I was listening to Bongino (don't crucify me, it's 90 degrees and I'm working outside so it's more for the noise than anything else). He said that Durham was not surprised by the verdict.
Why would he not be surprised? Was it due to nepotism of the judge to Lisa Page or what? His reaction is kind of a head scratcher.
Looking for thoughts here.
The judicial system has got to fail us. This is the evidence that the military is the only way.
https://greatawakening.win/p/15IEF7adqI/i-figured-out-durhams-game-plan-/
How do you build a bridge?
https://qalerts.app/?q=bridge
He can't make a case against Hillary without laying some groundwork.
They won't let him investigate Hillary to pursue that groundwork.
So, he aims at the low-hanging fruit, gets a couple of facts and testimonies established, all sworn to under oaths, and stacks them like a pile of bricks.
Once he has all the bricks ready, THEN he can lay the foundations for the bridge.
Once the foundation is built, the rest of the bridge comes up easy.
If a brick is faulty, however, then it doesn't matter how well crafted the rest of the bridge is. The weight of the world rests on that tiny brick.
He needs to be able to make his bricks without people shooting at him.
So... All his bricks are behind cover. Small cases that go nowhere, but construct individual components whose final form only can come into shape once it is all put together.
For Durham's current investigation, he has designed it such that everyone looks on in confusion during every step until the final product finally manifests.
Why do it this way?
Because, doing it this way, means that positively no one but Durham can have any idea how the pieces fit together.
Watch this:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O67a-gChNYg
At any point during the video, you'd probably be confused as to what the hell you're looking at.
Then, all of a sudden, the invention comes into view. You see it in action, and know the purpose.
There is no way to stop Durham, because they have absolutely no idea which parts to sabotage.
How do you keep a secret when everyone is watching you?
Please, watch this:
https://youtu.be/5Rb9hAHifFA?t=171
Big brain plays.
Great comment, sleepydude (including the one from three days ago you linked to). I haven't even seen the videos yet -- later, no time now -- but what you wrote is clear and persuasive. This one's an anti-doomer missile that would make an an excellent post by itself.
I think Durham was more focused on setting up the conspiracy with a mountain of evidence. This trial laid out the foundation for the rest of indictments of serious crimes will come
You and I both bro… 😳
It was over before it began. The purpose wasn't to take down Sussman.
u/#q1181
DC jury was all Hildabeast supporters and the judge’s wife represented Lisa Page. Durham knows the ropes.
Sounds so backwoods, doesn't. Their kids probably kiss their Uncle Daddy goodnight.
A couple of posts copied from my telegram channel:
It's a good day to catch up on Sussman, here are some links to get you started: https://technofog.substack.com/p/day-1-of-the-michael-sussmann-trial?s=r DAY 1 Where we begin to see key players who helped build the web of this conspiracy to influence our elections by the DNC.
https://technofog.substack.com/p/day-1-of-the-michael-sussmann-trial?s=r Day 2 where we see that admissions are made in email before lies are told in person. And we get a bit more definition on who is involved and how.
https://technofog.substack.com/p/day-3-of-the-sussmann-trial-baker?s=r DAY 3 Where James Baker is 100% confident he was lied to by Sussman, which is the actual charge in this case.
https://technofog.substack.com/p/hillary-clintons-media-strategy-revealed Day 4 In which it was confirmed under oath that Hillary personally approved a plan to make it seem Trump had colluded with Russia
https://technofog.substack.com/p/the-sussmann-trial-fingers-pointed?s=r Continuing here we see that the FBI "7th floor" leadership was pushing this just as hard as they had against Flynn (the case where the agent in charge decided it should be closed but it couldn't be because the Top brass insisted it be continued). It should be noted that Durham has cleaned up FBI corruption before.
I know we all want to see Hillary go down, but I imagine maybe this is continuing of old themes of Durham who has already had some experience trying to clean this particular swamp.
https://technofog.substack.com/p/how-fbi-hq-hamstrung-the-alfa-bank?s=r In which we see that they were unable to ever substantiate any of the allegations about Alfa Bank and Trump even though they had opened a very high level field investigation as if it were a true threat to the security of the Nation State.
https://technofog.substack.com/p/was-rodney-joffe-involved-in-the?s=r Where we see that the whole thing stank as much as the proverbial Denmark and that Joffe went around typical channels (likely because he was lying)
I love how the mainstream media who never actually apologized or corrected themselves over thrusting the Russia/Alphabank story on us now casually say things like "the now debunked data that purportedly linked Trump Tower to Alpha Bank". Anyhow, what I'm thinking I'm seeing in reporting and in all of that trial which obviously laid out more about the conspiracy than this lie he was charged with, is that this was never much about Sussman. I mean?! They made the jury disregard the only actual evidence of this lie. The games are afoot! https://www.cbsnews.com/news/michael-sussmann-trial-durham-verdict/
Wow. Thank you very much for all of this.
He knew they excluded best evidence of the actual crime Sussman was being tried for from consideration by the jury. He's very much a man who hasn't ever tried a case he thought he even might fail on, but, the factors here are different. If you read up about the case, day to day, it was MUCH more obviously laying out the conspiracy of it all than it ever was talking about if Sussman lied or if that was material (he did and it was) but there are bigger fish to fry here. They knew they had a suck jury and a judge who should have recused and didn't. And so they used what time they had to put into the judicial record the foundations of the worst corruption and biggest conspiracy seen in our government in a long time. It's also my personal recent theory that Durham is actually aiming to clear out the corruption in the FBI as much as anything. He has before.
Kash Patel was certain of a guilty verdict. I've been listening to his interviews the past week or so and he was emphatically declaring a guilty verdict!
I know. :( I understand some are talking about building to the big case but I'm sorry, this is just a frigging joke. How much of the left is honestly going to have a paradigm shift through this?
I love Bongino