I know for certain that this is an untrue statement. I don't know how often it happens, but I know that it does, and have seen it happen at least a dozen times myself, whether you realize it or not.
Yep, happened to me.
You and I have had our disagreements, Slyver, but we are united 100% on this issue.
GAW does, in fact, have mods who censor topics and opinions they do not like, having nothing at all to do with violating any terms of the website.
It's not about topics we don't "like," but topics which are clearly not on Q, such as Flat Earth, chemtard BS ("Spain" doesn't account for the lines over your house) and all other assorted garbage. This WIN rules because it is kept on track. Our mod log is open to the public.
Let me ask you a hypothetical. What if it turns out that "Chemtrails" are real. This is just a hypothetical, I'm not going to post on the mountains of evidence to support it. If it is real, and an active play against We The People, isn't such censorship harming people? Don't we need to know? Maybe if it is real, we can find ways of reducing the damage it does to our lives. There is no way to know if the topic is silenced.
Now let's say its not real, how can we know if we aren't allowed to debate the evidence? HOW CAN WE KNOW???
If the debate is silenced, we can't really understand the full agenda of the Cabal. We can't really understand what it is we need to focus on, and fight against. Censorship of dissenting topics never aids in an investigation into the Truth.
If it's on Q, and if Q were to direct us to take it seriously and talk about it, it would be all over this WIN.
Still waiting for info on how the chemtrail team somehow covers the skies in every corner of the country... Waiting for how they turn it off and on of its an additive in the fuel... Waiting for photos of the injection hardware installed en mass in commercial aircraft
Show me THAT and I'll sticky this shit all over the place 24/7 for a week straight
Your beliefs of "what is true" are irrelevant. The evidence either supports something or it doesn't. The evidence is the evidence is the evidence. If people aren't allowed to present evidence, how can you possibly see it? How can anyone see it? How can we debate it?
You are making yourself The Arbiter of Truth. You aren't helping anyone by silencing evidence you think is bunk, you are harming an honest investigation into the Truth. If you think the evidence is bunk, present evidence to the contrary. Protesting "but why haven't we seen X, Y, and Z" is not an argument against evidence.
Let me give you an example you might appreciate.
"How can Pizzagate be real if there is no basement!?!"
How often do we see exactly this argument. If evidence of the basement is censored, the belief continues ad infinitum. This is exactly the same type of action of censorship you are promoting with your "disbelief" argument (and power to censor).
Yep, happened to me.
You and I have had our disagreements, Slyver, but we are united 100% on this issue.
GAW does, in fact, have mods who censor topics and opinions they do not like, having nothing at all to do with violating any terms of the website.
Those mods should be identified and rooted out.
It's not about topics we don't "like," but topics which are clearly not on Q, such as Flat Earth, chemtard BS ("Spain" doesn't account for the lines over your house) and all other assorted garbage. This WIN rules because it is kept on track. Our mod log is open to the public.
Let me ask you a hypothetical. What if it turns out that "Chemtrails" are real. This is just a hypothetical, I'm not going to post on the mountains of evidence to support it. If it is real, and an active play against We The People, isn't such censorship harming people? Don't we need to know? Maybe if it is real, we can find ways of reducing the damage it does to our lives. There is no way to know if the topic is silenced.
Now let's say its not real, how can we know if we aren't allowed to debate the evidence? HOW CAN WE KNOW???
If the debate is silenced, we can't really understand the full agenda of the Cabal. We can't really understand what it is we need to focus on, and fight against. Censorship of dissenting topics never aids in an investigation into the Truth.
If it's on Q, and if Q were to direct us to take it seriously and talk about it, it would be all over this WIN.
Still waiting for info on how the chemtrail team somehow covers the skies in every corner of the country... Waiting for how they turn it off and on of its an additive in the fuel... Waiting for photos of the injection hardware installed en mass in commercial aircraft
Show me THAT and I'll sticky this shit all over the place 24/7 for a week straight
Your beliefs of "what is true" are irrelevant. The evidence either supports something or it doesn't. The evidence is the evidence is the evidence. If people aren't allowed to present evidence, how can you possibly see it? How can anyone see it? How can we debate it?
You are making yourself The Arbiter of Truth. You aren't helping anyone by silencing evidence you think is bunk, you are harming an honest investigation into the Truth. If you think the evidence is bunk, present evidence to the contrary. Protesting "but why haven't we seen X, Y, and Z" is not an argument against evidence.
Let me give you an example you might appreciate.
How often do we see exactly this argument. If evidence of the basement is censored, the belief continues ad infinitum. This is exactly the same type of action of censorship you are promoting with your "disbelief" argument (and power to censor).
My guy, these mods were so petty that they took away my pepe avatar. Why? Probably for questioning the religious hivemind here.
Get the mods butthurt and they act accordingly.