Apparently that's not the issue. 16th amendment ratified or not, SCOTUS has apparently stated that it wasn't even necessary--that the government was always able to tax income from any source.
The scam was making everyday ignorant Americans think that their work wages counted as income. But the SCOTUS definition of income clearly excludes that. So we're literally all just paying taxes on our wages because...well...we're stupid.
No, not possible.
It takes a new amendment to cancel a previously passed amendment.
The 16th was not legally ratified, if they rule the process was unlawful then it falls on its own.
I don't believe it will happen, but while we're hoping.
Well . . . dayum. That's a solid idea, I think.
Took a minute to find,
If this is documented as claimed, all they would have to do is allow it to be presented.
Talk about s conflict of interest though, as all judges feed from the 16th hog trough.
https://michaelruark.blog/2020/09/12/states-did-not-legally-ratify-the-16th-amendment/
Wow, great find.
Yes: If the content holds up, there is no question but that fuckery was involved and the 16th is just as legit as Biden's Presidency.
Thanks for sharing. I encourage you to create a Post for it.
Understood, thanks.
The 16th was never legally ratified, if they rule the process was unlawful then it falls on its own.
https://michaelruark.blog/2020/09/12/states-did-not-legally-ratify-the-16th-amendment/
I don't believe it will happen, but while we're hoping.
Apparently that's not the issue. 16th amendment ratified or not, SCOTUS has apparently stated that it wasn't even necessary--that the government was always able to tax income from any source.
The scam was making everyday ignorant Americans think that their work wages counted as income. But the SCOTUS definition of income clearly excludes that. So we're literally all just paying taxes on our wages because...well...we're stupid.