Here's my theory on why the cabal were so keen to roll out 5G infrastructure before the vaxxes. I've mentioned it a few times before, but it hasn't really got traction.
There are two parts to this theory, it's a binary theory for what I think is a binary weapon. Part 1 is making people susceptible, Part 2: is targetting them.
Part 1: Making people susceptible to blood clots under Ghz radiation:
This is the article I saw which kicked off this part of the theory
https://robbrownmd.com/2020/05/covid-19-blood-clots-emf/
It shows that wifi frequencies (2.45 Ghz) have a rapid and profound effect on blood cell stickiness or self assembly in a covid patient:
The second image was obtained after exposure to 10 minutes of EMF from a 2.45 GHz wifi router (at levels considered safe by international standards and well below FCC guidelines). Red blood cell stacking in the irradiated sample is easily appreciated.
See pictures 3 and 4 in the article (the blue toned blood cell pictures).
We know that the spike protein from Covid and the vax promotes clots, it's beyond any doubt for any anon here. I am pretty sure that the effect is much more marked and long lasting in the vaxxed due to the body's continual production of spike proteins. i think the clot statistics for the vax bear me out here.
It stands to reason then that if the red blood cells agglomerate in a covid patient under wifi exposure, then the efffect will be there and probably more so in a vaxxed person, and that the effect is there as long as the blood is damaged, ie, as long as the body is making spike proteins
Part 2: targetting people and causing blood clots under Ghz radiation:
Now I always wondered why the TPTB are so desperate to get 5G infrastructure rolled out to as many places as possible, certainly to my area, in as short a time as possible. The consumer drive isn't there, people do not yet need 5G and are no clamouring for it and neither is business because the applications are not there. I get that the internet of things (IOT) will allow TPTB to surveill everybody and grade them for social credit, but can't that wait until the customers are asking for it? It's self funding at that point. At the moment, somebody has to pay for it.
There are lots of people who dont' trust 5G and possible reports of masts injuring birds and bees, yet the government in this country has give 5G masts default planning permission so that they are a fait-accomplit. They really want them.
5G technology is really interesting. It uses signal processing computers to drive arrays of antenna which are timed in waveform to produce a directional beam instead of a general and wider spread beam. The reason for this is that is makes a beam connection per device and can presumably re-use radio channels in different directions and support more devices. it also means that the beam goes further because it doesn't spread out as much, like a laser pointer (although not the same).
Let Verizon explain it.
How 5G beamforming works
https://www.verizon.com/business/resources/articles/5g-beamforming-massive-mimo/
How it might be used against us
The idea is that the cabal can vax everybody and prime their body so that the their blood cells can stack up and initiate a clot under radiation from a microwave source, it is known to work at 5Ghz for example.
This is shown very clearly in the Rob Brown article in part 1 above in pictures 3 and 4 in that article (the blue toned blood cell pictures)
5G works by using a phased array to direct the beam dynamically towards the device to extend its range / reduce the inverse square effect. It does this with many devices at a time so as a transmitter it has targetted beams towards many devices. Some of these devices are held by or in the vicinity of people so it is very reasonable to assume that the tower can greatly increase the intensity towards a known device which is logged onto a 5G tower.
In practice then, if they wanted to, the telco could beam an unusually high intensity beam either cumulatively or all at once (whatever works best) at a person carrying a phone with a certain phone number, whether they are using that phone or not. If they target only some people, it takes the blame away from the 5G tower, because others are OK.
In normal operation a high intensity beam for somebody far away from a tower would presumably be reduced for somebody close, but it woudn't have to be reduced if you wanted to target them with the same high intensity beam that you would use for a more distant customer. I note our local 5G towers have huge power infrastructure. Big buzzing boxes at their base.
Further reading for techies: https://ctrfantennasinc.com/5g-antenna-array-architecture/
A directable beam to individuals which causes clots by phone number would be a cabal dream.
I have not seen this theory like this anywhere else. It is my take on things.
In summation, the Sphinx of death:
The vax and 5G could provide the means to implement deniable radio enhanced targettied clotting by device id or phone number. All the components are there, it just has to be implemnted.
Comments please
Yes this is a plausible theory, would allow targeted kills. The main drawback is that there would be a common cause, although I note that post-mortems were essentially banned in the case of covid deaths early in the pandemic, so that would fit.
Three other possibilities for the 5G:
Now add to this graphene infused people (desperate to get everyone vaxxed) and potentially this means that all humans can be pinpointed within a 4D model of an area. This would be a military wet dream bit of tech.
Using 4G to create a 3D model of an area has been demonstrated before, although I cant find info on it now, it was a while ago, and I seem to recall it was some Israeli researchers that came up with it.
I have confirmed that the 5G tech uses waveguides that are tunable +/- 10%. There was an IEEE paper on this. A nano scale piezo vibrator on silicone is used but can be deformed over nano meters using applied voltage to vary the frequency. This means that, if desired, the 5G emitters could be configured to dump all the energy they can muster into o2. This might be capable of splitting o2 into o - or monoatomic oxygen. NASA have made monoatomic oxygen generators to test space materials. It is found in the upper atmosphere and can oxidise almost anything, causing lots of damage. To organic life it is very damaging. Also called free-radicals, they can emerge in chemical processes too. Point being, a 5G drenched area MAYBE could be infused with free radicals which could damage health, with enough power kill people.
Graphene plus spike protein, does this combination create magnetically active humans, so that in an electric field of sufficient strength, the graphene could be vibrated. Graphene being essentially a 1-atom thick saw-blade. A 1atom thick knife would be the sharpest possible knife, and having them moving back and fourth in the body could cause internal bleeding and death. So its another killswitch in combination with an EMP. They could drop an EMP and kill everyone who was vaxxed in one hit.
Finally, there is the potential of hydrogel assembly of the graphene to create antenna within people, and that perhaps could be used in the brain to simple send "DREAD" signals and similar to debilitate a large number of people. In combination with a news broadcast you could frighten-to-death large numbers of vaxxed people. Covid being announced was enough to frighten people, I wondered at the time whether there were sub-audible components to those news shows. I never watch TV and I was not much frightened compared to people I know were watching the TV. This effect could be amped up with graphene aerials in peoples brains, giving direct control of brain state.
That sounds pretty interesting.
You've introduced graphene here as well, which was not in the original post. The original post pointed to susceptibility to blood clots just from the covid infection (not the vaxx) so no graphene needed in that case.
Not to say that graphene does not interact with 5G also, making another mechanism for this kind of targetted attack if people have been injected with graphene
That's another possible mechanism for an attack.
Any way in which the body is made vulnerable to 5G makes targetted beamforming attacks possible, using the persons phone as a beacon for the attack.
OK, maybe they haven't started targetting anyone yet. In any case, the common cause would be clots and since people would be targetted at will and not necessarily just because they are close to the 5G mast, people may not be able to discern the pattern with the masts
Thanks for the most interesting comment.
By the way, check out drop 777:
Hints at mind control+pharma+phones - they are linked.
Oh! Thank you for that.
Interesting question. Were they not going along with the program?
From an etymological standpoint, 'gigahertz' is quite unequivocal - 'giant heart'.
Frequency is clearly as fundamental a governing property of life - or abiosis - as physical matter and how its properties react to or with it. We can pick up the deepest 'bloop' from the darkest depth of the ocean, or the most infinitesimal blip from the farthest known reaches of space. The origins of the sound wave is the variable. Something has the hertz - heart - to be able to live deep enough under the most extreme oceanic pressure to be a transmitter. Likewise that blip from deepest space comes from a sidereal heart somewhere out there. The ability to fine-tune where we sit and act along that array logically seems beyond conceivable - yet here we now are.
They have a beam by default. 5G works like that. It's directional towards the device.
The beam can be used to selectively target a device for more radiation if required.
Very good point, the phones themselves are a 5G source right by the person. I don't know if it's as directional and it's likely to be less under control of the telcos in terms of intensity. The phones are limited in power to that which the battery can provide.
It is a beam, it's generated by signal processing to produce constructive addition of radio waves in a certain direction. It's done via an array of antennae. it's what makes 5G qualitatively different from 4G.
This is the verizon link from my post
https://www.verizon.com/business/resources/articles/5g-beamforming-massive-mimo/
The point of the post is that 5G beamforming makes targetting possible, that's why the towers appeared.
My theory is that they have the ability to target specific devices rather than just the local population in general. Of course, they could also target all handheld devices, but then people might start to blame the masts.
Calling u/Slyver , u/sleepydude, u/penisse, u/ashlanddog
Avengers assemble!
I researched a bit and I think 5G might have an opposite effect as it pertains to blood clots, at least if analogous situations have anything to say about it.
If you vibrate a solution, chonky bits and air bubbles either break up or fall out of solutions.
Now, that's in a uniform solution. It's different if we look at a system of tubes and ventricles like the human body.
Look back at what I said "fall out of solution."
It means that any blood clots that do form will all gather together -- settling at the bottom of certain organs or in the legs.
If the frequency isn't enough to break up the blood clots, it could help move them around and bunch up into large pools of bloodclots, which is potentially more dangerous.
Consider this machine:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=biBmMUXuP2I
Vibrating a combination of rocks, sands, and gravel can be used to slowly sort different sizes of material.
Do the same with blood clots, and theoretically you separate the big chunks from the small which allow steady streams of smaller blood clots to reach places that the larger chunks would have prohibited them from settling in, like capillary veins. Once lodged there, the vibrations don't matter as much, but the clots can grow larger as more is added onto the pile in the blocked capillary.
Give it a right nudge and the thing will break loose, forming a much larger clot than the body would ever expect.
Add medications and drugs into the mix that encourage micro-clotting, and you have a right recipe for turning the capillary system into a blood-clot factory.
That's my take anyway. Basically, the vibrations allow clots that normally form to get to places they should never be, then they pile up and make a big, big clot, just waiting for a final push to head toward the brain or heart.
Thanks.
Have a look at the Rob Brown link in the post, specifically the 4th photo. The blood cells stack as if they were electrostatically attracted, like a line of magnets or something. The effect is there, maybe each damaged blood cell becomes differentially charged by the radio waves or something. Maybe there's a special frequency for this effect.
Blood has iron in it, which gives it the red color.
Iron is ferrous, which means it is susceptible to magnetism.
It's not surprising that the blood would behave that way.
The only way the frequency would be able to create a magnetic well that can move something of that size so precisely is if the frequency was turning something in the body INTO another mechanism which produces the field.
There's a lot of steps involved, but basically, if you want to move small things you need small waves. Big things, big waves.
Using a big wave to move a small thing would move everything around the small thing, which would make the impact on the small thing negligible.
So a big thing needs to talk to medium thing that spins a small thing that moves small things.
Big things will move all the small things evenly, so you can't be precise.
This principle is why microwaves can't move through your microwave door. The big thing encounters a ton of small things, which it moves evenly, therefore distributing the impact and nullifying the effect on the bystander standing in front of the microwave door.
In order to precisely move things around, you need to stair-step sizes.
So 5G, necessarily being really, really big waves, must have a distributor within the body to take the energy and distill it down.
The "vaccines" containing nanomachines or some other such devices could produce a receiver, but the thing would have to be about the size of the human body. If the graphene does blob up like people suggest, then this is the "antenna" which refactors the instructions tinier and tinier until even singular cells are effected.
In concept, consider trying to push water through PVC pipes. If you're trying to go straight from a 8" pipe to a 1/8" pipe, you're gonna blow your line out. You have to gradually use adapters to go from 8" to 6" to 4" to 3" to 1" to 1/2" and then finally 1/8".
Going straight to the phones seems too on-the-nose. I actually think the signal would toss around a bit, using our bodies as an antenna to contact the phone, and then back to our bodies.
So, the 5G tower sends a signal to "vaccinated" bodies, which send a signal to the phone, which intercepts the signal and transcribes it with specifics which it then sends to the rest of the body, directing the 5G frequencies as a type of transformer.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Distribution_transformer
The 5G towers supply the energy, our bodies accumulate that energy, and our phones distribute that latent energy in our bodies into finer nudges here and there.
Again, I'm not 100% on board with 5G having full capabilities to mind-control, but if it were to work, it would have to follow a scheme like I've suggested, where the frequencies are stair-stepped down in order to be precise.
The bigger the hammer, the smaller the penetration.
5G tends to use higher frequency which are smaller waves. In the same way that a microwave oven uses 2.45 GHz which precisely is absorbed by water H2O a 5G emitter, if it were operating at 60GHz would do the same but for O2 (oxygen in the air)
O2 is a smaller molecule than H2O so to "knock it about" you need a higher frequency.
propertyofUniverse marked that 5G is around 5.5mm in wavelength.
That's quite large. Microwaves are between 30cm and 1mm. Larger, but 5G is still within that range.
The wavelength of a 2.45GHz signal is 122.45 mm.
60GHz is 5mm. Still too big for oxygen.
But, if a frequency was riding that 5G wave, and you cancel out the 5G wave like noise-cancelling can, you're left only with the difference, which is the frequency riding on the 5G wave.
Which can be as small as you like.
But, because they are small, have low reach and amplitude.
You gotta boost them.
That's where phones and computer monitors could come into play. They could be used to pick up the frequency and boost it, likely by creating a feedback loop like how a stage mic picking up the speaker system screeches. Don't ask me the exact mechanism they would do this, mind you, I'm just speculating on how I'd do it such that it can't be noticed.
If you just take the raw 5G, it will be too large for a full period to go through an O2 molecule.
Cancel it out, like sine and cosine cancel out, and you're left only with the piggy-backing frequency, which could be smaller than the O2 molecule. Amp it up in a feedback loop, and Bob's your uncle, you can tune it to any molecule you please.
It's not really a direct relationship between the size of oxygen/water and the wavelength in mm that matters.
Consider, we know that the microwave oven heats water, with its 122mm wave but we also know that water molecules are a lot smaller than that. This means the relationship is not directly about size of molecule/wavelength.
The mode of action is applying a force at the natural resonant frequency of the target. So everything vibrates, and if you excite it at the same frequency you will resonate it, and make the amplitude of the vibrations grow. Like pushing a swing at just the right time makes it go higher, but if you push the swing as it is coming towards you, you will slow it down. You need to push just as it is beginning to move away from you. Same principle the 60Ghz "shoves" the oxygen molecule at just the right rate, making it take on energy. Same with water in a glass, every molecule is moving back and fourth at a certain rate, if you apply energy at a that rate (or a multiple, like pushing the swing every other swing) you can make it "swing further" which is qualitatively the same as raising its temperature, it has more energy.
Another example of resonance is when you have a flag on your car, at most speeds the flag flaps randomly, but at the right speed the flag will be torn to tatters, because every "flap" is like a whiplash effect which tears it to bits. Probably you get this so apologies if I am labouring the point.
TLDR: Its about resonant frequency not the geometric size
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lg_aUOSLuRo
This is a good video that I watched recently which is informing me to the importance of wavelength.
Wavelengths are important, because barriers exist.
60GHz could tickle oxygen but it would be the frequencies riding on the 60GHz more than the full period doing the work. Should you manage to block the largest wavelength, all smaller ones diverge along with it.
Add in a barrier, and the wavelength just cannot penetrate deep enough, no matter the resonance. You might be able to get blood to dance to a tune out of someone's body, but if skin is in the way, you need an antenna to carry the signal internally.
Edit:
This point in particular:
https://youtu.be/Lg_aUOSLuRo?t=1564
I looked up the highest given frequency on wiki 5G page and got 54 GHz
When I put that into radio freq to wavelength conversion page, that had a corresponding wavelengh of about 5.5mm so the wavelength is big compared to a blood cell, but not really really big. I think it's conceivable that it'll have this effect of causing them to line up
no need for this, the Rob Brown link shows that wifi (at least ) with it's 2.4Ghz causes the blood cells to stick together, no need for the phone to do anything
I'm not saying it goes to the phones, but in the direction of the phones where it will also hit people's vaxxed bodies
Microwave ovens send out waves of 30 cm to 1 mm.
5.5mm is massive by comparison. Your skin is between 0.5mm and 4mm thick. 5G could only send a pulse to your entire body, which can do damage but nothing like manipulating organs let alone cells.
Manipulating individual cells would be like trying to punch a hole in a piece of paper with a beach ball. The ball is too big. Shrink the ball down, and now you can do some damage.
There has to be an intermediary -- even something like latent waves being highjacked from other existing infrastructure. Something as innocuous as a TV monitor putting out a pulse could bridge the gap, but the logistics would be a nightmare. Wifi might be small enough to act as a bridge, but there needs to be something smaller than even it to get to cells.
I was speaking generally. Many assume the phones have been hurting us:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pqIZDIxJgXw
...
Frequencies ride on one another, waves upon waves. By matching the resonance of an existing wave, you can create cavitation points that produce their own frequencies, kinda like splitting the difference.
Noise-cancelling headphones use this premise to cancel out noise. They have a microphone that listens to ambient noise and then produce an equal but opposite frequency to cancel it out in the headphones. What's left is the difference, which is only what you want to hear from your device.
Take two frequencies, one big and one medium, oppose them, and you have a small frequency which is the difference between the two.
The big frequency alone cannot affect a small thing like a cell. You need a counter-frequency to cancel out the big only enough to leave the small difference. That difference, however, won't have enough energy to cover any significant distance, so you need a way to get IN to a system so that it can be effective -- an amplifier or a distributor, like a phone.
Does that make a little more sense?
The big waves ARE a component, but we have to find what they're using as the counter-frequency in order to produce the medium and small differential frequencies. It's a lock and key system.
Earth frequencies could be used as the big, 5G as the medium, and the difference of those cancelling out could be tuned and amplified by a phone or monitor for specific tasks at the size required to affect cells.
This whole post is based on that research that the microwaves seem to cause the red blood calls to agglomerate. I'm not trying to explain how that happens, I'm just accepting as true a priori for this theory.
If you accept that the microwaves cause the cells to clump together, given the evidence in the first link, you don't have to know exactly how the interaction happens, just that it does happen.
Do you think it happens based on that first link?
Is this the bit of the theory you don't go along with?
What I'm saying is that the study is only taking into account a single source.
I don't question the conclusion, that EMF from 5G, Wifi, or what have you does cause clotting.
I'm just concerned that it has a very narrow and medical view of something potentially far more complex, even nefarious.
Studies like this are easily dismissed because they only look at the lock or they key individually and say that one or the other is the cause.
It's both. If you're gonna catch the ones pulling off this sick stuff, you need to address the full scheme.
The medical industry does this all the time. They run trials with people taking a drug, and only pick those who have a healthy diet. The drug they trial passes all the tests, so it goes to market.
People start reporting symptoms. The drug reacts with an anti-caking agent in chips. No one can make the connection.
The drug manufacturers say it isn't their drug, because those symptoms didn't come up in trials.
So, they prescribe people another medication that conveniently addresses the exact symptoms you have.
In reality, they made the drug to treat the symptoms first, pushed the first drug through trials knowing it reacted with the anti-caking agent, and then lobbied to ban the old drug that their new one is competing with.
Lock and key.
Same thing with EMF.
Put out frequencies in the world.
Test devices in situations void of those prior frequencies.
Say they are safe.
In the field, however, the two frequencies mix to create a blood-clot frequency.
There's no way to make the connection.
People will blame the device, but every test done in a vacuum absolves them of doing harm.
That's because the "poison" is composed of two components; each harmless alone, but dangerous together.
Yes, I totally accept that this is a limited source,
I'm saying that if the microwave clotting effect is real, then the cabal can now do this targetting via 5Gif they want to.
I'm saying exactly the same thing but with the 2 factors being vaxx and 5G:
One frequency (could be more than one needed for all I know) can cause clotting in a vaxxed person and i a 5G beam which has been specifically made high amplitude for that particular device used by that particular user identified by phone number causes the clot and...
There's no way to make the connection, it doesn't happen to the next person because they don't have the high targetted dose because the cabal doesn't happen to target them today.
It's conjecture from the facts given, but you can bet the cabal know if it can be done. It they think it can be done, they will be doing it
-and it would explain the whole 5G rush.