I may have finally found the meaning to CASTLE_ROCK, Q Post 4414 and my user handle, with this court case Town of Castle Rock v. Gonzales... in which the court ruled police agencies ARE NOT OBLIGATED TO PROVIDE PROTECTION OF CITIZENS - relevant to the shooting in Uvalde, TX
(en.wikipedia.org)
Q-analysis!
Comments (12)
sorted by:
Here is the Q-Post for reference: https://qposts.online/?q=4414&s=postnum
Thanks to this pede for dropping the hint on PAW: https://patriots.win/p/15IEF5K7md/the-blue-doesnt-back-you-/c/
If my connection here is correct, then we are somewhere in the RED 6 range... let me know your thoughts
Given tbat info,it destroys the Anti 2A argument to call the cops.
And tbey just proved it in Texas.
Thank you for digging, I referenced this earlier and glad someone dug in https://greatawakening.win/p/15IEAXjUij/liberal-checkmark-discussing-sho/c/
Good catch - double meaning?
Rob Reiner purchased castle rock studios in 2020. Probably produces the green screen fake Demoncrat propaganda
The NY State Supreme Court also ruled this way. You guys really need to understand, the police are not there to protect you.
Who is?
Look in the mirror.
Its only you. Always has been, always will be. Strap up.
Uh, then what's the use of having a police department? What are we actually paying them to do?
Uh, fight racism? Oh I know, protect corporate and state interests and property? Naw, can’t be that. It’s to fight racism I’m sure of it.
Enforce the law. Practically no one else does that. Yes it is understood police will run into a shooting, but there is no guarantee of an individual's safety, ever. Read the case it's much more nuanced than OP suggested. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Town_of_Castle_Rock_v._Gonzales
So much for "serve and protect"
to fine and arrest.
What about Warren v. DC?
Cartoon, but accurate and concise. The police work for the state and are under no obligation to protect citizens.
Why The Cops Won't Help You When You're Getting Stabbed | Oct 30, 2017 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jAfUI_hETy0