OSHA, FCC, CDC, DoE(department of energey),DoE(Department of Education), DHS, TSA, aspects of FBI/CIA, Banking shit. Banking wise I couldn't tell you what since I never understood that sector; FDIC I suppose.
You guys get the idea. Remember many regulations are also backed by law, and sometimes a Regulatory agency is acting within the scope of its legal creation.
Lets do a hypothetical:
"Is X law in violation of the constitution if they regulate Y"
Regardless of X and Y you could argue the federal government is acting outside the constitution.
In practice I think there do need to be regulations above state level. I think some problems are legitimately difficult to control at the state level. But is that outside the founders intention? Perhaps.
Recall explicitly that interstate commerce is a federal authority; there are lots of regulations within that pervue.
That would be fun. I really have no clue what the first agency to be under attack will be. It could be as soon as this week, but I wouldn't expect it to have any effect for a while. There is also the outside chance businesses simply start ignoring certain rules.
That will probably start with energy sector followed by manufacturing. Im wondering how many people start challenging at the state level. Hello California emissions.
OSHA, FCC, CDC, DoE(department of energey),DoE(Department of Education), DHS, TSA, aspects of FBI/CIA, Banking shit. Banking wise I couldn't tell you what since I never understood that sector; FDIC I suppose.
ah: I can do better.
https://www.regulations.gov/agencies
You guys get the idea. Remember many regulations are also backed by law, and sometimes a Regulatory agency is acting within the scope of its legal creation.
thanks!
But are the laws that created them Constitutional? Or do they federalize something Constitutionally protected of the states (like elections)?
Lets do a hypothetical: "Is X law in violation of the constitution if they regulate Y"
Regardless of X and Y you could argue the federal government is acting outside the constitution.
In practice I think there do need to be regulations above state level. I think some problems are legitimately difficult to control at the state level. But is that outside the founders intention? Perhaps.
Recall explicitly that interstate commerce is a federal authority; there are lots of regulations within that pervue.
Depart of Energy Regulations for example: https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-10
FERC...Federal Energy Regulatory Commission...
https://ferc.gov
https://www.ferc.gov/major-orders-regulations doot doot.
Department of Education: https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-34
SEC I believe, didn't the Fifth Circuit rule that?
https://www.sec.gov/about/laws/secrulesregs.htm
Come to think of it.
With this, the SEC is taking a hit. Wonder if crypto bounces back.
That would be fun. I really have no clue what the first agency to be under attack will be. It could be as soon as this week, but I wouldn't expect it to have any effect for a while. There is also the outside chance businesses simply start ignoring certain rules.
That will probably start with energy sector followed by manufacturing. Im wondering how many people start challenging at the state level. Hello California emissions.