First, his article: https://theconservativetreehouse.com/blog/2022/05/17/special-prosecutor-frames-the-background-of-the-sussmann-case-the-fbi-was-manipulated-duped-by-clinton-campaign/
TLDR; The FBI, the CIA, Obama's cabinet, the who's who of the deep state are being setup to be protected by the Sussman trial. They were "duped" by Hillary's henchmen. Those poor poor souls. 🙄
Fact Based Argument
Sundance is one of those people that you never really want to take on directly. He is a heavy weight when it comes to understanding politics and the deep state. It is not wise to casually disagree with him. He is well researched and puts a lot of thought behind his opinions.
So I am not going to do that. Because on the face of it, he is right. The trial is precisely being framed as Sussman and other's duped the poor FBI.
"But BC, you said he was wrong!"
Well, his overall assessment of the situation is wrong, not his laser focus on this particular trial.
In this particular trial, no FBI, clowns etc are going to be found guilty. We already know that. We know that, because THEY ARE NOT ON TRIAL... here.
Who is on trial? Sussman. And what is he accused of doing? Lying to the FBI to use them as a political weapon. So strategically, what good would it do to go scorched earth on the FBI right now? None. In fact, it would be a strategic error. They are more likely to COOPERATE to make Sussman the fall guy for crimes they were willingly participating in.
The only way Sundance's fears play out, is if Durham is a one trick pony and this is the only trial. No one can undo the corruption and centralized power of the deep state in a single action. Or even a dozen actions, or 100. There are currently 290,000+ sealed indictments as of this moment. That's more likely the scope of righting this ship.
So that is the logical argument. Here is some hopium that u/Qlueless shared with me.
Hopium
Both the sealed indictment tracker site and this qpost, have a 310x163 picture of the US flag. Now, that is admittedly some interesting but weak hopium. It gets a little stranger.
As a long time amateur photographer, I recognized right away that the image was upscaled from a slightly lower resolution source. If you blow the images up, you'll see some tips of the stars are 2 pixels wide (as one example). This means it was upsampled using nearest neighbor (simple upscaling algorithm) from a source close to and slightly smaller in size. In addition, the "bad boys" flag and the Q flag are not copies of one another.
For all intents and purposes they are a match, but under the covers they are not. The Bad Boys image was saved as a PNG with a 55 color pallet (white and various shades of red and blue). The Q post image is exactly the same, but with 57 colors in its pallet (again, white with various shades of red and blue).
So why is THAT significant? I believe that Q was trying to make a subtle connection to the indictments for us as part of NCSWIC. However, using an exact copy of a relatively plain US Flag graphic is a little too subtle. Knowing that both images are not originals and appear to come from the same source, helps tie it together a little better, while maintaining plausible deniability. Because only the same source, upsampled with the same method, to the same final resolution, would produce that particular image. And by altering the color palette slightly, proves the image wasn't simply copied. Each image was intentional.
So to reiterate, the indictment tracker website and that Q post both grabbed used the exact same source image, both upsampled it in the exact same way, and both upsampled it to the exact same resolution. Thats a lot of coincidences for one image.
And what does that particular Q post say?
NCSWIC
And the flag size... just an odd size really, 310x163.
Post 310:
What has been said about the US Military?
The speech yesterday verified and unlocked so much.
Expand your thinking.
Re-read crumbs.
Re-listen to yesterday's speech.
Connect the 'markers.'
News (in all forms) unlocks the map.
Expand your thinking.
The Great Awakening.
Q
Post 163:
1&2 confirmed.
You will need for coming weeks.
Put it this way, six attempts were made to silence the witness scheduled to appear tomorrow.
Special operators on guard.
Q
👀
Pinging u/lonewulf and u/SemperSupra as our resident comms experts, to see if they see anything additional with the flags.
Excellent catch on the flag. I wonder if that is true of a lot of the graphics. If we should look at the measurements of the graphics to get hints as well.
I never have regarded Sussman as the target. He is a stepping stone. I notice Doomers trying to be like "but his max sentence won't be that high" which confused me. He was never the target anymore than Clinesmith (Durham's first indictment). Clinesmith sentence was very light and most of it was put as time served. He had his law license suspect till 2023 and he'll never have a security clearance again so he did pay a high price in other ways.
Sussman is simply further sucking the flies into Durham's web. He's more of a bait. Even if Sussman got 30 years would we be like "Oh yeah! Got 'em!". No, because it's not Sussman we want. It is what Sussman leads to.
Marc Elias is now ensnared. Marc is their moronic superlawyer who keeps losing embarrassing lawsuits. He connects to the Steele Dossier. Sussman also connected to Rodney Joffe who connects to many others.
People need to realize the connections and how RICO cases work.
https://greatawakening.win/p/141ra2y86V/overview-of-russiagate-scandal/c/
Baker talked and that is how they got Sussman on a lie. Baker talking means that no FBI are going to be found guilty in this trial. I'm surprised Sundance would ever think that. Of course not. That's why they talked and gave up Sussman.
One problem is that most people just read about RICO cases AFTER they've been finished. Never mind the 10-13 years it took to take down the mafia heads. We get a quick summary on wiki. We weren't watching and waiting for the 10 year take down. Imagine the agony of the families who had to wait that long for justice against some of these mob bosses.
Durham was involved in taking down the Gambino and several crime families.
Building a case of racketeering and conspiracy is a long process. It doesn't happen fast. It takes incredible patience and dedication.
Durham is framing things that way because the target is the Clinton Campaign, not the FBI. Of course he'd do it that way. The trial is about Sussman. You can't make it about other people. You are trying to prove that Sussman deliberately and knowingly lied. Durham is also working to prove that Sussman was working in broader conspiracy for the Clinton Campaign to spread malicious data in the hopes of Trump's campaign and administration being investigated by federal authorities.
It would be stupid and destroy the entire case if Durham tried to say that the FBI (the ones WHO gave the testimony that Sussman lied to them) were also part of the conspiracy. Durham would destroy his own case if he put the FBI on trial.
Obviously Durham can't do that. It is Baker's testimony that got Sussman indicted. You have to push that the FBI were the ones duped because you are using THEIR testimony against Sussman.
Very nice summary.
The only reason I looked at and considered the graphic size as possible comms, was because I felt they drew attention to it, coupled with it showing up on another relevant site. Not sure if it will play out with other examples, but it is worth paying attention to.
I wish we had better Q post search sites. Ones that allowed to specify attachments or even full SQL (or equivalent) query support. I'd love to do some more complex searching.
Exactly right. Sussman is only the first of many in Durham's crosshairs. I thought this was known to everyone...
Each trial will publicly reveal greater crimes as Durham works his way up the chain. When crimes against children are exposed both R and D voters will be calling for investigations into HRC, Obama, Soros, and the rest.
Utlimately, I'm not concerned about how Sussman trial will play out, because as yourself and others have already mentioned, this is just to get the ball rolling for what Durham has in store.
However, I think what people are concerned about is: will this first trial show patriots that "justice is coming"? It sucks to think about how Sussman, Elias, Perkins Coie, etc. are just going to get slaps on the wrist (potentially, we're not at the end yet...) when we KNOW they are part of the Cabal system. It would be nice to see all of the henchmen get their "just rewards" and we get some very nice wins along the way.
Personally, I think it will look like we are losing, right up until the moment we start winning and winning big.
The first indictment and trial was Clinesmith. He really did only get a slap on the wrist. Imagine what Q supporters a couple years ago thought from that first Durham indictment. It's going to be this way a lot when you are building a conspiracy case. Trump did say that Sussman is part of Durham's foundation.
Lots on the communist side will not be calling for investigations into Clinton, hussein, Soros, and whoever else because they're groomers. They're evil, but they're not Clinton and Soros evil. The groomers just want to fuck the kids, not sacrifice and eat them.
You always provide amazing analysis, so since this post is a day old, I'd hate for it to be overlooked. If you have a moment I'd appreciate it if you could peek at my comment above regarding the HTML label attached to the flag. I'm at work and can't dig very well.
u/SemperSupra
u/BasedCitizen
u/sleepydude
u/purkiss80
Looks like I'm late to the party. I was out for awhile this morning...
As to your comment:
"No one can undo the corruption and centralized power of the deep state in a single action. Or even a dozen actions, or 100. There are currently 290,000+ sealed indictments as of this moment. That's more likely the scope of righting this ship."
This makes complete sense. If you want to eat an elephant, you don't swallow him whole. Instead, you consume him bite by bite.
Death by a thousand cuts.
Just to throw this out here, is there any chance there is steganography in the flag image? I'm assuming the answer is probably not, but...?
I know it was being looked at in real time on the chans/q8kun. Not sure anyone has taken another look at it.