This post is being made primarily in the interest of all new users and curious visitors to this place. In that there are many of the negatively-oriented variety who have blended in amongst us all in here, so to speak. This is primarily so because these ones know for a fact that all of the sneaky little tricks that they use and utilize on all of the other controlled, bought, and thoroughly manipulated forms of mass and social media simply would not work in here. And yet, it is surprisingly easy to tell these ones apart. And I'm going to tell you all just how.
It's surprisingly SIMPLE: Nearly everything they write is full of negativity, fear, hatred, fear-mongering, dooming, negative or doomsday type predictions, war-mongering, anger, rage, (covertly or overtly expressed) disappointment, and other made-up depressing shit.
In other words, if reading a post or comment makes you feel unnecessarily sad, mad, depressed, anxious, scared, panicky, hopeless, or even helpless --- congratulations, you've spotted a well blended in SHILL.
Because you see, it's not that difficult at all to pretend to be one of us. But when push comes to shove, these ones' masks come off.
So the next time you encounter absolutely any of them, ask them the following questions. And then, enjoy the free flow of salt as they struggle and squirm to answer even as much as a single question satisfactorily. For these ones are no different than your average household cockroaches or lizards, for their darkness-party ENDS the very MOMENT you turn on the LIGHT. So go switch on that light, by asking them to answer why:
QUESTION ONE: If the dark ones are truly winning, how come they STILL haven't been able to start off their dream project known as World War 3? It's been well over an entire month since that whole Ukraine madness started. You'd think someone truly powerful would've got that shit started full power by now.
QUESTION TWO: Where even are the dreaded 5G rollouts that were (well more than) supposed to be here by now? Forget globally, they haven't even been able to get that shit working locally. Doesn't look all that much like "winning" to me!
QUESTION THREE: If they were indeed that much powerful, how in the actual fuck is the Hunter Biden laptop story now mainstream instead of being hidden for good?
QUESTION FOUR: Why IS the entire world still not masked up, locked down, fully vaxxed, and thoroughly under NWO governance even after, what's it been like, 2 whole years of the whole plandemic restriction-setting and propagandas?
QUESTION FIVE: How in the world is Joe Rogan STILL walking around freely, still having a 20 million listener podcast and all, and STILL NOT cancelled by the "powerful" and "winning" commie elite?
QUESTION SIX: How the fuck were they even unable to prevent some random Tweeter from leaking the Ukraine Biolabs story? And beyond even that, how in the actual fuck did that story even become Actually. Fucking. MAINSTREAM??
"All powerful" and "winning" elite? Pfft, gimme a FUCKING break.
QUESTION SEVEN: If the elite were actually winning, why the fuck would some of the very BIGGEST paedo celebs out there upon our planet just, well --- Start. Utterly. Vanishing? And I'm not even SAYING THAT, folks --- ELON Motherfucking MUSK is.
Also, speaking of Mr. Musk, isn't it rather surprising just how much hate he's been getting on here, lately? And for what, dropping redpill bombs all over the place? Isn't that supposed to be a good thing regardless of what side he's even on? Even stranger, is that he's still getting hate even after buying that stake in Twitter. Which is super fucking surprising to me because, why the FUCK would the Black Hats have Elon buy Twitter (assuming he's working for them here), when @Jack has already been doing a supremely stellar job at the whole mass censorship and dissent-culling routine? Doesn't the very idea contradict itself? I mean, the guy banned Donald J Trump for fucksake; why would he even need a "better" replacement? Unless of course, Twitter is not just 9.2% under White Hat control, but instead, a whole ONE HUNDRED PERCENT by now.
Now, I'm not necessarily saying here that Elon Musk is a confirmed White Hat or anything, but, if he's a Black Hat, then, all of that LOGIC simply DOES NOT ADD UP. Besides, all of the liberals and commies and all of their news outlets have been busy tearing him down 24x7x366 --- and for many, many, months now. When was the last time those ones were up to any good? And, beyond even that, when was the last time people on here were in agreement with these mainstream agenda-pusher ones? So Elon Musk getting hate ON HERE for, quite literally, RED-PILLING THE ENTIRE FUCKING PLANET simply DOES NOT add up or compute for me. And neither does the idea of people on here so perfectly agreeing with the MSM and Liberal narratives --- so I must then suspect that great shilling is afoot.
Now I know for a fact that some people on here will then bring up Neuralink, which is perfectly a valid counterpoint to this all. But then hey, you know what, even Trump pushed for vaccines openly. You gonna hold him up to the exact same standards now? Or is that move then recognized as just an "act?" Pick ONE. Fucking. CHOICE.
In conclusion, BEWARE OF THOSE who are only and ONLY here to DISCOURAGE and DISSUADE you from being fully awakened and spreading the word about it. Also, BEWARE OF THOSE who are way too much in agreement with a mainstream point of view on things, and especially so when the said viewpoint is just highly, HIGHLY QUESTIONABLE (to say the very least!) Not telling you to either trust or not trust either Trump or Musk or absolutely whoever else, but be very, VERY wary of those who look all too keen on pushing a narrative, and those who use deflection, deception, and other illogical shit to push you towards doom and gloom. Because the Great Awakening is very much so ALIVE AND ACTIVE, and, dare I even say THRIVING (to say the very least!)
NO SHILL CAN STOP WHAT IS COMING.
NONE WHOSOEVER.
Enjoy the show.
WWG1WGA
I didn't say effect, I said Rights infringement.
You have a Right to your life, to your decisions, to what you inject, what you eat, what you think, what you feel. You don't have a right to infringe upon anyone else's Rights. You don't have a Right to claim you are a victim from every effect you feel is negative.
I don't know what rights a business should have. I haven't really thought about it, and it's a non-trivial thought. Instead I will ask a question. Why should we be allowed to deny people service because we don't like their life choices? It's their fucking life. Why can't we respect someone's choices, even if it's not the choices we would make? Even if we think they are terrible choices, if they aren't harming you or anyone else directly, how can you claim you have had your Rights infringed?
The idea of being a victim is so overblown and has been a key exploit of much of the world's fuckery. I mean, anyone can claim they are harmed for any action if they want to. We look with disgust as "Dem's cry at the sky because they lost the election," the "pathetic pretend victims," but in the turnaround it's, "They are forcing us to sell cakes to gay people." I suggest someone buying a cake from you is not a reasonable claim of victimhood.
I mean, you yourself show exactly this hypocrisy from one sentence to the next. Rectify:
Which is a claim of victimhood because you aren't allowed to discriminate the way you want to.
Compared with:
Which is a claim that they are inappropriately claiming victimhood because they incorrectly feel discriminated against.
In this case the gay people are the real victims, because they are being discriminated against simply because they have different beliefs, and the doctor is the victim, because they aren't allowed to believe what they want.
The only out that I see, is the doctor should have no issue calling the xit whatever the doctor wants, and the people that want cake should have their cake and eat it too. No discrimination necessary, no victims anywhere.
In this case it is the taxes that are the crime, not the use of them. All income taxes are a crime. They should never exist in any format. Taxes have been used exclusively to commit crimes since their inception over 100 years ago.
Yup, people need to see. That still is not an infringement on your rights, it is however something that must be fought against for the safety of our children. However, the real fight against that is teaching your children that it is wrong, not forcing someone else to believe what you believe.
I'm not saying you shouldn't fight it on a larger scale. In fact this is the way we unite the planet, and is exactly the reason this is all coming out in the way it is. It's going to get bigger, and all the world will speak as one voice against it. So I wouldn't worry about it too much. Regardless, it STILL isn't a rights infringement for someone to have beliefs that differ from yours, no matter how abhorrent. It becomes a rights infringement if they act on their beliefs.
There can be no thought police of any sort. People must be allowed to believe what they believe. There can be no censorship of any sort. People must be allowed to speak their beliefs. The problems come when an idea is promoted and opposing views are silenced, or otherwise not given voice. That is when fuckery occurs. That is a rights infringement (in this case it's also a 1A violation). This is the major impact of the media, promoting one voice and silencing others. THAT is the crime here, not the beliefs, no matter how abhorrent.
Who ever said you needed to turn a blind eye? Who ever said you shouldn't offer a dissention. Who ever said that actual rights infringements (AKA actual acts of child abuse taking place) shouldn't be punished with extreme prejudice? If someone comes up and starts trying to "chat up" your kid, get them sent to prison for assault.
It's a psychological (verbal) assault to actually try to entice a child to have sex. It's not an assault to espouse the belief that it is ok to do so. It's not an assault because there is no victim in that act. That is just their beliefs, even if we disagree with them.
You are afraid that if they have that belief, then they will act on it, or make other people "sick" with their beliefs. Beliefs are not a crime. They can never be a crime. You have NO RIGHT to dictate anyone else's beliefs. You have NO RIGHT to determine what a person can or can't say ("free speech" does not extend to verbal assaults as mentioned above, since that is a rights violation on the child).
So don't "turn a blind eye," but don't confuse what's a crime and what isn't. Speak out (with your Right to free speech) against these beliefs that we both agree are abhorrent. Dislike anyone who espouses those beliefs. But don't try to take away their Right to believe it, because THAT leads to the worst possible future. That leads exactly to the future that we have (hopefully) avoided.
But that's exactly what it has done, so why are you worried about it? I really think part of the problem is that you are still believing the news. Even if you aren't getting the news from MSM, what you are seeing is still only a small portion of Reality. So many people are against this shit. It is waking up tons of people. That trend will continue. There could be ONE PERSON left on the planet that is still espousing it, and if that single person gets tons of airtime, the world will think it's still the majority; because that's how media works. It is the MEDIA that is the crime!
Look less online, and more "the world around you." How many people around you are espousing pedophilia? Probably not many. I think you may be getting caught up in propaganda. The world is not what you see on the news.
But some people do have a problem with it. These people are being forced to change their speech or to accept an agreement they want no part of to make the other party happy. Your apathy to that tells me you may prioritize cohesion in society over individual rights. I'm starting to see which other aspects of communism you may admire.
Yeah. Exactly. And I'm the hypocritical one?
So what's more important to you Slyver? Individual rights or everyone getting along? Can't have it both ways.
I said the doctor should be able to call the xit whatever he wants. I said it is a violation of the doctors rights, and thus a crime, that he is being forced to call xit xer. I don't understand your protest here.
I am fairly certain you completely misunderstood me. It also is really poor form to accuse me of "admiring communism." It is imo the greatest crime against humanity imaginable. I don't understand where you are getting the thoughts you are. I think you may be looking for something, and are thus finding it, even though it isn't actually there.
I have no clue what you are implying. Did I tell you what you are allowed to believe? Did I try to take away your right to choose that?
I said you have No Right. That is a statement of fact. Your Rights end at you. You are the Sovereign of you. You are not the Sovereign of anyone else. You choosing someone else's beliefs is not within your Rights. That is in fact a violation of theirs. I said nothing about what you can believe.
On the contrary, the only way that everyone can get along is the strictest possible adherence to individual rights. It is only when we truly understand our Rights, and learn that we all have the same ones, that we can learn to respect each other.
Getting along isn't about liking each other, it is about respecting each other. Not respecting actions, respecting Rights.
I misunderstood your argument for the doctor and apologize. However, forcing someone to conduct a business transaction against their will is hardly being for individual freedom, wouldn't you say? Why do the customer's right to be served trump the business owner's right to deny service?
For example, if two consenting adults agree to have sex that is good and fine. However, if one does not consent and the act of sex is carried out it is now called rape and that is wrong.
By the way, in the case of the wedding cake example, the business owners were being commissioned to make a creative work. It wasn't just selling a premade cake to a couple of gays. Does this change your perspective of the case?
It's tricky, and I'm not sure. On the one hand, forcing someone to sell to anyone might be bad. The "Right to refuse service to anyone" does sound kind of right, so perhaps. However, I have been kicked out of grocery stores for not wearing a mask. My right to purchase food and not die of starvation was infringed because they disagreed with my beliefs about masks. So is there really a "Right to refuse service to anyone?"
The mask issue was what I had in mind when I wrote it. I'm fairly sure that refusing to sell me food because I believe masks are harmful is a violation of my Rights. I certainly felt like my rights were infringed.
I'm just not sure.
I'm don't think this applies to the above conundrum.
No, either they have the right to refuse service or they don't. What the service is is irrelevant.
Rights are not conditional. The jurisdiction of a persons Sovereignty (and thus Rights) is themselves or by extension their property. While "property" is purely a social construct, the jurisdiction of a persons Rights must still apply to a person's property since we can only truly coexist in a respectful way under a social contract that includes such property Rights (unless we grow beyond the concept, though I can't imagine how). Nevertheless, Rights are intrinsic to the person (that jurisdiction) and thus can't possibly be contingent on extrinsic circumstances.
So I guess this is a question of who's Rights are being infringed (potentially). Does the store owner have the right to refuse service based on their discrimination? Does the prospective buyer have the right to not be discriminated against?
Seriously, not sure about that one.