But the only question before the Court is more narrow: whether the “best system of emission reduction” iden- tified by EPA in the Clean Power Plan was within the authority granted to the Agency in Section 111(d) of the Clean Air Act. For the reasons given, the answer is no.
They are specifically addressing the Clean Power Plan.
There's a secondary point you bring up here that I'd encourage everyone to look at when they get time. Whenever there's a 6-3 ruling that involves Roberts doing his effing job that leaves the 3 liberals to write the dissent, their prose is disturbingly laughable.
Many of you will be shocked (I know I was) at how laughably emotional many of their dissenting pieces are. Often there's very little reference to any kind of precedent, just whining. This isn't always the case, but it is the case a disturbingly large amount of time.
Kagan and Sotomayor are well known for their decisions being emotional and not having any legal substance whatsoever. How they became judges, let alone Supreme Court justices is beyond me
As we have seen many times: "Our rights do not stop at your feelings!" I read the opinions a while ago and this one is pure SJW all the way and NOT covered in any way by the Consitution that I can see.
Similar to the gun rights case where the court did not throw out gun licensing as unconstitutional, rather, it only threw out requiring a showing of a specific need in order to get a license
Sure, but there are lots of other ""Rules"", that they simply invented out of thin air, and pushed on the States and Public....
I'm hopeful that the Catalytic Converters and Diesel Exhaust Fluid{literally Piss and Distilled Water}, are two of those things that can be 100% tossed out....
It'll drive the climate Change Glowies wildly insane, and within 1 year, we will all benefit from larger Plant Produce and Production.....
That’s a quote from Kagan’s dissent.
The bottom of page 6 has the court’s opinion:
They are specifically addressing the Clean Power Plan.
There's a secondary point you bring up here that I'd encourage everyone to look at when they get time. Whenever there's a 6-3 ruling that involves Roberts doing his effing job that leaves the 3 liberals to write the dissent, their prose is disturbingly laughable.
Many of you will be shocked (I know I was) at how laughably emotional many of their dissenting pieces are. Often there's very little reference to any kind of precedent, just whining. This isn't always the case, but it is the case a disturbingly large amount of time.
Kagan and Sotomayor are well known for their decisions being emotional and not having any legal substance whatsoever. How they became judges, let alone Supreme Court justices is beyond me
I guess the answer to that question is corruption
Well, Obama did that, so...
As we have seen many times: "Our rights do not stop at your feelings!" I read the opinions a while ago and this one is pure SJW all the way and NOT covered in any way by the Consitution that I can see.
Truth.
Similar to the gun rights case where the court did not throw out gun licensing as unconstitutional, rather, it only threw out requiring a showing of a specific need in order to get a license
Sure, but there are lots of other ""Rules"", that they simply invented out of thin air, and pushed on the States and Public....
I'm hopeful that the Catalytic Converters and Diesel Exhaust Fluid{literally Piss and Distilled Water}, are two of those things that can be 100% tossed out....
It'll drive the climate Change Glowies wildly insane, and within 1 year, we will all benefit from larger Plant Produce and Production.....