Remember when Trump tried to regulate “bump stocks” via executive order, then the sixth circuit court of appeals denied it because it was unconstitutional? Precedence was set for gun regulation via EO. Seeing where we are now, this was one hell of a trap. 5D chess. Art of war. - The Great Awakening

Remember when Trump tried to regulate “bump stocks” via executive order, then the sixth circuit court of appeals denied it because it was unconstitutional? Precedence was set for gun regulation via EO. Seeing where we are now, this was one hell of a trap. 5D chess. Art of war. (media.greatawakening.win)

posted 2 years ago by MNisahellhole 2 years ago by MNisahellhole +378 / -2

38 comments download

38 comments share download save hide report block hide replies

You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.

Comments (38)

sorted by:

▲ 21 ▼

– ParkingLotRanger 21 points 2 years ago +21 / -0

I did too. At the time I thought, "Why is he doing that?" Now I can check that off my list (small list) of things I disagreed with Trump on. The other items are some of the people he put on his staff such as that warmonger Bolton.

permalink parent save report block reply

▲ 5 ▼

– Politiskep3 5 points 2 years ago +5 / -0

Bolton's easy, he needed to look like a warmonger himself to gain the respect of NK. Can't be a menace when you have doves advising you.

permalink parent save report block reply

▲ 3 ▼

– Cozette 3 points 2 years ago +3 / -0

When you are in a rough neighborhood and want to be safe do you have a Chihuahua on a leash or a pitbull?

President Trump wanted to incentivize peaceful negotiations with apex predators. Bolton snarling and begging to be let off his leash encouraged global predators to prefer doing things Trumps way.

Peaceniks like Rand Paul would be as easy to dismiss as a push over mom. All bark no bite. Ignored.

permalink parent save report block reply

To The Great Awakening

We are researchers who deal in open-source information, reasoned argument, and dank memes. We do battle in the sphere of ideas and ideas only. We neither need nor condone the use of force in our work here. WE ARE THE PUBLIC FACE OF Q. OUR MISSION IS TO RED-PILL NORMIES.

This is a pro-Q community. Please read and respect our rules below before contributing.

WHY Q?

"Those who cannot understand that we cannot simply start arresting w/o first: ensuring the safety & well-being of the population shifting the narrative removing those in DC through resignation to ensure success defeating ISIS/MS13 to prevent fail-safes freezing assets to remove network-to-network abilities kill off COC to prevent top-down comms/org, etc. etc. should not be participating in discussions." Q