So new mod, who didn't understand, who didn't "get" Norman, who apparently didn't think to look through account history, gives 2 day ban because they thought the intent was to impersonate Q and/or be mysterious? These are bannable offenses? That's an indicator that the account is a glowie or shill? In either case, it's a bit concerning that any mod, new or not, so prone to knee jerk judgement would continue to have the power to ban. Good to know this mod was apparently reprimanded, and it would appear that whoever "WE" is, unbanned NFD or at least did not extent the 2 day ban.
Consider this... what if NFD was actually Q or part of "Q"? Then the account's posts would not have been impersonating or attempts to mimic Q drops, but actual Q drops...
What if "GAW" isn't the outside but the inside? If NFD is [part of] "Q" then they aren't outside comms because well, derp...
You assume that NFD isn't [part of] "Q" to prove your assumption, because if your assumption is correct then NFD can't be [part of] "Q" because it'd be outside comms since NFD is not [part of] "Q", as your assumption requires... terribly illogical line of reasoning there fren...
Consider the alternative... what if you've misjudged the identity and nature of "NFD"? Or are you always right? Can you prove that "NFD" is absolutely not [part of] "Q"? How so? Do you know both entities? Can you prove it?
You asserted that TDU is NFD. Therefore the burden of proof is absolutely on you to prove your claim.
I'm not trying to piss you off. I'm simply asking questions. You're choosing how to respond to them. If you choose to get pissed off, that's your choice, but it's not evidence proving your accusation that I'm intentionally trying to piss you off. Instead of getting pissed off, perhaps better address the questions and control your emotions so that we might continue to engage in meaningful dialogue?
So new mod, who didn't understand, who didn't "get" Norman, who apparently didn't think to look through account history, gives 2 day ban because they thought the intent was to impersonate Q and/or be mysterious? These are bannable offenses? That's an indicator that the account is a glowie or shill? In either case, it's a bit concerning that any mod, new or not, so prone to knee jerk judgement would continue to have the power to ban. Good to know this mod was apparently reprimanded, and it would appear that whoever "WE" is, unbanned NFD or at least did not extent the 2 day ban.
Consider this... what if NFD was actually Q or part of "Q"? Then the account's posts would not have been impersonating or attempts to mimic Q drops, but actual Q drops...
Better not sock this guy, might be something special about him...
Just saying...
The mod was a noob and given very little guidance. That's all. I seldom respond to appeals of someone that I didn't ban.
"what if NFD was actually Q or part of "Q"?"
And what if NFD was the queen of england? No outside coms.
"might be something special about him..."
Yeah, something along those lines...
What if "GAW" isn't the outside but the inside? If NFD is [part of] "Q" then they aren't outside comms because well, derp...
You assume that NFD isn't [part of] "Q" to prove your assumption, because if your assumption is correct then NFD can't be [part of] "Q" because it'd be outside comms since NFD is not [part of] "Q", as your assumption requires... terribly illogical line of reasoning there fren...
Consider the alternative... what if you've misjudged the identity and nature of "NFD"? Or are you always right? Can you prove that "NFD" is absolutely not [part of] "Q"? How so? Do you know both entities? Can you prove it?
Can I prove it??? The burden of proof isn't on me. Are you looking to piss me off? Because you're getting very close to doing that.
You asserted that TDU is NFD. Therefore the burden of proof is absolutely on you to prove your claim.
I'm not trying to piss you off. I'm simply asking questions. You're choosing how to respond to them. If you choose to get pissed off, that's your choice, but it's not evidence proving your accusation that I'm intentionally trying to piss you off. Instead of getting pissed off, perhaps better address the questions and control your emotions so that we might continue to engage in meaningful dialogue?