Incoming - project blue beam. They are prepping us next week!
(media.greatawakening.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (64)
sorted by:
You can't call them Unidentified Aerial Vehicles (UAV) because the acronym clashes with Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV). UFO is nicer because it doesn't have to be a vehicle.
That's a purposeful tactic used by [them] so when that time does come for full disclosure re: E.T.s, [they] can better confuse the public as to the original of what humanity has been cataloging for millenia.
Some of the shit up there is ours, after all. But [they] won't readily disclose that info to the public because then [they]'d have to admit that we do, in fact, live in a fucking prison planet and have been purposely and purposefully denied the advanced tech [they] have been R&D'ing for well over 100 yrs.
What "advanced tech" in R&D for 100 years? If you don't know what it is, you don't know that it is. We've been working on nuclear fusion for the past 70 years and still don't have it. Meanwhile, microelectronics and computer software have been bashing along since the 1960s in plain sight. We could have done great things with nuclear energy, but the Greenies and fearful people have put the damper on that. Also in plain sight. There are no silver bullets and there is no alien technology. Getting a grip on reality is essential if we are to get through these times.
TR-3B anti gravity vechile. It's existed for decades
I'm not interested in hoaxes or fantasy. Where has anyone in government acknowledged anything by this designation? I did a bit of a search and there was only unverifiable video (of what?) and sheer speculation and lots of fake artwork. The articles had word-salad descriptions of how it was supposed to work. This is not science; it is urban myth.
I thought they were calling them UAPs (Unidentified Aerial Phenomena)?
SiS (shit in sky)
UAPs along with UAVs both have a different scope than UFOs.
The Unidentified Aerial and Unidentified Flying have the same contextual meaning, I can deal with that.
Object has a larger scope than Vehicle, as all objects are not necessarily vehicles. Phenomena is interesting in that the it is also broad in scope but could have many different conceptual meanings to individuals, leading to confusion,i.e.I am more inclined to think of a weather event then a craft of some sort. . When you say object, most of us, no matter our backgrounds think 'a thing' which is what UFO in my mind is suppose to be.
They love changing definitions though, I still don't know what's wrong with UFO.
Watch that "manned" word. Unpeopled DUDE! LOL
Why did they stop calling them UFO's
Well it is a powered vehicle though.
This is where it gets a little hairy for me. Vehicle has a specific definition. Are all UFO's truly vehicles? I think it narrows the meaning and now what do we call UFOs that are not vehicles?