This.👇🏻
(media.greatawakening.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (163)
sorted by:
I think it’s incredibly awful to say that a woman raped has to still carry a baby to term. Pregnancy does a significant ordeal to a woman’s body.
It's a worse thing to say "Kill an innocent child" because the father was a piece of shit.
It's a bad thing to force a woman to keep a reminder of one of her worst days.
I actually have a friend who was raped and kept her beautiful daughter. She sees her as a blessing that came out of a bad situation.
Not all women will see that the same way.
Yeah we went through this already, there's "bad" and then there's "far worse", you're on the wrong side of it.
No, I don't think it's worse, especially considering the pregnancy can be terminated early, long before the fetus is viable. Not only would the woman have to live with the trauma of being raped (or even raped from a family member incest baby), which will be the case no matter what, but then suffer the physical affects from the pregnancy and raising a child that bears a resemblance to her rapist. Highly likely the woman would grow to resent the child, and the foster care system is historically not kind to children.
Absolutely would argue that's worse than an abortion. A woman should have the right to carry/raise a child that she is ready and willing to.
This is the wrong construct. A toddler is not viable unless someone cares for it.
Viability is a red herring. Don’t fall for it.
That's because you're a retard, you think "muh trauma" is worse than being murdered. The mother is not required to keep the child, she can put it up for adoption. Look, anyone sane can accept that carrying an unwanted child is going to be a rough time for the mother, however the pregnancy came about, however:
Murdering a child - is worse than being pregnant for 9 months in a manner you'd have rather not. This point is not disputable. Give the mother state funded counselling and monetary aid however it needs to be done. Just don't kill children. It's a simple premise.
She does have that right already lol, what you're really asking for and unable to type out is that women should have the right to arbitrarily murder their child because having it would be inconvenient. If it's some solace for you I believe rapists should be burned alive in the public square.
So now we have a woman being raped, and because of this the taxpayers not only have to pay for the child’s care, but the woman’s trauma as well having to carry her rapists baby?
A woman shouldn’t be forced to carry a child of rape, is what I’m actually asking for
it's more awful to say that a child must be murdered to spare a woman from pregnancy, imho. you'd be surprised how many women make the choice to carry the child.
When you put it so simply, sure. But situations aren’t always that simple. I understand some women make the choice to carry the child, and that’s their choice. My point is it should be a choice, and not forced.
this was where the the game started. do you know abortion was described early on as "safe but rare" ?
What part of "thou shall not kill" is confusing?
The sad part is if she gets raped and pregnant in the wrong state, her rapist may have access to her through custodial rights of the child he fathered. THAT needs to change.
If you believe abortion is murder and thus she has no right to end a life, then she has no right to end a life.
I don't believe abortion is murder, so that's part of where we're going to disagree.
Some random....She doesn't. Step 1. report the rape...get a pill. Problem solved.
The pill isn’t a fail safe. That’s part of the issue
I was referring to the day after pill given to a rape victim. I see no problem sending the issue back to the states since the decision was a huge over reach by the SC in 73.
Yes, I'm well aware of that. I'm telling you that it isn't a failsafe