Satanists (KM, Rothschilds, name stealers) have infiltrated the following:
- Israel/Zionists (research Netanyahu and his family; also Kissinger, Schwab backgrounds)
- Catholic Church (research the Pope, his WW2 background, Jesuits, images of Vatican auditorium that look like serpent)
- Saudi Arabia (research House of Saud and their true origin, as well as the massive human trafficking that was going on in SA until 2017)
- Church of England (research infiltration by Catholics as punishment for breakaway; see UK Royals direct involvement in changes)
- Protestant Church (research infiltration by Catholics as punishment for breakaway and Megachurch pastors involvement in pedophilia)
- Mormon Church (research Mitt Romney and his ties to Ukraine; also research current Mormon Church leadership and look at infiltration going on in Utah)
Just a comment:
As far as I know, Q never directly referenced this information. So while the information may be true, I think it's important to recognize that point; Q never directly referenced this information (i.e. naming of "Khazarian Mafia").
In this sense, such information/theory is separate to Q, like, for example, Adrenochrome, operation looking glass.
Recognizing this point should be a matter of intellectual discipline; it is not to say the information is false, but when the lines get blurred about Q's message and other content/theories in the 'truth movement', the potentials for derailment or distraction are amplified.
Since when does Q have to directly reference anything? Ffs. There’s tons of digs on these topics and history going way back.
Q is not our leader. We are the leaders.
So..... what's your point?
And, have you read the sidebar recently?
Even if you are not aware of it, there are direct and present serious efforts by certain actors to undermine the Q movement. One tactic they use is to get a whole bunch of people discussing, adding to and promoting narratives as Q content that is, in fact, not Q content.
The Media "Qanon" hit pieces are FULL of that stuff. If you're not seeing that, you should expand your focus.
The distinction I make is valuable. It has nothing to do with the validity of the topic in itself. However, this board is not conspiracy.win.
I never asserted that the topic should not be discussed. I simply said its valuable and important to draw distinctions and be clear about what is, and isn't, Q.
It's funny you object to that, Jeff.
Q team is in direct war with them so he likely knows. The distinction is up to us to suss out.
Very important point that I find myself making (obliquely) quite often to Pink pilled people who dismiss Q as "Trash" because the well has been "poisoned" by MSM.
Again, not to say it's false information... But regardless, it's been twisted to compromise the Q movement by MSM.
Glad you said so. Because that has been an increasing concern for me. I've encountered so many people that have been woken up into the Great Awakening sphere on the back of Covid19 Scamdemic. They don't have the several years of close Q research that older anons have, and they fall victim to a lot of nonsense.
Such nonsense is not without a toll. Consider how many still think that Lin Woods is a patriot, or that Nesara is, yeah, gonna take place in the next few weeks. There is a real human cost to the disinfo/misinfo content that makes its way into the Awakened truth sphere.
That is sometimes worth pointing out. Right now though, it just sounds like you're trying to cast doubt on OP's premise.
The whole point of the Q operation was to send anons down rabbit holes. Khazarian mafia is one of the bigger rabbit holes.
But is it one that Q sent us down?
I've been playing close attention to Q since Jan 2018, so why is it I've just heard about the Khazarian mafia this year, via folks like Clif High, for example?
I found High's introduction and discussion of the Khazars fascinating. BUt really, I have not dug enough on this to really know what is what, and well, yes, I currently put it in the "there is quite likely to be something to this, but I don't have enough data to really put too much confidence into people's views or conclusions".
There are many things which, via Q and via other channels, I have full confidence about. The Khazars being the name stealers that infiltrated each and every organization is not one of them.
There are also many topics out there that many people have hard and fast convictions about, convictions expressed as certainty, that I am quite confident aren't clearly or properly understood.
The OP's premise is certainly not helped by the fact that he/she makes very, very bold assertions and gives zero reference or source. How to take seriously someone who makes bold and hard statements as if fact, and yet provides ZERO data to corroborate?
So, yeah, I guess, sign me skeptical of the frame of these assertions until I have more info. Maybe it's just my conditioning under Q, but [hard assertions + zero references, source, evidence] just triggers my "be careful here" red flag.
When such red flags are raised, I adopt the practice of sticking to what I know, and knowing a lot about Q (enough to qualify my analytical thresholds), I'll naturally fall back on: This is a Q board. Did Q actually lead us or guide anons to the "Khazarian" narrative?
If I missed it, I'm all ears. But in the absence of information and knowledge, I place a lot more stock in Q than I do in folks like Clif High (who, no fault of his own, has his own way of looking at things and his own worldview) or others.
I know the Khazar narrative is popular these days. But the truth sphere is ALSO awash with deliberate disinformation not to mention certain theories and ideas that certain people latch onto because they believe it, and hold it to be true.
Just spend a few days combing through the GAW board will reveal how true that is.
I guess my particular interpretation of due diligence and caution isn't popular in some area?
Anyway, maybe I'll learn more. With the world tumbling down the rabbit hole as it currently is, my desire to do deeper digs focusing on less than practical topics is kind of on the wane at the moment!!!
But thanks for the comment fren. It's given me food for thought. (I guess I should have lead with that... derp)