Twitter does make money/revenue, the problem is their operating costs are highly suspect especially for a service running at this massive scale. No way can their revenue offset their reported numbers. It’s definitely subsidized somewhere along the line.
This is probably the most under-rated comment. When shit can keep thriving without making money, it means we are the products. The entire "Silicon Valley" part of the Cabal operation was about this. Companies like Twitter, Facebook, Uber, AirBNB, Amazon etc were created as fronts to launder money stolen from us through the Fed, and pumped towards enslaving us.
When I just starting, I was told by everyone that the new way in Tech is to not worry about profits but to build "user base". This sounded perfectly fine in the early phases of a Startup, but when this continued even after they IPOs and decades passed, and I found it awfully confusing that no one even bothered to talk about it and no one found this strange or disturbing.
My theory is that if you calculate the cumulative increase in capitalisation of all fortune 500 companies in the past half a century and compare it to the net profits generated by these companies, we will get an idea of just how much wealth has been stolen from us and laundered via Wall Street.
Well, they do call us chattel. We've been "products" for a long time, at least in their eyes. You remember that Robert Steele video where he says "We have it all. Make the deal motherfucker or you are going to die"?
In that, he stated wallstreet stole from mainstreet to the tune of 100 trillion. That number seems astronomical to me. I think your theory is right.
Explains perfectly how shit can make no money and still keep on goin'.
Wonder what else that's true of.
Twitter does make money/revenue, the problem is their operating costs are highly suspect especially for a service running at this massive scale. No way can their revenue offset their reported numbers. It’s definitely subsidized somewhere along the line.
Amtrak?
USPS
Was it supposed to make money when the Constitution was ratified?
A fair point.
I'm not sure, but I believe it was expected to be self-sufficient since at least the sixties...
This is probably the most under-rated comment. When shit can keep thriving without making money, it means we are the products. The entire "Silicon Valley" part of the Cabal operation was about this. Companies like Twitter, Facebook, Uber, AirBNB, Amazon etc were created as fronts to launder money stolen from us through the Fed, and pumped towards enslaving us.
When I just starting, I was told by everyone that the new way in Tech is to not worry about profits but to build "user base". This sounded perfectly fine in the early phases of a Startup, but when this continued even after they IPOs and decades passed, and I found it awfully confusing that no one even bothered to talk about it and no one found this strange or disturbing.
My theory is that if you calculate the cumulative increase in capitalisation of all fortune 500 companies in the past half a century and compare it to the net profits generated by these companies, we will get an idea of just how much wealth has been stolen from us and laundered via Wall Street.
Well, they do call us chattel. We've been "products" for a long time, at least in their eyes. You remember that Robert Steele video where he says "We have it all. Make the deal motherfucker or you are going to die"?
In that, he stated wallstreet stole from mainstreet to the tune of 100 trillion. That number seems astronomical to me. I think your theory is right.