Here's my theory on why the cabal were so keen to roll out 5G infrastructure before the vaxxes. I've mentioned it a few times before, but it hasn't really got traction.
There are two parts to this theory, it's a binary theory for what I think is a binary weapon. Part 1 is making people susceptible, Part 2: is targetting them.
Part 1: Making people susceptible to blood clots under Ghz radiation:
This is the article I saw which kicked off this part of the theory
https://robbrownmd.com/2020/05/covid-19-blood-clots-emf/
It shows that wifi frequencies (2.45 Ghz) have a rapid and profound effect on blood cell stickiness or self assembly in a covid patient:
The second image was obtained after exposure to 10 minutes of EMF from a 2.45 GHz wifi router (at levels considered safe by international standards and well below FCC guidelines). Red blood cell stacking in the irradiated sample is easily appreciated.
See pictures 3 and 4 in the article (the blue toned blood cell pictures).
We know that the spike protein from Covid and the vax promotes clots, it's beyond any doubt for any anon here. I am pretty sure that the effect is much more marked and long lasting in the vaxxed due to the body's continual production of spike proteins. i think the clot statistics for the vax bear me out here.
It stands to reason then that if the red blood cells agglomerate in a covid patient under wifi exposure, then the efffect will be there and probably more so in a vaxxed person, and that the effect is there as long as the blood is damaged, ie, as long as the body is making spike proteins
Part 2: targetting people and causing blood clots under Ghz radiation:
Now I always wondered why the TPTB are so desperate to get 5G infrastructure rolled out to as many places as possible, certainly to my area, in as short a time as possible. The consumer drive isn't there, people do not yet need 5G and are no clamouring for it and neither is business because the applications are not there. I get that the internet of things (IOT) will allow TPTB to surveill everybody and grade them for social credit, but can't that wait until the customers are asking for it? It's self funding at that point. At the moment, somebody has to pay for it.
There are lots of people who dont' trust 5G and possible reports of masts injuring birds and bees, yet the government in this country has give 5G masts default planning permission so that they are a fait-accomplit. They really want them.
5G technology is really interesting. It uses signal processing computers to drive arrays of antenna which are timed in waveform to produce a directional beam instead of a general and wider spread beam. The reason for this is that is makes a beam connection per device and can presumably re-use radio channels in different directions and support more devices. it also means that the beam goes further because it doesn't spread out as much, like a laser pointer (although not the same).
Let Verizon explain it.
How 5G beamforming works
https://www.verizon.com/business/resources/articles/5g-beamforming-massive-mimo/
How it might be used against us
The idea is that the cabal can vax everybody and prime their body so that the their blood cells can stack up and initiate a clot under radiation from a microwave source, it is known to work at 5Ghz for example.
This is shown very clearly in the Rob Brown article in part 1 above in pictures 3 and 4 in that article (the blue toned blood cell pictures)
5G works by using a phased array to direct the beam dynamically towards the device to extend its range / reduce the inverse square effect. It does this with many devices at a time so as a transmitter it has targetted beams towards many devices. Some of these devices are held by or in the vicinity of people so it is very reasonable to assume that the tower can greatly increase the intensity towards a known device which is logged onto a 5G tower.
In practice then, if they wanted to, the telco could beam an unusually high intensity beam either cumulatively or all at once (whatever works best) at a person carrying a phone with a certain phone number, whether they are using that phone or not. If they target only some people, it takes the blame away from the 5G tower, because others are OK.
In normal operation a high intensity beam for somebody far away from a tower would presumably be reduced for somebody close, but it woudn't have to be reduced if you wanted to target them with the same high intensity beam that you would use for a more distant customer. I note our local 5G towers have huge power infrastructure. Big buzzing boxes at their base.
Further reading for techies: https://ctrfantennasinc.com/5g-antenna-array-architecture/
A directable beam to individuals which causes clots by phone number would be a cabal dream.
I have not seen this theory like this anywhere else. It is my take on things.
In summation, the Sphinx of death:
The vax and 5G could provide the means to implement deniable radio enhanced targettied clotting by device id or phone number. All the components are there, it just has to be implemnted.
Comments please
Thanks.
Have a look at the Rob Brown link in the post, specifically the 4th photo. The blood cells stack as if they were electrostatically attracted, like a line of magnets or something. The effect is there, maybe each damaged blood cell becomes differentially charged by the radio waves or something. Maybe there's a special frequency for this effect.
Blood has iron in it, which gives it the red color.
Iron is ferrous, which means it is susceptible to magnetism.
It's not surprising that the blood would behave that way.
The only way the frequency would be able to create a magnetic well that can move something of that size so precisely is if the frequency was turning something in the body INTO another mechanism which produces the field.
There's a lot of steps involved, but basically, if you want to move small things you need small waves. Big things, big waves.
Using a big wave to move a small thing would move everything around the small thing, which would make the impact on the small thing negligible.
So a big thing needs to talk to medium thing that spins a small thing that moves small things.
Big things will move all the small things evenly, so you can't be precise.
This principle is why microwaves can't move through your microwave door. The big thing encounters a ton of small things, which it moves evenly, therefore distributing the impact and nullifying the effect on the bystander standing in front of the microwave door.
In order to precisely move things around, you need to stair-step sizes.
So 5G, necessarily being really, really big waves, must have a distributor within the body to take the energy and distill it down.
The "vaccines" containing nanomachines or some other such devices could produce a receiver, but the thing would have to be about the size of the human body. If the graphene does blob up like people suggest, then this is the "antenna" which refactors the instructions tinier and tinier until even singular cells are effected.
In concept, consider trying to push water through PVC pipes. If you're trying to go straight from a 8" pipe to a 1/8" pipe, you're gonna blow your line out. You have to gradually use adapters to go from 8" to 6" to 4" to 3" to 1" to 1/2" and then finally 1/8".
Going straight to the phones seems too on-the-nose. I actually think the signal would toss around a bit, using our bodies as an antenna to contact the phone, and then back to our bodies.
So, the 5G tower sends a signal to "vaccinated" bodies, which send a signal to the phone, which intercepts the signal and transcribes it with specifics which it then sends to the rest of the body, directing the 5G frequencies as a type of transformer.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Distribution_transformer
The 5G towers supply the energy, our bodies accumulate that energy, and our phones distribute that latent energy in our bodies into finer nudges here and there.
Again, I'm not 100% on board with 5G having full capabilities to mind-control, but if it were to work, it would have to follow a scheme like I've suggested, where the frequencies are stair-stepped down in order to be precise.
The bigger the hammer, the smaller the penetration.
5G tends to use higher frequency which are smaller waves. In the same way that a microwave oven uses 2.45 GHz which precisely is absorbed by water H2O a 5G emitter, if it were operating at 60GHz would do the same but for O2 (oxygen in the air)
O2 is a smaller molecule than H2O so to "knock it about" you need a higher frequency.
propertyofUniverse marked that 5G is around 5.5mm in wavelength.
That's quite large. Microwaves are between 30cm and 1mm. Larger, but 5G is still within that range.
The wavelength of a 2.45GHz signal is 122.45 mm.
60GHz is 5mm. Still too big for oxygen.
But, if a frequency was riding that 5G wave, and you cancel out the 5G wave like noise-cancelling can, you're left only with the difference, which is the frequency riding on the 5G wave.
Which can be as small as you like.
But, because they are small, have low reach and amplitude.
You gotta boost them.
That's where phones and computer monitors could come into play. They could be used to pick up the frequency and boost it, likely by creating a feedback loop like how a stage mic picking up the speaker system screeches. Don't ask me the exact mechanism they would do this, mind you, I'm just speculating on how I'd do it such that it can't be noticed.
If you just take the raw 5G, it will be too large for a full period to go through an O2 molecule.
Cancel it out, like sine and cosine cancel out, and you're left only with the piggy-backing frequency, which could be smaller than the O2 molecule. Amp it up in a feedback loop, and Bob's your uncle, you can tune it to any molecule you please.
It's not really a direct relationship between the size of oxygen/water and the wavelength in mm that matters.
Consider, we know that the microwave oven heats water, with its 122mm wave but we also know that water molecules are a lot smaller than that. This means the relationship is not directly about size of molecule/wavelength.
The mode of action is applying a force at the natural resonant frequency of the target. So everything vibrates, and if you excite it at the same frequency you will resonate it, and make the amplitude of the vibrations grow. Like pushing a swing at just the right time makes it go higher, but if you push the swing as it is coming towards you, you will slow it down. You need to push just as it is beginning to move away from you. Same principle the 60Ghz "shoves" the oxygen molecule at just the right rate, making it take on energy. Same with water in a glass, every molecule is moving back and fourth at a certain rate, if you apply energy at a that rate (or a multiple, like pushing the swing every other swing) you can make it "swing further" which is qualitatively the same as raising its temperature, it has more energy.
Another example of resonance is when you have a flag on your car, at most speeds the flag flaps randomly, but at the right speed the flag will be torn to tatters, because every "flap" is like a whiplash effect which tears it to bits. Probably you get this so apologies if I am labouring the point.
TLDR: Its about resonant frequency not the geometric size
I looked up the highest given frequency on wiki 5G page and got 54 GHz
When I put that into radio freq to wavelength conversion page, that had a corresponding wavelengh of about 5.5mm so the wavelength is big compared to a blood cell, but not really really big. I think it's conceivable that it'll have this effect of causing them to line up
no need for this, the Rob Brown link shows that wifi (at least ) with it's 2.4Ghz causes the blood cells to stick together, no need for the phone to do anything
I'm not saying it goes to the phones, but in the direction of the phones where it will also hit people's vaxxed bodies
Microwave ovens send out waves of 30 cm to 1 mm.
5.5mm is massive by comparison. Your skin is between 0.5mm and 4mm thick. 5G could only send a pulse to your entire body, which can do damage but nothing like manipulating organs let alone cells.
Manipulating individual cells would be like trying to punch a hole in a piece of paper with a beach ball. The ball is too big. Shrink the ball down, and now you can do some damage.
There has to be an intermediary -- even something like latent waves being highjacked from other existing infrastructure. Something as innocuous as a TV monitor putting out a pulse could bridge the gap, but the logistics would be a nightmare. Wifi might be small enough to act as a bridge, but there needs to be something smaller than even it to get to cells.
I was speaking generally. Many assume the phones have been hurting us:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pqIZDIxJgXw
...
Frequencies ride on one another, waves upon waves. By matching the resonance of an existing wave, you can create cavitation points that produce their own frequencies, kinda like splitting the difference.
Noise-cancelling headphones use this premise to cancel out noise. They have a microphone that listens to ambient noise and then produce an equal but opposite frequency to cancel it out in the headphones. What's left is the difference, which is only what you want to hear from your device.
Take two frequencies, one big and one medium, oppose them, and you have a small frequency which is the difference between the two.
The big frequency alone cannot affect a small thing like a cell. You need a counter-frequency to cancel out the big only enough to leave the small difference. That difference, however, won't have enough energy to cover any significant distance, so you need a way to get IN to a system so that it can be effective -- an amplifier or a distributor, like a phone.
Does that make a little more sense?
The big waves ARE a component, but we have to find what they're using as the counter-frequency in order to produce the medium and small differential frequencies. It's a lock and key system.
Earth frequencies could be used as the big, 5G as the medium, and the difference of those cancelling out could be tuned and amplified by a phone or monitor for specific tasks at the size required to affect cells.
This whole post is based on that research that the microwaves seem to cause the red blood calls to agglomerate. I'm not trying to explain how that happens, I'm just accepting as true a priori for this theory.
If you accept that the microwaves cause the cells to clump together, given the evidence in the first link, you don't have to know exactly how the interaction happens, just that it does happen.
Do you think it happens based on that first link?
Is this the bit of the theory you don't go along with?