Women are proving to be their own worst enemies. Tend and Befriending is the reason why women have allowed this incursion to occur. If only they championed their unique qualifications and embraced their God-given purpose, instead of being told they could have everything men have, they wouldn't be seeing transvestites entering their space.
Women in general (not all, but many), have allowed this woke bullshit to take root.
It became trendy for women to have gay, male friends, which helped start the mainstreaming of this. All the cable networks that cater towards women... E, TLC, DIY, Bravo, etc started pushing the shows featuring gay, then eventually trans people, and women ate that shit up.
Progressive, white women are currently the most destructive force, culturally and morally, on the planet.
They appropriately named it white guilt. Women are very empathetic which can be a great trait but at the same time they can put themselves in the shoes of white slave owners generations ago and feel like it is up to her to change the past
It seems you are quite right. When I say women have a proclivity of using a 'Tend' and 'Befriend' strategy of survival instead of 'Fight' or 'Flight', it is by empirical evidence. These contrasting attributes are gender specific and reflected in government policy. Myer-Levy of the University of Chicago Business School has provided us a method of analyzing male and female operants. Through her research she showed why women are easily sold fashion and men are not. In the simplest definition, it is the difference how women and men view the world. Are women easily influenced by fashions and trends so that they feel accepted? Are women’s decisions prejudiced as a result? In her study, she sums it up by stating women “integrate,” and **men “eliminate.”**1, 2 She further describes women as inclusive as opposed to exclusive. The author uses the words “affiliate” and “projected association” to describe the same. This correlates with the communal attributes of women in contrast to the individualistic traits found in men, especially Caucasian males. Myer-Levy’s “Selectivity hypothesis” is important because it reveals that feminine and masculine interpretation can be applied not only to advertising such as in magazine ads,3 but also to demographics as populations; businesses, governments, law, race, creed, culture, and religion.
It is in a politician's interest to foster a manipulated electorate and in the aggregate, women may be regarded as voting cattle. Indeed, women make it quite possible for control of the political landscape. The addition of women to the voting population makes modeling political and economic outcomes possible. This feat otherwise might not exist with, say, an all white male population (i.e. non-linear, male independence; each male prefers his own territory, etc.).
There are recent studies suggesting women are easily exploited. It appears women increasingly employ specious arguments and faulty reasoning to justify their actions. Kenski and Jamieson conducted surveys concerning knowledge of candidates during political campaigns in 1996 and 2000.1 During both campaigns men were more likely to answer questions about political issues correctly. In 1996, if women did not know the correct answers, they were more likely to say, “I don’t know.” In 2000, women were still more likely to answer more questions incorrectly, but were less likely to say, “I don’t know.” Jamieson declared, "Local news watching makes you dumber."2 This implies that women are more susceptible to propaganda, misinformation, political advertising/sound-bites, and the Big Lie. Another interesting relationship that appears to back up the gullibility claim involves the “Trends in International Math and Science Study” (TIMSS) assessments. TIMSS is the most comprehensive and rigorous assessment for reliable and timely data on the mathematics and science achievement of students. A surprising result showed that 12th grade girls scored lower on a third of the multiple choice questions than if they had guessed. This alludes that there was some factor that influenced them to answer the questions wrong. Was it false women’s intuition? Indeed, it is not that girls are stupid. On the contrary, women are bright and energetic counterparts to males. It appears to be another case of someone not knowing that they don’t know what they think they know.
When I say women have a proclivity of using a 'Tend' and 'Befriend' strategy of survival instead of 'Fight' or 'Flight', it is by empirical evidence.
So women, according to the Bible, are meant to be meek and supportive and loving and caring. If they aren't, they're everything that's wrong with the world today and the total cause of why we're in the predicament we're in. And yet when they act exactly how you're implying they're supposed to act they're suddenly WRONG for it? Which way do you want them to act, then? Do you want them to sit there and not speak until spoken to?
Are women easily influenced by fashions and trends so that they feel accepted?
I'm trying so hard not to lose my shit here. Are you insane?
Go ahead and take a look at golfers. Do they all wear the same exact kinds of clothes of the highest brands/status? How about businessmen? In fact, with golf, it's literally a requirement for no discernable reason other than appearance.
So...were the women influenced and decided to pick out all of their clothes, or were men just as easily swayed by fashion trends that ARE STILL ONGOING?
In her study, she sums it up by stating women “integrate,” and **men “eliminate.”
This makes no fucking sense.
This correlates with the communal attributes of women in contrast to the individualistic traits found in men, especially Caucasian males.
This also makes no fucking sense. Hurr durr all men are unique but all women are just the same.
This feat otherwise might not exist with, say, an all white male population (i.e. non-linear, male independence; each male prefers his own territory, etc.).
Which is exactly why loser men proudly proclaim themselves as alphas vs. betas, because all men are "individualistic". Seriously, you can look at a man and get an idea of his overall attitude. Some men are gentler and more meek than others, and that alone would influence their vote. The meeker man may want a calmer, kinder candidate while the one that sees himself as and prides himself on being an alpha would want the stronger, more abrasive candidate. These are extremely generalized examples, but you get my drift.
There are recent studies suggesting women are easily exploited. It appears women increasingly employ specious arguments and faulty reasoning to justify their actions.
This just in - men and women think differently, and apparently that means women are functionally retarded and easily manipulated. But don't worry, they aren't stupid (even though that's exactly what you're implying) - they're "bright and energetic".
You're so high up on your horse that you don't even know what you want out of women.
I regret you seem to not comprehend what was written in my post. I wrote the following that you seemed to have not read.
"On the contrary, women are bright and energetic counterparts to males. It appears to be another case of someone not knowing that they don’t know what they think they know."
That last sentence seems to be confirmed in your response. The information I posted are sourced by the following researchers. In other words, it's not my opinion. It's based on several academic studies. It's the same reason why women are targeted by advertisers. They are by far the largest TV demographic. Understanding 'why' this is reveals why women are targeted with lies by Marxist propagandists. It is mainly through women that's changing the fabric of this nation from one that is of liberty to one that is a promised 'safety'. Again, this is not my opinion, John R. Lott, Jr., Yale University Lawrence, and W. Kenny University of Florida published this study in Did Women’s Suffrage Change the Size and Scope of Government?.
-- Ibid. “Now, is that a male or a female ad?" she asked. . . "It's female. Look at the picture. It's just the Alps, and then they label it 'Our factory.' They're using a metaphor. . . Her point was that this is an ad that works only if the viewer appreciates all its elements-if the viewer integrates, not selects.”
-- Kathleen Hall Jamieson, “The Primary Campaign: What Did The Candidates Say, What Did The Public Learn, And Did It Matter?” Annenberg Public Policy Center at the University of Pennsylvania.
-- Samuel Silver, “The 'Gender Gap' explained: Robbing Peter & Paul to pay Mary!,” Jewish World Review Oct. 31, 2000/ 2 Mar-Cheshvan, 5761
-- Paul Recer, “New study says female brain is wired for emotion,” Washington (AP), Turhan Canli, John E. Desmond, Zuo Zhao and John D. E. Gabrieli are all authors of the study. www.salon.com/mwt/wire/2002/07/22/female_brain/index.html
-- Shelley E. Taylor, Laura Cousino Klein, Brian P. Lewis, Tara L. Gruenewald, Regan A. R. Gurung, and John A. Updegraff UCLA, “Biobehavioral Responses to Stress in Females: Tend-and-Befriend, Not Fight-or-Flight,”
-- The word – “integrate” means the female mental process of projected association (see Joan Levy-Myers research, “Females integrate, Men eliminate”). The author uses the words – “affiliate” and “projected association” to describe the same.
Why do you go straight to blaming women for being friendly, of all things, rather than the men that are gay in the first place?
lol do you really think women being friendly is what magically made more men gay? You should lay the blame where it belongs: the liberal agenda.
Progressive, white women are currently the most destructive force, culturally and morally, on the planet.
lol wut.
Liberals: Straight white men are everything wrong with this world!!
'Patriot': That's sexist AND racist and you're just pushing an agenda to ruin the world!
Same 'Patriot': Progressive white women are currently the most destructive force, culturally and morally, on the planet.
Women have been forced into the new "can have everything men have" mindset because of circumstance.
Husbands abandoning their families, rising costs of living requiring both spouses working (thus creating a drive to move forward in a career, because who wouldn't want to?), unable to marry a man because so many of them are total garbage (just like a lot of women are) or because they're traumatized by abusive men from previous relationships, being misunderstood and unappreciated for the work that they do...I could go on and on.
To assume that a woman shouldn't have what a man has is insane. Will a woman ever be as strong, or biologically the same? Of course not. But should a woman have the same rights as a man if she wants them? Yes. She's as human as a man and this mindset of women needing to be meek servants to men is exactly why we're in the position we're in. So, so many women get treated like crap by their men, whether it's their father or spouse. And when they DO fulfill their "God-given purpose" they get called naggy bitches and ball-and-chains. Damned if you do, damned if you don't I guess.
I am 100% for the great awakening but mindsets like yours also terrify me for my place in all of this.
I've been through enough rape and abuse for a lifetime. I don't want it magically being even more okay than it already is in the future.
Is no more true than wives abandoning their families. Contrary to the studies, the Marxist propagandists tell us otherwise. Shere Hite bragged on national TV: "70% of American wives commit adultery within 5 years of getting married".
Men are just pissed because trannies have social status above them, and now they and their kids are gonna be subject to the same sexual laws they previously placed on women and children when they declared “what a man does is his own business and ordained by God, himself.”
You fixen to learn.
Didn’t want see that half naked person? Didn’t wanna have those images in your mind? Didn’t wanna know people could be so depraved?
Awwww…. you’re not woman enough to get it, but also, damn (my) bitch…. why don’t YOU look and act like that…. it’s for me, after all….. the true alpha male?
Need to lose that fat, learn what pleases me, and perform for me with enthusiam.
Get ready to wiggle your ass for shekels, bc YOU allowed and cheered on all the naked women and degeneracy when it was only YOUR vice that held any sway.
Now globohomo is taking over, and it ain’t the wife the rapist is looking at😂.
Sounds like the words from the demi-goddess 'Lilith' herself. Notice I said "demi" meaning -- lesser. Remember behind the curtain, it is always a very powerful male that controls the levers of society. The entire vile and demented tapestry of social engineering and public policy is for destroying the Creator's Natural Order.
Women are proving to be their own worst enemies. Tend and Befriending is the reason why women have allowed this incursion to occur. If only they championed their unique qualifications and embraced their God-given purpose, instead of being told they could have everything men have, they wouldn't be seeing transvestites entering their space.
Women in general (not all, but many), have allowed this woke bullshit to take root.
It became trendy for women to have gay, male friends, which helped start the mainstreaming of this. All the cable networks that cater towards women... E, TLC, DIY, Bravo, etc started pushing the shows featuring gay, then eventually trans people, and women ate that shit up.
Progressive, white women are currently the most destructive force, culturally and morally, on the planet.
I never understood progressive white women fighting against white people. Like, you're white, what are you doing, retard?
The level of idiocy is beyond me.
They appropriately named it white guilt. Women are very empathetic which can be a great trait but at the same time they can put themselves in the shoes of white slave owners generations ago and feel like it is up to her to change the past
It seems you are quite right. When I say women have a proclivity of using a 'Tend' and 'Befriend' strategy of survival instead of 'Fight' or 'Flight', it is by empirical evidence. These contrasting attributes are gender specific and reflected in government policy. Myer-Levy of the University of Chicago Business School has provided us a method of analyzing male and female operants. Through her research she showed why women are easily sold fashion and men are not. In the simplest definition, it is the difference how women and men view the world. Are women easily influenced by fashions and trends so that they feel accepted? Are women’s decisions prejudiced as a result? In her study, she sums it up by stating women “integrate,” and **men “eliminate.”**1, 2 She further describes women as inclusive as opposed to exclusive. The author uses the words “affiliate” and “projected association” to describe the same. This correlates with the communal attributes of women in contrast to the individualistic traits found in men, especially Caucasian males. Myer-Levy’s “Selectivity hypothesis” is important because it reveals that feminine and masculine interpretation can be applied not only to advertising such as in magazine ads,3 but also to demographics as populations; businesses, governments, law, race, creed, culture, and religion.
It is in a politician's interest to foster a manipulated electorate and in the aggregate, women may be regarded as voting cattle. Indeed, women make it quite possible for control of the political landscape. The addition of women to the voting population makes modeling political and economic outcomes possible. This feat otherwise might not exist with, say, an all white male population (i.e. non-linear, male independence; each male prefers his own territory, etc.).
There are recent studies suggesting women are easily exploited. It appears women increasingly employ specious arguments and faulty reasoning to justify their actions. Kenski and Jamieson conducted surveys concerning knowledge of candidates during political campaigns in 1996 and 2000.1 During both campaigns men were more likely to answer questions about political issues correctly. In 1996, if women did not know the correct answers, they were more likely to say, “I don’t know.” In 2000, women were still more likely to answer more questions incorrectly, but were less likely to say, “I don’t know.” Jamieson declared, "Local news watching makes you dumber."2 This implies that women are more susceptible to propaganda, misinformation, political advertising/sound-bites, and the Big Lie. Another interesting relationship that appears to back up the gullibility claim involves the “Trends in International Math and Science Study” (TIMSS) assessments. TIMSS is the most comprehensive and rigorous assessment for reliable and timely data on the mathematics and science achievement of students. A surprising result showed that 12th grade girls scored lower on a third of the multiple choice questions than if they had guessed. This alludes that there was some factor that influenced them to answer the questions wrong. Was it false women’s intuition? Indeed, it is not that girls are stupid. On the contrary, women are bright and energetic counterparts to males. It appears to be another case of someone not knowing that they don’t know what they think they know.
Holy shit. Okay.
So women, according to the Bible, are meant to be meek and supportive and loving and caring. If they aren't, they're everything that's wrong with the world today and the total cause of why we're in the predicament we're in. And yet when they act exactly how you're implying they're supposed to act they're suddenly WRONG for it? Which way do you want them to act, then? Do you want them to sit there and not speak until spoken to?
I'm trying so hard not to lose my shit here. Are you insane?
Go ahead and take a look at golfers. Do they all wear the same exact kinds of clothes of the highest brands/status? How about businessmen? In fact, with golf, it's literally a requirement for no discernable reason other than appearance.
So...were the women influenced and decided to pick out all of their clothes, or were men just as easily swayed by fashion trends that ARE STILL ONGOING?
This makes no fucking sense.
This also makes no fucking sense. Hurr durr all men are unique but all women are just the same.
Which is exactly why loser men proudly proclaim themselves as alphas vs. betas, because all men are "individualistic". Seriously, you can look at a man and get an idea of his overall attitude. Some men are gentler and more meek than others, and that alone would influence their vote. The meeker man may want a calmer, kinder candidate while the one that sees himself as and prides himself on being an alpha would want the stronger, more abrasive candidate. These are extremely generalized examples, but you get my drift.
This just in - men and women think differently, and apparently that means women are functionally retarded and easily manipulated. But don't worry, they aren't stupid (even though that's exactly what you're implying) - they're "bright and energetic".
You're so high up on your horse that you don't even know what you want out of women.
I regret you seem to not comprehend what was written in my post. I wrote the following that you seemed to have not read.
That last sentence seems to be confirmed in your response. The information I posted are sourced by the following researchers. In other words, it's not my opinion. It's based on several academic studies. It's the same reason why women are targeted by advertisers. They are by far the largest TV demographic. Understanding 'why' this is reveals why women are targeted with lies by Marxist propagandists. It is mainly through women that's changing the fabric of this nation from one that is of liberty to one that is a promised 'safety'. Again, this is not my opinion, John R. Lott, Jr., Yale University Lawrence, and W. Kenny University of Florida published this study in Did Women’s Suffrage Change the Size and Scope of Government?.
-- Joan Meyers-Levy , “Mixed Messages - How Men And Women Differ In Their Responses To Marketing Messages,” http://gsbwww.uchicago.edu/news/capideas/sum98/meyers.htm
-- Malcolm Gladwell, “Listening to Khakis,” The New Yorker, http://www.gladwell.com/1997/1997_07_27_a_khaki.htm.
-- Ibid. “Now, is that a male or a female ad?" she asked. . . "It's female. Look at the picture. It's just the Alps, and then they label it 'Our factory.' They're using a metaphor. . . Her point was that this is an ad that works only if the viewer appreciates all its elements-if the viewer integrates, not selects.”
-- Kathleen Hall Jamieson, “The Primary Campaign: What Did The Candidates Say, What Did The Public Learn, And Did It Matter?” Annenberg Public Policy Center at the University of Pennsylvania.
-- Samuel Silver, “The 'Gender Gap' explained: Robbing Peter & Paul to pay Mary!,” Jewish World Review Oct. 31, 2000/ 2 Mar-Cheshvan, 5761
-- Paul Recer, “New study says female brain is wired for emotion,” Washington (AP), Turhan Canli, John E. Desmond, Zuo Zhao and John D. E. Gabrieli are all authors of the study. www.salon.com/mwt/wire/2002/07/22/female_brain/index.html
-- Shelley E. Taylor, Laura Cousino Klein, Brian P. Lewis, Tara L. Gruenewald, Regan A. R. Gurung, and John A. Updegraff UCLA, “Biobehavioral Responses to Stress in Females: Tend-and-Befriend, Not Fight-or-Flight,”
-- The word – “integrate” means the female mental process of projected association (see Joan Levy-Myers research, “Females integrate, Men eliminate”). The author uses the words – “affiliate” and “projected association” to describe the same.
Simp alert
Why do you go straight to blaming women for being friendly, of all things, rather than the men that are gay in the first place?
lol do you really think women being friendly is what magically made more men gay? You should lay the blame where it belongs: the liberal agenda.
lol wut.
Liberals: Straight white men are everything wrong with this world!! 'Patriot': That's sexist AND racist and you're just pushing an agenda to ruin the world! Same 'Patriot': Progressive white women are currently the most destructive force, culturally and morally, on the planet.
...
In the comments in this thread...which is it?:
Later in this topic: ... "Women are responsible for degenerate male behavior" https://greatawakening.win/p/15IETIOCRv/x/c/4OZopYO4gJM
...Or from another topic from earlier: ... "Stop blaming women for males behaving badly" https://greatawakening.win/p/13zgIz7l4d/x/c/4JFpVJ93OQl
Again, which is it?
Not all women are single moms, yet.
Okay, no.
Women have been forced into the new "can have everything men have" mindset because of circumstance.
Husbands abandoning their families, rising costs of living requiring both spouses working (thus creating a drive to move forward in a career, because who wouldn't want to?), unable to marry a man because so many of them are total garbage (just like a lot of women are) or because they're traumatized by abusive men from previous relationships, being misunderstood and unappreciated for the work that they do...I could go on and on.
To assume that a woman shouldn't have what a man has is insane. Will a woman ever be as strong, or biologically the same? Of course not. But should a woman have the same rights as a man if she wants them? Yes. She's as human as a man and this mindset of women needing to be meek servants to men is exactly why we're in the position we're in. So, so many women get treated like crap by their men, whether it's their father or spouse. And when they DO fulfill their "God-given purpose" they get called naggy bitches and ball-and-chains. Damned if you do, damned if you don't I guess.
I am 100% for the great awakening but mindsets like yours also terrify me for my place in all of this.
I've been through enough rape and abuse for a lifetime. I don't want it magically being even more okay than it already is in the future.
Well it sounds like a pretty bad situation. Yikes.
Is no more true than wives abandoning their families. Contrary to the studies, the Marxist propagandists tell us otherwise. Shere Hite bragged on national TV: "70% of American wives commit adultery within 5 years of getting married".
Men are just pissed because trannies have social status above them, and now they and their kids are gonna be subject to the same sexual laws they previously placed on women and children when they declared “what a man does is his own business and ordained by God, himself.”
You fixen to learn.
Didn’t want see that half naked person? Didn’t wanna have those images in your mind? Didn’t wanna know people could be so depraved?
Awwww…. you’re not woman enough to get it, but also, damn (my) bitch…. why don’t YOU look and act like that…. it’s for me, after all….. the true alpha male?
Need to lose that fat, learn what pleases me, and perform for me with enthusiam.
Get ready to wiggle your ass for shekels, bc YOU allowed and cheered on all the naked women and degeneracy when it was only YOUR vice that held any sway.
Now globohomo is taking over, and it ain’t the wife the rapist is looking at😂.
would hate to be you right about now
Also, cute * ass
Edit: *tight
Sounds like the words from the demi-goddess 'Lilith' herself. Notice I said "demi" meaning -- lesser. Remember behind the curtain, it is always a very powerful male that controls the levers of society. The entire vile and demented tapestry of social engineering and public policy is for destroying the Creator's Natural Order.
Fucking hell you people believe anything that gives you the ultimate dominance.
Once you comprehend it with your ego in check- then you’ll finally get it.
Behind the veil is a group of men that control it all. Women are their gynaeceum.