We post what we know and can prove. Military tribunals, tunnels, aliens, and whatever else fantastical is just that.. FANTASTICAL! We are here to spread truth and the truth is WE LET THIS SHIT HAPPEN AND WE HAVE TO FIX IT!! Without us, nothing changes, so get your head into reality and the fight for truth, or please at least, stop leading others away into believing we can sit back and get saved. We must do it ourselves and THE TRUTH WILL SET US FREE!!! FFS! Come on people, please.
π€‘π€‘π€‘EDIT: please feel free to attach all your open source info proving the fantastical. We will look. Q SENT US TO USE OPEN SOURCE INFO!!! This is not that hard.
DIDN'T Y'ALL SEE WHAT CLANDESTINE SAID? ALL πππππ ON US NOW!!! WE CAN DEBATE THE REST AFTER WE WIN!!
π―π― If you find yourself triggered by something this simple, you need to toughen up folks. Your enemies don't care. π€£π€£πΏπΏ
We post evidence. Evidence is not proof. Proof is a decision. Each person decides for themselves if the evidence is sufficient to meet some burden of proof (e.g. preponderance of the evidence, beyond a reasonable doubt, etc.).
To "prove" something in the way I think you mean it, means that you have met the burden of proof "beyond a reasonable doubt" for every singe entity that exists, and I suggest that is impossible. Thus, we only ever show the evidence, then we debate the evidence. This is the path to Truth. This is how science does it, this is how courts of law do it, this is how all investigations into the Truth do it.
So if we have evidence of "Military tribunals, tunnels, aliens, and whatever else" we can, just like we do with every other investigation into the Truth, present the evidence, and debate the evidence. By this path we can get closer to the Truth of a thing. If we ignore, or censor, or prevent from seeing any evidence, all we do is ignore, censor, or prevent from seeing the Truth, and I suggest that is not what we want.
The Debate is the king of "proof." It is through the debate that we get closer to that. This is why we should never censor evidence, and never silence debate, no matter where they go, as long as they are intent on the Truth in earnest.
Good post. Nothing Is real until you experience it. Like I've always said. We guess 100 percent of the time. Yet sometimes we are correct. Educated and discerned for sure, but guesses are guesses.
Disagree. I've learned a lot of stuff just from Trump and Q that I never thought could be real. That didn't make it unreal. It just meant that some ppl knew it first.
Knowing information and experiencing the information are two different things.
If I told you about a surgery in detail, showed you a video even of an actual surgery like the one you needed then you have info. Not experiential, just cognitive info, stuff you can process and even comprehend. But until you get that surgery you haven't experienced it. I may not have been clear so maybe we weren't speaking about the same thing.
Trump put 250 million in upgrading GITMO for 15 terrorist? Prison barges seen off GITMO? NG on shifts there from different states? We can look at satellite photos of the upgrades. Court TV back on. These are all reality. We can surmise that things are being set up or are already happening.
Yes I also surmise and in that case we can even experience it if we use the knowledge to discern what is happening. Connected to that knowledge. But even the info you have stated, you haven't experienced. You have only experienced hearing about it.
For years people waited the messiah their hope and ours too, then he came and they experienced it.
We all register effects, some of us analyze and surmise and intuit what it all means. And we have Q to guide us and to have signpost interpreting the show.
Greatest time in history, rest and watch the largest production in the planet. Stay thankful, let the history unfold before you.
Q said we know more than we think.
Indeed he did. But how does that fact help us now? That is the question. Focus on what we can prove which is staggering enough.
So Nana you are saying to not have Faith. In anything. Without factual proof. Well continue on with your lifestyle that way but you don't need to make flaming angry posts to those of us who have it.
No. I am saying stop talking about improbable or improbable stuff right now because there's an overwhelming amount of actual open source information that really needs dissemination. This is the last time I'll answer this. I've been clear.
Very well said. Far too often some link to an article or blog somewhere is "proof" provided and then derailed off topic in discussion to then be later stated or re referenced in a group think context and presented as "we" proved/debunked that long ago e.g.
Yes, a very good point/clarification. There is no such thing as "debunked." "Debunked" is a fraud. A rebuttal does not tell you the Truth. New evidence, new arguments, are always allowed in the investigation into the Truth. The debate is never "closed."
Just because something is "beyond a reasonable doubt" for you today, doesn't mean new evidence won't bring a reasonable doubt tomorrow.
Thanks, immutable truth and maliable facts.