,................discovered during a controversial Georgia court case, which could in theory allow a malicious actor to tamper with the devices, according to a draft analysis reviewed by CNN."
We've asked all of the hackers "hey guys did any of you get up to some shenanigans on Nov 3rd?" and they said no. Then we wagged our fingers at them and told to make sure not to do any of that stuff in the future either.
It doesn't take a cybersecurity professional to say the machines were vulnerable. You could watch a few hacking videos on YouTube and easily hack the machines. Their cybersecurity posture is non-existent and their information security does not meet ISO standards. It is clear to me that the machines have been created to be vulnerable. Because that's the only explanation for how any device could be so easily hackable let alone some of the most important ones to our national security.
Then they IMMEDIATELY lied and said that even though they were vulnerable that no fraud had taken place.
They're gearing up to call the enevidble redwave for midterms fraudulent.
,................discovered during a controversial Georgia court case, which could in theory allow a malicious actor to tamper with the devices, according to a draft analysis reviewed by CNN."
https://www.cnn.com/2022/05/28/politics/dominion-voting-system-software-vulnerabilities/index.html
May be of interest: https://youtu.be/HA2DWMHgLnc
Is there anyone coming to save us?
We are the Cavalry.
Only in theory….no one would ever exploit the system though….never………………
Lying, it's what they do.
It's all they have ever had, but now blatant lies are all they have.
tune in next we for another thrilling episode of "As the Narrative Turns"
Sure, nobody took advantage of a built-in flaw. /s When did flaw become synonymous with design?
Mmmm indeed …..when
We've asked all of the hackers "hey guys did any of you get up to some shenanigans on Nov 3rd?" and they said no. Then we wagged our fingers at them and told to make sure not to do any of that stuff in the future either.
Oh well. Nothing to see here, I guess.
BREAKING: Local arsonist group reviews a nearby house fire and claims it was naturally occurring.
It doesn't take a cybersecurity professional to say the machines were vulnerable. You could watch a few hacking videos on YouTube and easily hack the machines. Their cybersecurity posture is non-existent and their information security does not meet ISO standards. It is clear to me that the machines have been created to be vulnerable. Because that's the only explanation for how any device could be so easily hackable let alone some of the most important ones to our national security.
So they're admitting there are flaws but no one has used them...
... Til.when, exactly?
You'd think software that counts dots wouldn't have any problems
Oh good. I was concerned for a minute there