The Fog Of War...đź‘€
(media.greatawakening.win)
Comments (34)
sorted by:
He needs to tell us why OZ is a good choice with all that lefty baggage he’s bringing with him.
Has OZ flipped? Because he doesn’t look like a conservative.
C’mon, Trump! Your endorsements haven’t been the best. Mitt Romney for goodness sake!
You need to give us more reasons to vote OZ!
Look up the Club for Growth who is bank rolling Barnett. They are pure globalists for illegal immigration, no tariffs and against fair trade.
What are Barnett's view on economic policies and immigration?
Also look at where Oz's funding has come from then while you're at it...
Good question.
Tell me....where has it?
Keep asking questions of everyone.
Sands was in the Trump Admin....she wasn't endorsed either.
My guess. They cant come after Oz without implicating themswlves in some way.
He knows what he's doing.
The least evil of them all?
"she has many things in her past..."
He's telling us to dig for the reason why he's against her.
Direct message
Don’t even have to get your decoder ring out for that comm.
She is a race baiter. Seems like a Democrat plant.
The difference is that Oz has been friends with Trump for years, in FL and NY.
Trump trusts Oz.... no one knows why but him.
And some still believe Pence and Barr are white hats.... McCarthy made ant-Trump statements after Jan. 6 and explained why he said them. I don’t like McCarthy.
Has Barnette recanted what she said about Trump...I just don’t know. This is all beyond me, so I trust Trump.
Do you get the feeling maybe President Trump’s team met with her and she couldn’t or wouldn’t answer certain questions?
I completely get that we struggle with some of his endorsements. Sometimes we need to zoom out and remember Q+ has the goal of bringing down the cabal. Part of that strategy is to fracture the Uniparty by a MAGA takeover of the Republican Party.
It seems pretty likely the same team who gamed out winning the 2016 election is still behind the scenes gaming out next steps. Dr Oz has a role to play, we don’t know what it is. Just like Mitt Romney has a role to play, which appears to be exposing the existence of the Uniparty to conservative leaning people who were/are still asleep.
We don't need any more finger pointing......we already see the enemy.....this 5d chess shit has to end. We the American people want and demand ACTION!! NOW!
NO MORE GAME THEORY. NO MORE GAMES. Take control back NOW.
Trump backed a bunch of Judas RINOs. He has a blind spot for celebrity, resume, and pretty women.
Oz is all of the above.
Has Oz been properly explained and vetted?
No, we are simply to do what we're told. The only difference is Trump is telling us what to do as opposed to the GOP/uniparty telling us what to do. It surprises me the amount of anons on here who don't see this as a problem. Barnette is politically un-savy. She seems to not be part of "the plan" while Oz must be under control. Perhaps this is THE reason for Trumps endorsement and lack of addressing PA's real concerns with OZ. If this is so, does PA want a candidate with a full blown liberal past that Trump is telling us to vote for or a not so politically clever candidate who has rambled about the globalists and social issues much like Trump used to?
If I were in PA, I would trust Trump's judgement on this. There doesn't seem to be an 100% good choice here.
Sands would be better....no race card to play.
So bring a "politically un-savy" (your words) to contend in the general election?
Not logical. Also, Barnett is funded by anti-Trump The Club for Growth....surprised The Lincoln Project isn't backing her too.
Your "rambled" like "Trump used to" doesn't sound very complimentary....are you a Cruzer or never-Trumper?
Sands might be better.
I do not care for Barnette talking race issues. I do consider this negatively and weigh it according in my opinion.
Being well versed in political insider communication is not a prerequisite to being electable. It may or may not be a strength or weakness in the general election. Whoever wins the pa primaries are almost for sure going to win the general.
Logic has to do with perspective. I'll ask again. Are you in PA?
Cruzer/never Trumper? I guess you can't go against the man once with expecting that question.
I'll look into Oz's funding. How much more has he spent than Barnette?
Seems like he is also leaving a door open
Would he endorse her if she beats OZ?
This. This right here is why do many MAGA like myself scream at him.....gonna be real friends..... Russel brand starting to make more sense wierder and wierder as it gets....Trump is too close to the billionaire reich.....
🤡 🌎
How come no one's talking about Carla Dands? I only saw her commercial and commercials always sound good but it did sound good lol. Definitely made me curious about her but I don't see anyone else wondering about her.
I would appreciate an explanation, beyond Dr Oz is the only one who can win the election. I get it, Barnett has some skeletons in her closet - who doesn’t?
In the end I’m not a PA pede, so I won’t be voting. Just very curious.
Did he vet her like like he vetted Bolton? GTFO
Bolton had years of experience and was used as a tool against Iran. they knew Bolton was a warmonger.....besides Trump could fire Bolton.
This Senate seat is very important, and if someone can't win in the general election that will mess things up for years.
Here are some attack ads....I really don't know what to believe so I choose to believe POTUS
https://twitter.com/gregkellyusa/status/1524762621068693516?s=20&t=sV4OlIgXBKzLdS7-zfL0IA
Obviously the opposite of whatever he says is what he really means.
By ~“Get the shot” he means don’t get the shot.
By ~“what Russia is doing is genocide” he means Ukraine is Nazism.
By ~”Kathy Barnette can not win, I support Dr. Oz,” he clearly means that we should support Barnette over Oz every step of the way.
It is comms, 4-D Chess style.
/s