I thought I had a lefty when he said there was no order to the National Guard for reinforcements before January 6. The order came from Trump to Pelosi and she declined, I wrote.
Long story short, appearantly there’s no evidence that Trump gave that order to Pelosi according to Washington Post https://t.co/fsdGJhQ62S
I realised I am just taking Trumps word for it as I trust Trump more than probably any source of information in the world. It doesn’t help me in a debate though.
So is there any evidence for this?
I wouldn’t even bother going down that rabbit hole because the moment you prove them wrong on one fact, they start “misconstruing” the facts and jump out with some new shit. Note the title and the content. It’s misleading and Narratively shaped as well. Maybe trump unofficially requested more troops. See if you can find any data where the news is saying something like “trump requesting more troops to protect him” or to “help steal the election” or some other way out there narrative
This article explains it better
TL;DR - Trump definitely told pentagon that they might need 10,000 national guard. According to Miller and former CIA lawyer Adam Ciralsky, this is true. However, Trump assumed that this info was passed on to Pelosi and nothing was done. This is what he thought not claimed as first ahnd info. It seems Miller dismissed that estimate on his own, so it was not sent to Pelosi, at least not by him.
Thank you, this was what I was looking for.
BTW, you cant argue with people on an uneven playing field. They throw around MSM fake news articles and it supposed to be accepted as actual evidence, but the real truth can only be found in fringle and alt sites and they dont even accept it.
I find this kind of debates quite pointless really. Its best to drop crumbs and move on. If they get curious, drop more crumbs, and when they are ready you can drop the whole bread.
https://thehill.com/homenews/administration/532739-bowser-to-doj-pentagon-dc-isnt-requesting-federal-law-enforcement-to/
But there is proof that the democrat mayor of DC didn't want more officers nor, soldiers in place prior to the demonstrations.
Had Trump put additional troops after being asked by the mayor to not do that, the democrats would have accused him of trying to use the military to intimidate members of congress, and still played the insurrectionist card against Trump, directly.
I agree with PBE below.
My best recommendation would be something to the effect of what could Trump do, no matter what he did would get trounced by the dems, rinos, and MSM.
Trump being the genius that he is sent a memo, covering his ass. Demanding national guard.
Dated before Jan 6th
I expect that he will show us all the evidence in the end, but before that we have to endure President Pelosi. That would be glorious.
The tards on twitter don't give a damn about evidence.
Your first mistake is in debating a lefty, they have no interest in the truth if it doesnt fit their story.....sad but true...
I belive it’s good to try your arguments in the real world. You will quickly find flaws in your own reasoning.
The first time I tried I could not stop myself, I unloaded weeks of research over a couple of hours. They were shocked, but not because of the dynamite info I shared, more so because they had invited a lunatic into their home. :D I learned my lesson.
Ha, well you tried.......I am convinced they wont hear anything unless its said by one of their MSM gods.....keep thinking in my mind that its one of the final steps of the awakening, that is getting MSM to tell the truth somehow.....
WaPo thinks if it isn’t on the internet, it isn’t true.