Whoever, under color of any law, statute, ordinance, regulation, or custom, willfully subjects any person in any State, Territory, Commonwealth, Possession, or District to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured or protected by the Constitution or laws of the United States, or to different punishments, pains, or penalties, on account of such person being an alien, or by reason of his color, or race, than are prescribed for the punishment of citizens, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both; and if bodily injury results from the acts committed in violation of this section or if such acts include the use, attempted use, or threatened use of a dangerous weapon, explosives, or fire, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both; and if death results from the acts committed in violation of this section or if such acts include kidnapping or an attempt to kidnap, aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to commit aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to kill, shall be fined under this title, or imprisoned for any term of years or for life, or both, or may be sentenced to death.
I hate to be a spoilsport, but have you ever heard of anyone winning one of these suits? The only instances I know of, involve conduct so egregious it's obvious that the plaintiff will win, such as a prison guard handing a razorblade to a suicidal inmate. Suing under title 18 for clear violations of constitutional rights (such as being deprived the right to a trial by jury) will always be dismissed by the courts.
They will get away with exactly how much we allow them to get away with.
Obviously you will have a harder or easier time winning a suit depending on the corruption level in your county. You can affect this by running for office and diluting the corruption % by the amount of integrity you bring to the table.
Thanks for what you're doing. Everyone should be trying to file lawsuits against government officials when they infringe on their rights, no matter how hard they try to make it for us.
Do you know about filing suits at common law? Most lawsuits these days are based off of some sort of statute that was passed in recent times but suits under the common law date back to before the founding of this country and are enshrined in the 7th amendment
In Suits at common law, where the value in controversy shall exceed twenty dollars, the right of trial by jury shall be preserved
Have you ever wondered why, when you file some lawsuits, your supposed right to a trial by jury is not always preserved? How is it possible that you can go into court, claim you have a right to a trial by jury under the 7th amendment, and the judge can tell you to shut your mouth and not say that again or you'll be held in contempt of court?
The answer is you're not involved in a suit at common law. What is a suit at common law? It is only those causes of action that existed in the year that the constitution was ratified (1789). In otherwords, if you couldn't sue for it in 1789, it's not a suit "at common law" and your "right" to a trial by jury is a privilege that depends on something other than the 7th amendment (such as court rulings or legislation). If you ever file a suit under title 18 and your right to a trial by jury is not respected, this is likely the reason why.
Here you can find really good youtube videos talking about common law:
A person admitted to citizenship in conformity with the provisions of this subchapter shall be entitled upon such admission to receive from the Attorney General a certificate of naturalization, which shall contain substantially the following information: Number of application for naturalization; number of certificate of naturalization; date of naturalization; name, signature, place of residence, autographed photograph, and personal description of the naturalized person, including age, sex, marital status, and country of former nationality; location of the district office of the Service in which the application was filed and the title, authority, and location of the official or court administering the oath of allegiance; statement that the Attorney General, having found that the applicant had complied in all respects with all of the applicable provisions of the naturalization laws of the United States, and was entitled to be admitted a citizen of the United States of America, thereupon ordered that the applicant be admitted as a citizen of the United States of America; attestation of an immigration officer; and the seal of the Department of Justice.
If they both have to be mentioned, it presumes that both have separate identities.
Further inspection shows that the United States is NOT a member of the United Nations, however the United States of America is.
The best proof that there is a parallel government is the post office. There is a difference between the Post Office and the United States Postal Service (USPS). The USPS is a private corporation, which is why ZIP codes are a copyrighted trademark. Go to any USPS webpage that mentions the term "ZIP code" and you will see a "tm" symbol beside it. Yet more evidence that the USPS is a private corporation can be found in their website address, which is usps.comNOT .gov.
The USPS' status as a private corporation is why they are able to force you to pay a higher rate for post than is allowed by the US constitution, which is set at a fixed rate of $0.02 per half-ounce.
The question then becomes, does the original post office still exist or was it completely usurped and eliminated when the USPS was formed and the department of the Post Office was abolished? If you talk to any lawyer, they will tell you that the USPS replaced the original post office and that the original office no longer exists.
...But that is provably untrue, and you can prove it by sending yourself a letter without using a copyrighted ZIP code, at the fixed postage rate of $0.02 per half ounce. Read this Microsoft Word document for a walk-through on how to do this.
Zip codes are a copyright trademark of the UNITED STATES POSTAL SYSTEM, and in being such, there is a "royalty fee," that is charged for the usage thereof. This is why the rate for a first class mail stamp for the US POSTAL SERVICE is, I believe now 44-cents (I haven't used one in quite some time). The charge over and above the rate of Post is a, "royalty fee," for the usage of THEIR zip codes. The rate for first class Post is still and has always been .02-cents per one half ounce (.5 or 1/2). Again, this rate has never changed! There is no royalty fee when sending via the Post Office. Moreover, your Post is considered International and this is very significant!
Furthermore, the royalty fee also applies to the usage of the two-letter symbol that they use in place of spelling out the name of a State/Republic. This is a RE-presentation of the states united into TERRITORIES of the UNITED STATES. This is no different from when living beings are RE-presented by an Attorney.
Now, below are the procedures that I use when sending Post via the Post Office.
Always, always, always, use the Drop Box , and never put Post into anything that is labeled, "UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE." You know the UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE MAILBOX very well. It is any MAILBOX that blue in color. However, the "Post Office Drop Box" is always inside the Post Office, and it is always in the wall. Some Post Office's still have it labeled, "DROP BOX," right above it. A great many do not, for they have removed it since nobody was using it anymore. However, this does not mean that the Drop Box has been removed. Remember, the "Post Office Drop Box" is not a U.S. POSTAL SERVICE MAILBOX, or any blue box in the lobby of the Post Office marked with the UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE logo on it. Look for the Mail Slot that is in the wall. The color is usually a very bland gold color, or beige. If you are not sure, ask the Post Master. Most POSTAL SERVICE employees are not aware of this. Although you may find one or two that are aware of it; I have!
Nevertheless, if you put your Post into a UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE MAILBOX, it will not be treated as if you were putting it into the "Post Office Drop Box." It will be returned to you with a postage due message. That is it; No harm, no damage, no foul; Just a postage due request. So make sure to use the "Post Office Drop Box" when sending Post only and do not drop your post into any of the UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE MAILBOX'S (always blue) which are for sending MAIL through the POSTAL SERVICE only.
Caveat: Some of the US POSTAL SERVICE locations have downsized and as a result, you may not find a "Post Office Drop Box," at that location. In this case, all you need to do is go to a bigger branch office nearby.
Now, for the return address which is more accurately called, "Return Mail Location," and the addressee, again accurately referred to as, "Mail Location." However, for the sake of this explanation, and to limit confusion, I will use "address" and "addressee"... Below both the return address and the addressee's address, at the very bottom of the address and addressee, I reference their Domestic Mail Manuel's zip code exempt clause, in place of where the zip code would go for the POSTAL SERVICE, as follows: [zip code exempt DMM 602 1.3 e. (2)]
Now this is very interesting information and backs up what I have read years ago. In the late 90s, a friend shared these rare documents with me that described the differences between being a citizenship and resident in America. This article overlaps much of what I read back then.
Thank you for sharing and hope more information like this is exposed and validated.
There is a lot of disinformation around this topic, but read my post here about the post office and you will see that much of what is being said about a parallel government has to be true.
Actually the Act of 1871 is responsible for this mess-another congress of baboons betrayed We the People by Changing the header to the constitution from "The Constitution for the united states of America" to THE CONSITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; capital letters tells the "legal" tale.
Knowledge is power. This DOES apply to them and their employees.
United States Code
Title 18 Crimes and Criminal Procedure
Chapter 13 CIVIL RIGHTS
Section 242 Deprivation of rights under color of law
https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-title18-section242&num=0&edition=prelim
Thank you for providing this supporting material!!
I hate to be a spoilsport, but have you ever heard of anyone winning one of these suits? The only instances I know of, involve conduct so egregious it's obvious that the plaintiff will win, such as a prison guard handing a razorblade to a suicidal inmate. Suing under title 18 for clear violations of constitutional rights (such as being deprived the right to a trial by jury) will always be dismissed by the courts.
They will get away with exactly how much we allow them to get away with.
Obviously you will have a harder or easier time winning a suit depending on the corruption level in your county. You can affect this by running for office and diluting the corruption % by the amount of integrity you bring to the table.
If you don't want to run for office or be among the first to file suit, you can still easily help by doing a simple thing. Pass along knowledge of the above, as well as USC Title 18 Section 241 (conspiracy of two or more officials attempting to deprive you of your rights under color of law, which carries significantly enhanced penalties).
That's all I'm doing. Hope it helps all of us.
Thanks for what you're doing. Everyone should be trying to file lawsuits against government officials when they infringe on their rights, no matter how hard they try to make it for us.
Do you know about filing suits at common law? Most lawsuits these days are based off of some sort of statute that was passed in recent times but suits under the common law date back to before the founding of this country and are enshrined in the 7th amendment
Have you ever wondered why, when you file some lawsuits, your supposed right to a trial by jury is not always preserved? How is it possible that you can go into court, claim you have a right to a trial by jury under the 7th amendment, and the judge can tell you to shut your mouth and not say that again or you'll be held in contempt of court?
The answer is you're not involved in a suit at common law. What is a suit at common law? It is only those causes of action that existed in the year that the constitution was ratified (1789). In otherwords, if you couldn't sue for it in 1789, it's not a suit "at common law" and your "right" to a trial by jury is a privilege that depends on something other than the 7th amendment (such as court rulings or legislation). If you ever file a suit under title 18 and your right to a trial by jury is not respected, this is likely the reason why.
Here you can find really good youtube videos talking about common law:
https://www.youtube.com/c/CraigLynch
/u/Slingding u/Archon69 u/WhoDey2022
Thank you very much for the link. Lots of clips to choose from. Hope you are having a good weekend.
Have you ever seen https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/8/1449 8 USC 1449, that mentions both United States and United States of America in the same paragraph?
If they both have to be mentioned, it presumes that both have separate identities.
Further inspection shows that the United States is NOT a member of the United Nations, however the United States of America is.
The Corporation Services Company and the "United States Corporation Company" is a major rabbithole:
https://archive.4plebs.org/pol/thread/305072570/
Note that Joe Biden is from Delaware.
https://www.redemptionservice.com/wizard-of-oz/
https://communities.win/c/GreatAwakening/p/140Irznw4k/x/c/4JIOPuQeBUd?d=50
/u/Slingding u/mengderen u/OntologyStudyIt
The best proof that there is a parallel government is the post office. There is a difference between the Post Office and the United States Postal Service (USPS). The USPS is a private corporation, which is why ZIP codes are a copyrighted trademark. Go to any USPS webpage that mentions the term "ZIP code" and you will see a "tm" symbol beside it. Yet more evidence that the USPS is a private corporation can be found in their website address, which is usps.com NOT .gov.
The USPS' status as a private corporation is why they are able to force you to pay a higher rate for post than is allowed by the US constitution, which is set at a fixed rate of $0.02 per half-ounce.
The question then becomes, does the original post office still exist or was it completely usurped and eliminated when the USPS was formed and the department of the Post Office was abolished? If you talk to any lawyer, they will tell you that the USPS replaced the original post office and that the original office no longer exists.
...But that is provably untrue, and you can prove it by sending yourself a letter without using a copyrighted ZIP code, at the fixed postage rate of $0.02 per half ounce. Read this Microsoft Word document for a walk-through on how to do this.
Now this is very interesting information and backs up what I have read years ago. In the late 90s, a friend shared these rare documents with me that described the differences between being a citizenship and resident in America. This article overlaps much of what I read back then.
Thank you for sharing and hope more information like this is exposed and validated.
There is a lot of disinformation around this topic, but read my post here about the post office and you will see that much of what is being said about a parallel government has to be true.
Thanks for posting!!
I’ve seen some of this stuff floating around, but how do we uproot this system?
That makes them an Occupying Foreign Power
and J6 prisoners are POWs who are being treated inhumanly.
Since 1861 in fact.
Actually the Act of 1871 is responsible for this mess-another congress of baboons betrayed We the People by Changing the header to the constitution from "The Constitution for the united states of America" to THE CONSITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; capital letters tells the "legal" tale.