I was just reading an article on Epoch Times (See AnnaMAGA's post below) about the incoming population implosion. Pretty much all first world countries are in a serious population decline and the entire world is on the precipice of and trending towards non-replacement birth rates.
Almost all of this is due to left-wing indoctrination on many levels. Guilting women into careers over family, addiction to birth control, promoting gay life styles, gender dysphoria, abortion, addiction to materialistic things (money over family), etc.
They have their hooks into the majority of conservatives as well. Think of your conservative friends, family, and colleagues. How many of them have 3 or more children? Not many, right?
Conservatives dismiss most of the lies of the left, but they only need to fall for one to ruin their prospects of a large family. Which for us, usually comes down to making money and materialistic goods a priority over family.
We could decimate leftwing ideology in a generation, as they stop breeding and if we could convince conservatives to target 4 children.
I believe there is nothing more important right now for conservatives than these 2 things. 1 - Have at least 4 children. 2 - Be VERY active in their lives, set examples, and instill your values (if you don't, the left will).
I think people would quickly realize that there is no joy greater on this earth than having a large loving family.
Genesis 1:28. God always had a plan, we just need to listen.
Would that be enough for a genuine national defense?
Just looked into this and my wife and I just essentially started a huge research project over the weekend regarding this shit.
1913 to 1933 were some fucky times. Income tax, federal reserve, war, depression.
Interesting stuff. Wife is pretty based already but this got her redpilled on economics and things that she is just not interested in. Was fun to look into. She is at the why do we all just pay taxes phase? And I'm like do you want the script or the real answer lol
I’m curious. Did the states all ratify the Federal Reserve Act, because didn’t it change part of the constitution to define what was legal tender?
Yup.
And then the depression caused a federal reserve 2.0 patch
And then shit storm in the 70's caused a v3 patch
With each update making the federal reserve more powerful and the economy less laissez-faire.
The road to hell is paved with good intentions and all that. The reserve began with a pretty good idea that had in all reality a premise deserving of debate but it was not a frivolous thought, there was a need for it.
However within 20 years we fed the gremlin and the initial scope of what the intended purpose was had drastically changed and has since then even more so.
It's anyone's guess as to if it was created to solve a problem or if problems were created to help the federal reserve. But my personal guess is the latter at this point.
Oh yes, especially after they get rid of the warmongers and grifters in the Pentagon.
All the federal government is for is protecting the borders.
And assigning ambassadors, but then that's it.
If the military wasn’t embroiled in foreign conflicts and we got rid of social security and altered/revamped/eliminated Medicare/Medicaid then it would probably be enough.
Remember that the government is a sinkhole for money so eliminating departments and reducing foreign conflict involvement would do wonders for the budget and likely accommodate the elimination of income tax.
Boy, that sounds actually legal and constitutional, along the line of the 10th amendment.