The SHILLARY Campaign lawyers are attempting to utilize an insane defense strategy.
They committed treason, and are claiming that they should not be prosecuted for their crimes because the case is incoherent and too complicated for a jury to understand.
This is why these high level crime organizations use so many proxies.
To convolute and distort their network to make it difficult to discover and prosecute if they were to get caught. As well as obviously insulate the people at the top.
The Clinton legal team stooping to this level indicates they are running out of options
And the response from Durham was...
** the legal equivalent of saying -
That bullshit isn’t going to work, we caught you.
He cited THE MAXWELL CASE as a legal precedent that there does not need to be a defined pact in writing to prove a conspiracy. Going on to cite the proof of the greater conspiracy network.
Pause
Clinton campaign lawyers have been indicted and are implicated in a literal “conspiracy” as per the US DOJ
The corrupt left-wing media simply refuse to acknowledge this reality.
Therefore their sheep don’t know anything about this case and their sense of reality manipulated by the omission of fact.
Citing the Maxwell case was a not so subtle jab to the Clinton camp.
IT WAS / IS A MESSAGE
A not so friendly reminder that we are prosecuting their pedo friends in a highly complex federal conspiracy case as we speak. We are coming for all of them.
Everyone should feel incredibly motivated by the posture of the Durham team and their no-nonsense approach to this case.
Don’t get discouraged just because you don’t see headlines on MSM.
THE REVOLUTION WILL NOT BE TELEVISED
-Clandestine-
PROPS to Clandestine for his assessment and breakdown.
N.
C.
S.
W.
I.
C.
There are people who follow around certain users on here and down vote every comment. There are also people who will make a comment and then down vote all the other comments in an effort to get their own comment to move up the thread.
"There are also people who will make a comment and then down vote all the other comments in an effort to get their own comment to move up the thread "
Define: glowfag
Technique #1 - 'FORUM SLIDING' If a very sensitive posting of a critical nature has been posted on a forum - it can be quickly removed from public view by 'forum sliding.' In this technique a number of unrelated posts are quietly prepositioned on the forum and allowed to 'age.' Each of these misdirectional forum postings can then be called upon at will to trigger a 'forum slide.' The second requirement is that several fake accounts exist, which can be called upon, to ensure that this technique is not exposed to the public. To trigger a 'forum slide' and 'flush' the critical post out of public view it is simply a matter of logging into each account both real and fake and then 'replying' to prepositioned postings with a simple 1 or 2 line comment. This brings the unrelated postings to the top of the forum list, and the critical posting 'slides' down the front page, and quickly out of public view. Although it is difficult or impossible to censor the posting it is now lost in a sea of unrelated and unuseful postings. By this means it becomes effective to keep the readers of the forum reading unrelated and non-issue items.
Technique #2 - 'CONSENSUS CRACKING' A second highly effective technique (which you can see in operation all the time at www.abovetopsecret.com) is 'consensus cracking.' To develop a consensus crack, the following technique is used. Under the guise of a fake account a posting is made which looks legitimate and is towards the truth is made - but the critical point is that it has a VERY WEAK PREMISE without substantive proof to back the posting. Once this is done then under alternative fake accounts a very strong position in your favour is slowly introduced over the life of the posting. It is IMPERATIVE that both sides are initially presented, so the uninformed reader cannot determine which side is the truth. As postings and replies are made the stronger 'evidence' or disinformation in your favour is slowly 'seeded in.' Thus the uninformed reader will most like develop the same position as you, and if their position is against you their opposition to your posting will be most likely dropped. However in some cases where the forum members are highly educated and can counter your disinformation with real facts and linked postings, you can then 'abort' the consensus cracking by initiating a 'forum slide.
echnique #3 - 'TOPIC DILUTION' Topic dilution is not only effective in forum sliding it is also very useful in keeping the forum readers on unrelated and non-productive issues. This is a critical and useful technique to cause a 'RESOURCE BURN.' By implementing continual and non-related postings that distract and disrupt (trolling ) the forum readers they are more effectively stopped from anything of any real productivity. If the intensity of gradual dilution is intense enough, the readers will effectively stop researching and simply slip into a 'gossip mode.' In this state they can be more easily misdirected away from facts towards uninformed conjecture and opinion. The less informed they are the more effective and easy it becomes to control the entire group in the direction that you would desire the group to go in. It must be stressed that a proper assessment of the psychological capabilities and levels of education is first determined of the group to determine at what level to 'drive in the wedge.' By being too far off topic too quickly it may trigger censorship by a forum moderator.
echnique #3 - 'TOPIC DILUTION' Topic dilution is not only effective in forum sliding it is also very useful in keeping the forum readers on unrelated and non-productive issues. This is a critical and useful technique to cause a 'RESOURCE BURN.' By implementing continual and non-related postings that distract and disrupt (trolling ) the forum readers they are more effectively stopped from anything of any real productivity. If the intensity of gradual dilution is intense enough, the readers will effectively stop researching and simply slip into a 'gossip mode.' In this state they can be more easily misdirected away from facts towards uninformed conjecture and opinion. The less informed they are the more effective and easy it becomes to control the entire group in the direction that you would desire the group to go in. It must be stressed that a proper assessment of the psychological capabilities and levels of education is first determined of the group to determine at what level to 'drive in the wedge.' By being too far off topic too quickly it may trigger censorship by a forum moderator.
bots looking for work now that Elon is flushing Twitter down the pipes.
KEK !
Wow...
That's sad
I bet if it would show who is down voting the down votes would go down. Lol
I bet upvotes would go down too, if you're going to have a point system at all I think anonymous is the best.
😆 shill psychology
That thought has never even crossed my mind. 😆