Shit pedes...Get in here!!!! The Q Confirmation we have been Lđź‘€king for?
(media.greatawakening.win)
C O N F I R M A T I O N
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (153)
sorted by:
Qs early posts are totally different in vernacular to the main Q we know, hence why they think at some point Ron Watkins got involved but who knows.
Throughout the years, it seems that 1 of the Q team was the main poster, HOWEVER, there were posts that were from Q team different people. It was easy to tell. I'm not really bothered by the different tones in writing styles because this is not new.
Be careful of who you follow but also be careful of the deep state/cabal sending in posters who want us confused and fighting amongst each other - divided we're weak and united we're strong.
Exactly. It's a team. There are clearly 2-3 different "voices" that come through if you know how to determine that.
Yep - if anyone has been following Q for a long time or if they've read the team's posts multiple times, I think it's easier to tell. Many people believe Q is 1 person but that's not so.
From November 2, 2017:
402: "You can count the people who have the full picture on two hands."
403: "Of those (less than 10 people) only three are non-military."
This is the post I've been thinking about. Why is it so unlikely that multiple People could be posting?
If less than 10 people have the full story, then whichever of them is Q would be obvious to the others, And more than likely was set up By all of them together. I don't see it any other way.
I wonder about this^ a lot.
which person actually types the Q drops? or maybe it's a group document, checking each other's work.
Don't know about checking each other's work but they would agree on what is posted, IMO.
They don't check. There are too many posts where it states that spellings don't count because they are on the run while posting and a typo might occur.
Read Q's last drop from the bottom up.. It makes a difference..
Doesn't read exactly the same, but certainly more in line with what I'm used to,
đź‘Ť decernment is good..