We post what we know and can prove. Military tribunals, tunnels, aliens, and whatever else fantastical is just that.. FANTASTICAL! We are here to spread truth and the truth is WE LET THIS SHIT HAPPEN AND WE HAVE TO FIX IT!! Without us, nothing changes, so get your head into reality and the fight for truth, or please at least, stop leading others away into believing we can sit back and get saved. We must do it ourselves and THE TRUTH WILL SET US FREE!!! FFS! Come on people, please.
π€‘π€‘π€‘EDIT: please feel free to attach all your open source info proving the fantastical. We will look. Q SENT US TO USE OPEN SOURCE INFO!!! This is not that hard.
DIDN'T Y'ALL SEE WHAT CLANDESTINE SAID? ALL πππππ ON US NOW!!! WE CAN DEBATE THE REST AFTER WE WIN!!
π―π― If you find yourself triggered by something this simple, you need to toughen up folks. Your enemies don't care. π€£π€£πΏπΏ
I guess I thought this forum was for βthe great awakeningβ, not Q research only? If you limit it, then you would have to ban/delete 90% of the shit posted because it might not correlate to a Q drop.
You do realize this is what fucking Reddit does to slide and silence the truth, right? Reddit should never be a model followed by anyone. Fucking bots and liberal cunts galore. Maybe you donβt remember what happened to the OG great awakening forum there?
Personally, I appreciate a variety content. Itβs not my place to be the truth or awakening police. Why? Because Iβm smart enough to know I donβt fucking know anything for sure. After spending my life in the medical field it was disheartening to figure out itβs all lies pushed by pharma bros. Very humbling.
Everyone here is in their own stage of awakening and the full truth involves far more than Q drops, IMHO.
A variety of content is fine, I don't believe that's what NanaQ45 is concerned about.
She's concerned about the number of posts positing ideas that have no firm connection to events, proof or reality. There's a lack of critical thinking and diligence.
One example, albeit an extreme one: The obsession that a small number of posters have with the idea that JFK Jr. is still alive. I've even seen a mod on here promote this idea. There's zero evidence to support this theory, Q has in no uncertain terms stated that JFK Jr. is no longer with us and worse, those types of discussion topics are used against us in the mainstream to paint us as lunatics.
Variety is fine as there's a broad tapestry of events that lead to the great awakening. But it is disheartening to some of us to see ideas posited in serious threads with no connection to reality. Equally so to see things stated as fact that are far from it.
I don't want to interpret NQ45's words for her, but my take away is that her request is for better research and more critical thinking, and I think that the addition of both would be a positive development for this board.
Thank you! Well said!
Thank you, NanaQ. Pains me that there are people downvoting you.
Thank you but I honestly don't care. They're triggered, fighting over nonsense and proving my point; or They're actually linking to something. So, I win either way.
Your last point about everyone being in their own stage of awakening is a very good one. We must be gracious with each other. On the other hand I understand Nana's concern, but even though I understand it, I don't necessarily agree with the level of hysteria (in CAPITAL LETTERS). We are not going to get a break from the compromised media no matter what we do. Every post could be serious and well-researched with a thousand credible sources, and they would still call us idiots and conspiracy theorists. I'd say, don't worry about it. Bad press is still press, and it brings Cinderella to the ball.
I notice two things: 1. Nana is not calling for censorship but for self-regulation, and 2. that self-regulation is all about things Nana judges to be unworthy of this forum. I get what Nana is saying. I understand that optics are a thing, but although it might be good to consider the impact of a proposition, we shouldn't be censoring ourselves because we might be harshly judged. That is what the PC crowd are taught to do in socialist university, and it does not lead to the truth, which is what we are all searching to uncover and present to the world.
I personally like the variety of content hereββand the variety of opinion. I also like people being able to say "you are wrong" in a civil context. I do not like it when the discourse becomes uncivil between ourselves, and I think that reflects badly on us when it happens. Of course, I'm not talking about the treatment of glowing shills who come in here to start trouble. Let them get what they deserve. But in terms of GA population, I think we should make a distinction between actual doomers who think we're all in a handbag and won't be convinced otherwise, and people who have just gotten discouraged and need a bit of help to get up and get back in the fight.
It's not such a bad idea to take a personal inventory from time to time to see how well we cling to the courses we set for ourselves. Posts like this one open that conversation, and I don't think it's a bad thing. Having said that, it is my opinion that it makes no sense to look to lying media organizations to legitimize us. We do not receive our legitimacy from them. They receive the proof of their illegitimacy from us.
Thank you! You get it!
Ditto, Jules.