Any time "plausible deniability" is used by our side, I can only think of the other side which uses "plausible deniability" as a shield against being held to account for all of their crimes.
I assure you that I will always reject "plausible deniability" from anyone on our side on that basis alone.
So, you think that Trump should have just come out and said to everyone "Sure, I'm Q+. We have a highly controlled intelligence operation and its happening now via 8 chan, and yeah, I'm Q+. Washington Post, do you have any questions on that?"
Plausible deniability is a strategy, and is neutral. Like being deliberately vague. And, as neutral, it can be used for either good, or for evil.
I definitely don't think Kash should be going on podcasts saying that we have to do the heavy lifting when we are told several things from "you are watching a movie" to being pacified on the daily because of a plan that has not only not come to fruition on the second year of this, but with an increasing amount of distrust and disdain for our fellow countrymen and women.
The fact that more and more people are expecting a civil war to start is not a good sign. It means that both sides don't see any bridge to this gap, and the gap is widening further every day.
The question is this, in all realistic avenues:
How many people have to die from the pressures of vaccination as a requirement to work?
How many kids?
The conversation and polling continues to drift towards mandatory and forced vaccinations, and it is not doing this for no reason.
How many people have to go broke and lose their homes or livelihoods? How many people have to struggle to make ends meet just to buy a gallon of gas to drive to work every day, or put food on the table because everything from produce to meat to even fast food bullshit continues to rapidly rise.
How many FFLs have to be revoked and stores closed down for things as small as a single fixable typo?
How many people have to be denied guns indirectly by the federal government slow walking their background checks etc. while they wait for more gun control legislation?
How many elections need to be stolen?
How many RINOs need to stab us in the back at totally predictable high impact times?
There are so many factors at play that make this a shit place to live right now.
If nothing can stop what is coming, if we are watching a movie, our participation is not needed.
If our participation is needed, then we could have handled it as a country without being pacified, and something can stop what is coming.
It is tiring watching every loss we suffer or every negative we see being handwaved away as "playing a role", "watching a movie", "disinformation is necessary", "the ending won't be for everyone".
The entire country is suffering to varying degrees, and letting it continue will cease to have any intended effect as public would hate them for allowing this to happen.
It is a fine line to allow someone to be jaded enough to hate something, but not jaded so much as to hate everything. We as a country are trending towards the latter, and that's not good.
So TL;DR: If you're not going to come out and say Q is real and that there is a plan, stop going on to podcasts and devaluing the sentiment unless we were all played.
Um, you shoulda put the TLDR at the beginning, not at the end. Because, if it was really TLDR, no one gets to where you are.
Anyway, yeah, I dunno. I don't think your sentiments are particularly unreasonable. But also, I don't run my life based on what DJT or Kash or Q or Fred Jones says. I take the information in, I accept that I will likely never see the whole picture, I choose what I should be doing based on the information that comes to me and my own personal evaluation of it.
Might work at chasing down the whole interview, tho. I've been listening to a bunch of Kash interviews recently, and I'm pretty happy with what I hear.
No, I mean they're polling more about it, not necessarily in favor of it. They're pushing the envelope, testing the waters and keeping it in the public sphere which is something the deep state excels at before they do something.
Any time "plausible deniability" is used by our side, I can only think of the other side which uses "plausible deniability" as a shield against being held to account for all of their crimes.
I assure you that I will always reject "plausible deniability" from anyone on our side on that basis alone.
Your choice.
So, you think that Trump should have just come out and said to everyone "Sure, I'm Q+. We have a highly controlled intelligence operation and its happening now via 8 chan, and yeah, I'm Q+. Washington Post, do you have any questions on that?"
Plausible deniability is a strategy, and is neutral. Like being deliberately vague. And, as neutral, it can be used for either good, or for evil.
In my view.
I definitely don't think Kash should be going on podcasts saying that we have to do the heavy lifting when we are told several things from "you are watching a movie" to being pacified on the daily because of a plan that has not only not come to fruition on the second year of this, but with an increasing amount of distrust and disdain for our fellow countrymen and women.
The fact that more and more people are expecting a civil war to start is not a good sign. It means that both sides don't see any bridge to this gap, and the gap is widening further every day.
The question is this, in all realistic avenues:
How many people have to die from the pressures of vaccination as a requirement to work?
How many kids?
The conversation and polling continues to drift towards mandatory and forced vaccinations, and it is not doing this for no reason.
How many people have to go broke and lose their homes or livelihoods? How many people have to struggle to make ends meet just to buy a gallon of gas to drive to work every day, or put food on the table because everything from produce to meat to even fast food bullshit continues to rapidly rise.
How many FFLs have to be revoked and stores closed down for things as small as a single fixable typo?
How many people have to be denied guns indirectly by the federal government slow walking their background checks etc. while they wait for more gun control legislation?
How many elections need to be stolen?
How many RINOs need to stab us in the back at totally predictable high impact times?
There are so many factors at play that make this a shit place to live right now.
If nothing can stop what is coming, if we are watching a movie, our participation is not needed.
If our participation is needed, then we could have handled it as a country without being pacified, and something can stop what is coming.
It is tiring watching every loss we suffer or every negative we see being handwaved away as "playing a role", "watching a movie", "disinformation is necessary", "the ending won't be for everyone".
The entire country is suffering to varying degrees, and letting it continue will cease to have any intended effect as public would hate them for allowing this to happen.
It is a fine line to allow someone to be jaded enough to hate something, but not jaded so much as to hate everything. We as a country are trending towards the latter, and that's not good.
So TL;DR: If you're not going to come out and say Q is real and that there is a plan, stop going on to podcasts and devaluing the sentiment unless we were all played.
My theory on the Truth Social Q and Kash is that they are using “Q” to capture an audience and sell a book.
Plausible. If so, though, that creates a major problem.
ROFL.
Um, you shoulda put the TLDR at the beginning, not at the end. Because, if it was really TLDR, no one gets to where you are.
Anyway, yeah, I dunno. I don't think your sentiments are particularly unreasonable. But also, I don't run my life based on what DJT or Kash or Q or Fred Jones says. I take the information in, I accept that I will likely never see the whole picture, I choose what I should be doing based on the information that comes to me and my own personal evaluation of it.
Might work at chasing down the whole interview, tho. I've been listening to a bunch of Kash interviews recently, and I'm pretty happy with what I hear.
Not common structure. But I can see the argument, fren.
NO POLLING is drifting to mandatory vaccines.
UNCONSTITUTIONAL.
No, I mean they're polling more about it, not necessarily in favor of it. They're pushing the envelope, testing the waters and keeping it in the public sphere which is something the deep state excels at before they do something.
In response to how many people?
Look no further than the Great Depression. Those people suffered.
You are most where near that.
Our country is in a worse state overall. Perhaps not on an individual level, but as a collective level the country is dying and doing so very rapidly.