What if this public display of Dr. Oz is simply the patriots showcasing to the Deep State that their actors are able to be swayed, that nobody is loyal?
If you have the ability to capture AND convert an asset, that's better than simply gaining an asset or them losing one of theirs.
If they can get Oprah's guy on side, you have a powerful tool to help along the normies who still live in daytime TV land, and you cause paranoia and dissent within the enemy's ranks just as they're desperately trying to recruit and rile up more assets.
Now, let's say they try to destroy the Oz political career and there's truth to his dual citizenship and voting in Turkey, do they roll out the lines trying to attack him on those lines? We certainly see them trying.
Once that line of attack has been established, it doesn't hurt Trump. You know who it hurts?
Jamaican/Indian Kamala Harris. They've established a precedent for going after that in the corrupt media.
Bam. Biden's gone, Harris is gone.
Always interested in reading and entertaining various theories......at the same time Im not trying to figure it out beyond
"Trump knows what he is doing"
I was thinking it was to highlight the duel citizenships that an awful lot of the congress critters possess…have to end that crap!
Oz was in the WEF.
Oz is a dual citizen.
Oz never even voted in PA.
His speech was on point and seemed to be MAGA; but how do we know we can trust him? I trust Trump. But I would also never take the vaccines. How do we know Oz isn't Trump's new "vaccine-esque" endorsement for 22'???
This is what is driving me mad. There are so many other top notch candidates - why in the fuck would Trump select Oz?
Is it due to the middle being willing to vote for him? Or is there something else at play?
I've only got a week and a half to figure this out, and 50+ people are waiting on my (arbitrary and somewhat useless) opinion to help guide them.
Given that the political game is based around controlled bouts of blackmail, is it possible that Oz was selected purely because of the things you mentioned?
That is, is there wartime value, asset-wise, in capturing and using a person with a built in audience who also has usable Intel/connections within the WEF?
Whatever value Oz has, it was considered tactically more important than having a few annoyed anons.
"Whatever value Oz has, it was considered tactically more important than having a few annoyed anons."
I would certainly like to believe this is true!
"You knew damn well I was a snake before you let me in." Feel sorry for the PA folks to have to make that decision. Ask God to guide you in all things.
Honest question: is daytime tv still a thing? I know of very few that have cable and those that do don’t watch it religiously like in the 80s-90s. I do like the Oz->Oprah potential exposure. Dismantle their idols one by one.
When you're old and retired, you grew up on TV, and it hurts to move, and you can't do the things you did in your youth, daytime TV becomes more attractive.
But you're right. It's not the social control powerhouse that it has been for decades. It does however have sway.
At the very least, for a lot of people, it still has a veneer of legitimacy.
I can’t believe how entangled the cabal became in tv and now social media. We’re fighting on so many fronts all at once. I don’t think the ones who say nothing is happening understand this. We have to deprogram the 50+ crowd via tv and the rest on social media. That’s a huge undertaking. So help me if we get this ship turned around I’ll relentlessly call out each and every person on their faggotry on the spot. No more placating or looking the other way.
Heavenly Father, lesson learned.
I like it, very plausible. I’ve been wondering how he would play out.
if he has been turned it would also showcase that they have oprah over a barrel as well.
What if they want the anons to dig the dirt on him, and even get the lefties working on it too?
Oz leads to the rabbit hole with Oprah hiding at the bottom. Dig deep enough and human trafficking gets exposed to the light.