Well you're right, but Mike Adams does a podcast every day. You're committed to coming up with something interesting, without going too far off the tracks. I wouldn't consider his Situation Update to be raw news, but he does draw your attention to some pretty interesting and serious things. Any of us would miss every once in awhile with a daily show.
I have mixed feelings. I do drop in from time to time, just out of curiosity. I used to be a regular visitor after I first discovered him, but then began to feel wary at his credulous approach to material when he began to address topics I was professionally familiar with. His desire to get out ahead of anyone else has taken a toll on his credibility, as he jumps to conclusions and goes off half-cocked. A little circumspection would help him a lot.
Nope dead bloody serious. You asked for an Authoritarian source. I gave you Zelinsky. I could also give you Obama, Von der Leyen, Klaus Analschwab and many more. All authoritarians by the general finition of the word. It will not give you any more factual data on the happenings, sorry to say.
I care not for Zelinky playing the piano with his dick. A copy cat, like Obama. Disgracefully not very authoritative. Unless of course, people listen to that shit and obey. ;-). It becomes the appearance of authoritativeness.
Sorry to say, but on the Ukraine front, I do not take Natural news as authoritative.
RT is not totally free of NATO/ western think-tank influence, you know ....
I agree. Natural News is prone to jump off the board at a moment's notice. Going off half-cocked seems to be their modus operandi.
Well you're right, but Mike Adams does a podcast every day. You're committed to coming up with something interesting, without going too far off the tracks. I wouldn't consider his Situation Update to be raw news, but he does draw your attention to some pretty interesting and serious things. Any of us would miss every once in awhile with a daily show.
I have mixed feelings. I do drop in from time to time, just out of curiosity. I used to be a regular visitor after I first discovered him, but then began to feel wary at his credulous approach to material when he began to address topics I was professionally familiar with. His desire to get out ahead of anyone else has taken a toll on his credibility, as he jumps to conclusions and goes off half-cocked. A little circumspection would help him a lot.
Who is your authority on Ukraine, then? u/redtoe-skipper, please share with us a specific source that you consider authoritarian.
I have to agree w/red toe here. NN lost a lot of credibility with me a long time ago.
I sub to Intel Slava Z and bioclandestine mostly for Ukraine info.
But appreciate the info, i like to hear it all and decide myself.
And as well, fren, I appreciate the extra info you have brought to the table.
Zelenski = authoritarian ... :-)
Oh, the comedian.
He's amazing playing the piano with his dick. Have you seen it?
I'll bet he gets all of his facts from Kolomoiskyy, who astroturfed him into the presidency. We should ask that guy.
Nope dead bloody serious. You asked for an Authoritarian source. I gave you Zelinsky. I could also give you Obama, Von der Leyen, Klaus Analschwab and many more. All authoritarians by the general finition of the word. It will not give you any more factual data on the happenings, sorry to say.
I care not for Zelinky playing the piano with his dick. A copy cat, like Obama. Disgracefully not very authoritative. Unless of course, people listen to that shit and obey. ;-). It becomes the appearance of authoritativeness.