I appreciate your reply and would like to understand your perspective.
My point of view is Chris Miller wasn’t part of President Trump’s inner circle. He really was caught off guard by the events at the Capitol. When he gave his initial human response on January 6th he was angry and lashed out at President Trump.
Later when he viewed video of the events he saw two things. The hallmarks of a false flag and the hallmarks of a counter operation that he was totally unaware was authorized. This was his confusion during the interview in what appeared to be a church.
If these observations are correct then it was Miller that was provided plausible deniability by President Trump. But clearly Miller did the opposite for the President, he did not defend Trump, he accused him and only after several weeks did he finally walk it back.
I look forward to the day when we know the truth, just not sure it will all be revealed.
If you are taking the long view and looking at patterns which the white hats use, then perhaps Trump needed to take flak over jan 6th. The public need to be coached in just how deep the treason is and they need their mind changed at a certain rate. They need each apex and nadir pointed out to them loudly.
An example of this might be Trump allowing himself to be shouted down so loudly by the MSM over "bleach" and HCQ. He'll be proven right on HCQ of course and the public will remember the mental rollercoaster ride they have been on and how the MSM cheated them of their health.
Trump never shut anything down, he left that decision to the individual states. Trump funded a vaccine to get the economy opened up, how can you blame him for that. The fact that the pharm industry turned it in to a mass depopulation event can't be blamed on Trump.
Trump is not a scientist, how was he supposed to know the ingredients they chose to put in these vaccines? The vaccine was released as a experimental drug and could not be mandated, Biden tried and he found out. Everyone who took it did so voluntarily, many of us had enough sense to stay away, far away. They tried to push it where I worked, I was willing to walk away from a 30 year career, everyone could have done the same.
I think that the fact that Trump more recently still supported the vaccines is about giving the deep state a little control. If Trump came out against the vaccines, that news would spread like wild fire, the deep state would know their only method of control was failing. At that point the deep state would have become unpredictable. There are thresholds that need to be crossed before certain information can come out. Keeping the deep state walking a certain path is how they corner them in the end.
That is sage advice, thank you. Using the chess analogy, this board is littered with extra game pieces to protect the key players and distract the enemy. Until the truth is revealed we are reduced to speculation.
I had a sixth grade social studies teacher hate what ifs so much she made us write them 1000 times if we ever mentioned it with history. That was 30 yrs ago.
My opinion is that Christopher Miller is playing the game. He was the United States Army Special Forces colonel so there is no way that he doesn't know what went down on Jan. 6th. He can't reveal his position on the matter....just my opinion.
I appreciate your reply and would like to understand your perspective.
My point of view is Chris Miller wasn’t part of President Trump’s inner circle. He really was caught off guard by the events at the Capitol. When he gave his initial human response on January 6th he was angry and lashed out at President Trump.
Later when he viewed video of the events he saw two things. The hallmarks of a false flag and the hallmarks of a counter operation that he was totally unaware was authorized. This was his confusion during the interview in what appeared to be a church.
If these observations are correct then it was Miller that was provided plausible deniability by President Trump. But clearly Miller did the opposite for the President, he did not defend Trump, he accused him and only after several weeks did he finally walk it back.
I look forward to the day when we know the truth, just not sure it will all be revealed.
If you are taking the long view and looking at patterns which the white hats use, then perhaps Trump needed to take flak over jan 6th. The public need to be coached in just how deep the treason is and they need their mind changed at a certain rate. They need each apex and nadir pointed out to them loudly.
An example of this might be Trump allowing himself to be shouted down so loudly by the MSM over "bleach" and HCQ. He'll be proven right on HCQ of course and the public will remember the mental rollercoaster ride they have been on and how the MSM cheated them of their health.
Long games.
And he will be proven very wrong in regards to the shutdown and the vaccine.
Trump never shut anything down, he left that decision to the individual states. Trump funded a vaccine to get the economy opened up, how can you blame him for that. The fact that the pharm industry turned it in to a mass depopulation event can't be blamed on Trump.
Trump is not a scientist, how was he supposed to know the ingredients they chose to put in these vaccines? The vaccine was released as a experimental drug and could not be mandated, Biden tried and he found out. Everyone who took it did so voluntarily, many of us had enough sense to stay away, far away. They tried to push it where I worked, I was willing to walk away from a 30 year career, everyone could have done the same.
I think that the fact that Trump more recently still supported the vaccines is about giving the deep state a little control. If Trump came out against the vaccines, that news would spread like wild fire, the deep state would know their only method of control was failing. At that point the deep state would have become unpredictable. There are thresholds that need to be crossed before certain information can come out. Keeping the deep state walking a certain path is how they corner them in the end.
Fauci is there to take the flak for that.
I find the best way to keep sane in the information war is to stay 40,000ft up.
I wish I had more than "you're watching a movie" but to postulate on the what-ifs is to invite circular logic into your ordered hall.
That is sage advice, thank you. Using the chess analogy, this board is littered with extra game pieces to protect the key players and distract the enemy. Until the truth is revealed we are reduced to speculation.
It's why current events are like poop and history is like manure. One is smelly, raw and putrid and the other is fertilizer that helps things grow.
I had a sixth grade social studies teacher hate what ifs so much she made us write them 1000 times if we ever mentioned it with history. That was 30 yrs ago.
My opinion is that Christopher Miller is playing the game. He was the United States Army Special Forces colonel so there is no way that he doesn't know what went down on Jan. 6th. He can't reveal his position on the matter....just my opinion.