/4/5g couldn't generate enough energy to supply those particles or machines what they need to do any dirty work, either. They would first have to overcome the thermal inertia in the saline brine solution that is our biology.
The 3/4/5g is there for surveillance via iot, not as a direct method of control or poisonong. That's done through social pressure, mantra conditioning, and chemical injections.
The sun absolutely saturates us in EMF. You are exposed to more increased EMF on a six hour plane ride than what you experience in a year in an American urban setting.
Climbing to an elevated city a mile from sea level more than doubles average urban exposure. We wouldnt be able to have a Denver, or Vail, or anything as a settlement at elevation of We were unable to protect ourselves from it.
Inverse square law reins supreme in this space. God didn’t make a mistake when he established the pjysics we are bound to. We are simply too far from the various transmitters to be harmed by them and most of them (e.g. your home wifi transmitter) are simply too low power to overcome our body's protection. And, if the EMF was additive to other EMF to somehow overpower our bodies, it wouldn't function for our devices, either.
Fear of technology based on EMF is controlled agitprop. It's designed to divide and make you fear the wrong things. For instance, look at the damage that repetive low-pressure waves can do to mammals (and birds) and then look at windmills. That would be far more effective at passively hurting a population than widespread broadcast EMF could ever hope to be.
This isn't about the suns radiation, is about millimetre length RF which will be highly concentrated into our homes and workplaces by beamforming.
Nobody knows what the effects will be over a period of years so this is a radiological experiment on us which is in contravention of the Nuremburg Code of 1947.
This code carries with it the death penalty and the defence of "only following orders" is invalid.
The sun emits that same wavelength of radiation, in addition to all of the other radiation it emits. And it does so 24/7.
Beamforming means that they'd be directing that transmission AWAY from your body so that it clearly hits your wifi station and has minimal interference.
My eyes tell me the birds are not attacking - because there are no attacks in the video. I really want to win over my friends and family to content they can only find on GW.win or on cozy.tv, for example. But they will always point to obscure posts like this one about 5g towers to discredit the whole thing, and throw the baby out with the bathwater. We have to win - and being so certain that the clip above is a boa fide video of birds being aware of the dangers of 5g towers does not help us do that.
"Why didn't I think of that?" ___ Alfred Hitchcock
That’s very sad
It’s crazy on my drive I pass a 5G tower and every time I get within 1/4 of mile I start feeling nauseous- until I get about a mile away from it. It took a while for me to put it together & now I say just a little farther and it will pass. Scary what they are doing.
https://noqreport.com/2021/11/03/5g-harms-humans-animals-plants-landmark-study-shows/
Interesting. But why would government drones be attacking the government's 5G towers. Are they in a civil war?
Meant this as a joke. At least I think I did.
That’s not how birds attack. They usually swoop in at high speed, attack, fly away, rinse repeat.
It looks like they want the loose wires/ cables dangling there for nest building eh. Can see them pull on it and all.
IF 5G is so dangerous, how come the birds aren't dying from being so close to the transmitters?
Death may not be instantaneous.
5G Harms Humans, Animals, Plants, Landmark Study Shows In the race for hyperfast internet speed and connectivity, experts are making comparisons between the release of 5G and the lies told by the tobacco and oil industries. by Dr. Joseph Mercola November 3, 2021
https://noqreport.com/2021/11/03/5g-harms-humans-animals-plants-landmark-study-shows/
Thanks for the link. I read the article but it doesn't have any actual scientific studies listed that demonstrate any negative affects from EMFs, only words like 'might cause problems, or likely result in..." Lots of buzz words for emotion, but the article is very light on factual evidence.
Maybe it goes through intervals of different frequencies or peak times and this moment is not one that they are being overtly attacked.
This video looks familiar. I think I saw it or at least very similar ones when these claims were peddled via 4g scare stories.
Causing effects via broadcast EM (as opposed to directed EM) is very hard because of the inverse square law. If you are within about a meter of the transmitter, you could receive enough energy to cause DNA changes. If specifically directed and attuned, you could probably do it to alter specific genes. I haven't seen this level ofanipulation, though, and it would have to be directed EM.
If you think about nano particles or nanomachines, an antenna for 3/4/5g couldn't generate enough energy to supply those particles or machines what they need to do any dirty work, either. They would first have to overcome the thermal inertia in the saline brine solution that is our biology.
The 3/4/5g is there for surveillance via iot, not as a direct method of control or poisonong. That's done through social pressure, mantra conditioning, and chemical injections.
I don't believe the EMFs are safe. They are trying to kill us in every way imaginable.
The sun absolutely saturates us in EMF. You are exposed to more increased EMF on a six hour plane ride than what you experience in a year in an American urban setting.
Climbing to an elevated city a mile from sea level more than doubles average urban exposure. We wouldnt be able to have a Denver, or Vail, or anything as a settlement at elevation of We were unable to protect ourselves from it.
Inverse square law reins supreme in this space. God didn’t make a mistake when he established the pjysics we are bound to. We are simply too far from the various transmitters to be harmed by them and most of them (e.g. your home wifi transmitter) are simply too low power to overcome our body's protection. And, if the EMF was additive to other EMF to somehow overpower our bodies, it wouldn't function for our devices, either.
Fear of technology based on EMF is controlled agitprop. It's designed to divide and make you fear the wrong things. For instance, look at the damage that repetive low-pressure waves can do to mammals (and birds) and then look at windmills. That would be far more effective at passively hurting a population than widespread broadcast EMF could ever hope to be.
This isn't about the suns radiation, is about millimetre length RF which will be highly concentrated into our homes and workplaces by beamforming.
Nobody knows what the effects will be over a period of years so this is a radiological experiment on us which is in contravention of the Nuremburg Code of 1947.
This code carries with it the death penalty and the defence of "only following orders" is invalid.
The sun emits that same wavelength of radiation, in addition to all of the other radiation it emits. And it does so 24/7.
Beamforming means that they'd be directing that transmission AWAY from your body so that it clearly hits your wifi station and has minimal interference.
Eh? If we are using a cell phone the beamforming will be focused on us, and if we are outdoors our home wifi is irrelevant.
And the Nuremburg code will still apply regardless of wavelengths, signal strength or wattage.
Beamforming is for better signal. Your meat sack is not conducive to better signals.
The birds are landing on the tower. They are not "attacking" anything.
Birds also land on power lines.
Are birds also against electricity?
It's posting shit like this that leftists will then use to make us look silly. This will not win over people to our side.
Trust your eyes.
My eyes tell me the birds are not attacking - because there are no attacks in the video. I really want to win over my friends and family to content they can only find on GW.win or on cozy.tv, for example. But they will always point to obscure posts like this one about 5g towers to discredit the whole thing, and throw the baby out with the bathwater. We have to win - and being so certain that the clip above is a boa fide video of birds being aware of the dangers of 5g towers does not help us do that.
God Bless. And thank you for replying.
Fren, I see and think otherwise. Peace.