Interesting and fascinating theory about why the justices are getting military protection.
(media.greatawakening.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (73)
sorted by:
According to Forbes, they threw out the last case about a year ago. That's not to say there can't be new ones, but I haven't found any.
Yeah it feels like there would have to be a case.
Are there any historical examples of the court taking a case in secret?
Well shit, guess that would have been worth a search before a post. 😅
https://www.cnbc.com/2019/01/22/supreme-court-will-let-possible-mueller-company-file-papers-in-secret.html
Interdasting! I wonder whatever happened to the case that Mike Lindell was trying to get before the SCOTUS?
I was just going to ask about this. Glad that I kept reading.
According to this thing, they've done so recently. Interesting.
Absolutely. And you aren't going to hear about them....
There is a requirement in the constitution that all people have to right to a public trial. They can wave that right if they choose.
But other cases have no requirement of being public. In fact, the court might find that keeping the details of a case secret may be necessary for the case to get a fair hearing or to protect national secrets.
Election fraud would likely fall under both categories. The sources and methods used to catch foreign governments in the act are likely sensitive.
I disagree. Who would be getting sued? You don't have to know who did the thing for the thing to be true and provable. Seems they would have the power to address the issue outside of litigation. My 2 cents. For instance no one sued to overturn roe they just decided to end it. As far as I can tell anyway.
My popcorn has been hot for years.
Mine's stale and now it's to expensive to buy more.
It would be on their docket. It's not therefore this is fake and ghey.
Its almost like i remember someone saying "Military is the only way"...