Elon Musk Is Sus
(media.greatawakening.win)
Comments (27)
sorted by:
With all due respect this is pretty dumb. This logic can be used to say any hostile takeover as "giving sudden profit to the existing shareholders", because that is what happens during a hostile takeover. It does not mean other people will start buying up at that price - aka the profits are only on paper.
The only way these profits will solidify is if they accept his subsequent takeover bid - but it means they are selling their biggest asset in the information warfare.
The fog of war is thick...so many layers.
Indeed
There is only one company in the world. They aren't "Musk's" bosses, they are everyone's bosses.
Unless Musk gets controlling interest he has no power to kick out the Board of Directors. This was not about "Musk's bosses making money." They literally own all the money in the world.
zaklee My guess is the fed prints $$$ with BlackRock nod.
BlackRock doesn't control anything without the say so of the real powers (Rothschilds, Rockefellers, Wallenbergs, etc.) BlackRock is one door to a much larger building, nothing more. Not to say Fisk doesn't earn his pay, I'm sure he does, but he works at the pleasure of the real players.
The Fed prints money when the real players say so. BlackRock is the man we see. Maybe the phone call comes from them, but they aren't the voice talking.
The point is, thinking of "Blackrock" as having any power at all, or even as being an "entity" in any singular sense is not supported by the evidence. It is a front for something much, much larger, nothing more.
Part 2 of my report will hopefully make all of this a lot more clear. It's been 8 months since part 1 but I swear I am almost done. I have stopped the investigation part and am putting it all together now. Soon...
The marriage with Vanguard is certainly telling. Rub the majik lamp and see what slithers out. I have been convinced for some years now that AI ain't new, and those of "real power" have been the beneficiaries for generations.
The entire executive branch is hand-picked. 23 of the last 27 U.S. presidents have been members of the Trilateral Commission. The Trilateral Commission is financed by the Rockefellers and the Rothschilds. It's a think tank. Anyone can become a member - but not everyone does. But not everyone does. That’s why they call it the 'secret government'.
There have not been 27 presidents since the Trilateral Commission was founded in 1973. There have only been 9.
My bad, should have been "19 of the last 23 presidents". I guess it's not 2052 or 2074 yet.
The statue of liberty still has its head attached too. Funny that.
I still hold out hope for the NSF.
But you know, future proves past!
There have only been nine presidents since the Trilateral Commission was founded. Not 23. You still have a counting problem. Not all of them have been on the Trilateral either, only a few. They have all had cabinet members that were, but the Presidents themselves have been about half.
That's just what they WANT you to think.
Corporations are so big, you don't even know who you're working for. That's terror. Terror built into the system.
People really need to learn that unrealized gains are not liquid cash
Plus it’s only an increase on paper until they sell. If he tanks the stock tomorrow by pulling out, is he still sus?
I don’t see Blackrock or Vanguard mentioned at all here: https://www.investopedia.com/articles/insights/052616/top-4-tesla-shareholders-tsla.asp
Does anyone have some sauce on the claims in the OP?
https://finance.yahoo.com/quote/tsla/holders/
I think the Investopedia article glossed over Blackrock and Vanguard since the shares are supposed to be fund managed, so they shouldn't be voting with those shares or using them for control.
Ah ha, thank you for this. I clicked that result yesterday but I think my browser must have sperged out and I didn’t realize it, that bottom section was missing on mobile for me.
Not a solid theory. BlackRock, Vanguard, et al. have their cocks in everything.
Majority or largest holder?
Majority means 51% or more
Well... It means 'more than 50%'
Since you learned to code, I know you'll appreciate the difference!
so whyd you ask?
Because people have been using majority to refer to largest holder lately. As in "musk became the majority shareholder in Twitter".
Who called Elon a Trogan whorse ?