Throwback to one of the most disheartening tales a teacher had to offer.
(media.greatawakening.win)
đź’Š RED PILL đź’Š
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (134)
sorted by:
I agree that Forced diversity is wrong. Let people decide on who they want to associate with.
But I also see things like this.
If our creator had these thoughts.
PROCREATION would not be allowed between various groups.
If God wanted to keep groups pure. I honestly believe that would have been forced at the procreation level. We would have no choice but to comply. It would be in nature to prevent procreation from various ethnic groups. God would have created a universal law naturally to keep groups from mixing at the procreation level.
This is my engineer brain thinking here lol.
But that did not happen. So that tells me that forced ethnic separation is also wrong as well.
There should be no "forced diversity" or "forced separation". A lot of the stop forcing diversity crowd really wants forced separation.
God sees us as the same race of humans that are linked via the ability to procreate with each other. (Man and Woman)
But we also have differences such as skin, hair, language, food, etc.
Human beings by nature are designed to seek a variety of experiences. I love Pizza and Burgers.
But I do not seek to eat them every day.
I grew up with all black people. So I dated nothing but black women.
As I got exposed to other ethnic groups.
I saw different forms of the beauty of God's creation.
So I dated girls from other ethnic groups.
Even though I notice some communication differences between different girls from a variety of girls I dated growing up.
There was also a common sense bond that allowed us to date without a problem.
What people ignore is "common law" by nature.
Common law is the common sense contract that nature has put in place that binds all humans together.
Everything else is man-made innovations that spark competition and cultural ideas.
So when people say they are preserving their culture. They are not talking about common law by nature.
They are talking about man made innovations that has bonded a subgroup within the human race in a certain way.
Even though there is forced integration, I haven’t heard much call for forced separation. It’s usually voluntary separation.
“PROCREATION would not be allowed between various groups. If God wanted to keep groups pure. I honestly believe that would have been forced at the procreation level. We would have no choice but to comply. It would be in nature to prevent procreation from various ethnic groups. God would have created a universal law naturally to keep groups from mixing at the procreation level.”
By that logic, we wouldn’t physically be able to murder. God would’ve programmed in us something like Asimov’s laws for robots where a human can never harm another human. We’d be like Robocop glitching out trying to violate the Fourth Directive. God gave us free will to murder or not to murder, but that doesn’t mean that He wants us to murder.
God’s opinion on multiculturalism and miscegenation is better illustrated by His resolution of the tower of babel. He wanted the different peoples so separated that He instantly gave them different languages.
Also, Matthew 25:32
“All the nations will be gathered before Him, and He will separate them one from another, as a shepherd divides his sheep from the goats.”
Come up with me with a better example.
Murder is a choice. As I mention.
Converting sperm and egg into a person.
Is a process that we do not control. It's a predefined "system" that God created.
Murder isn't a physical concept. It's an angry emotional concept.
God does tell us "Thou shall not kill".
But those are warnings. We still have free will.
Some of the things by nature are free will like murder. Some of the things by nature are predefined systemic processes God already created.
When you create software or any system.
Certain predefined processes are built by the engineers. You cannot change those creations.
The users of the software have free will to use those predefined processes according to the rules already defined by the engineers.
That's how creation works.
People are able to conceive people with birth defects, but that doesn’t mean that it’s part of God’s plan. It’s just part and parcel of living in a fallen world.
Maybe there are some tolerances for mixing. Maybe in extreme cases it’s an alternative to severe depopulation, but in most cases, it’s not in the best interest of either race involved.
Every manufacturing process has defects. This is normal to any forms of engineering/
As humans innovate from predefined nature. That will cause the predefined system to react.
For example.
As we pollute the air. As we add man made chemicals to food.
These things will add oxidative stress to our bodies. Which will interfere with the procreation process.
Which increases the odds of birth defects.
Mixed bi racial kids are just as healthy as any other kid:
Now… are there some mixed kids with physical complications?
Of course there are. But that’s no different then a white kid developing autoimmune issues they inherited from their parents:
Procreation is not a perfect process and never will be.
As I said.
God would have stopped ethic mixing at the procreation level if he was against it.
He didn’t. Therefore it’s ok to do by nature.
This is physical process of creating life. We don’t define the rules of this.
God has defined the rules. I will follow Gods rules.
When you say it's not in the best interest.
That depends on what you prioritize as a person. You would need to expand on that.
For Example, I don't prioritize things in terms of what's in the best interest of black people.
That's because I cannot speak for all black people. That's because I do not have the same passions as all black people.
What you are saying in my view.
Is that ethnic groups are top-down pyramid structures.
That some group at the top tells your ethnic group certain rules. Then everyone in that group follows the rules because it's in their best interest.
I see ethnic groups as a flat structure. There is no what's in the best interest of the group.
That's a top-down model. A flat model operates more of a decentralized format. What's best for each individual.
I knew you were going to use the Murder logic.
Murder is not a physical biology concept that has to do with taking sperm and an egg.
Then converting that process into a human life.
Murder is a choice that falls in the "emotional" side of the world.
It's not a predefinded physical process.