Not a one of the "dirty dozen" anti-vax crowd - doctors Malone, McCullough, Mercola Martensen, Mikovits, Madej, Tenypenny, Ardis, Cole, Northrup, etc. have addressed the simple points made by doctors Lanka, Kaufman, Cowan, Bailey. They're literally all avoiding it like the plague. Malone did about a 90 second response on an interview where he just said "well of course viruses exist, we've been working with them for years"... and that was about it, as McCullough quietly nodded his head. The questioner didn't have the guts to push him on it by asking what he thought of Lanka's evidence (that all these virologists are just playing with decayed green monkey kidney cells and thinking that they're "viruses".
About 3 months ago, Steve Kirsch invited all of these prominent anti-vax people to do a live debate with Lanka/Kaufman/Cowan/Baileys (Sam & her husband Mark) to "end the controversy that is dividing the community". And the result?
All 5 of the "viruses don't exist" crew agreed to the debate at Steve's convenience. And precisely ZERO of these other "doctors" agreed to take part in it.
As far as I'm concerned, that's case closed. The only conclusion one can draw from this is that "Germ theory" is entirely indefensible --- because it's a fraud.
Thanks for paying attention and doing your own research. If you haven't seen the documentary "the viral delusion" which I posted within these comments, I highly recommend it to solidify your understanding.
Yep, nobody's willing to defend virology against people who know what they're talking about. All they can do is deny and dismiss without any grounds, and continue to defend the 150+ year old lie brought to us by Pasteur.
Steve Kirsch wanted to "shut us all up", sure that his team was right, when he put that request out. Ironically, weekly he complains that nobody is willing to debate him about the deadly effects of the jab. And rightly so, it's indefensible. But he's still sticking to his belief in viruses, even though the same thing he complains about (nobody to defend the jab), is also true for the pro-virus crowd he supports.
As it has been 2 years now since Dr. Lanka wrote his paper "The misconception called virus", I think the case is closed. All the establishment virologists have had more than enough time to refute his findings. But instead, in unison they've all chosen to ignore it.....because they can't refute it.
Yep, he's by the far the clearest and most precise among them. His logic can't be refuted.
Ironically, he's about the only one who consistently says "I'll be happy to change my mind if someone can produce evidence to the contrary". While practically everybody else has just dug their heals into the "germs of the air"....sigh
Bingo.
Not a one of the "dirty dozen" anti-vax crowd - doctors Malone, McCullough, Mercola Martensen, Mikovits, Madej, Tenypenny, Ardis, Cole, Northrup, etc. have addressed the simple points made by doctors Lanka, Kaufman, Cowan, Bailey. They're literally all avoiding it like the plague. Malone did about a 90 second response on an interview where he just said "well of course viruses exist, we've been working with them for years"... and that was about it, as McCullough quietly nodded his head. The questioner didn't have the guts to push him on it by asking what he thought of Lanka's evidence (that all these virologists are just playing with decayed green monkey kidney cells and thinking that they're "viruses".
About 3 months ago, Steve Kirsch invited all of these prominent anti-vax people to do a live debate with Lanka/Kaufman/Cowan/Baileys (Sam & her husband Mark) to "end the controversy that is dividing the community". And the result?
All 5 of the "viruses don't exist" crew agreed to the debate at Steve's convenience. And precisely ZERO of these other "doctors" agreed to take part in it.
As far as I'm concerned, that's case closed. The only conclusion one can draw from this is that "Germ theory" is entirely indefensible --- because it's a fraud.
Thanks for paying attention and doing your own research. If you haven't seen the documentary "the viral delusion" which I posted within these comments, I highly recommend it to solidify your understanding.
Cheers!
Damn. I did not know about this. I haven't watched the videos posted but hearing this commentary is... compounding.
Yep, nobody's willing to defend virology against people who know what they're talking about. All they can do is deny and dismiss without any grounds, and continue to defend the 150+ year old lie brought to us by Pasteur.
Steve Kirsch wanted to "shut us all up", sure that his team was right, when he put that request out. Ironically, weekly he complains that nobody is willing to debate him about the deadly effects of the jab. And rightly so, it's indefensible. But he's still sticking to his belief in viruses, even though the same thing he complains about (nobody to defend the jab), is also true for the pro-virus crowd he supports.
As it has been 2 years now since Dr. Lanka wrote his paper "The misconception called virus", I think the case is closed. All the establishment virologists have had more than enough time to refute his findings. But instead, in unison they've all chosen to ignore it.....because they can't refute it.
Elvis has left the building...
I agree. Kaufman has been clear and precise and making a lot of sense since day one of this coof shit show. Virus? What virus? How about exosomes?
Yep, he's by the far the clearest and most precise among them. His logic can't be refuted.
Ironically, he's about the only one who consistently says "I'll be happy to change my mind if someone can produce evidence to the contrary". While practically everybody else has just dug their heals into the "germs of the air"....sigh