Shit pedes...Get in here!!!! The Q Confirmation we have been L👀king for?
(media.greatawakening.win)
C O N F I R M A T I O N
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (153)
sorted by:
Forwarded from ArchiveAnon ️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️*** Okay, this is weird.
Trump reTruthed this account early this morning. If you go to the account you will see that it only has a single post from June 30 with the single word, "Confirmation."
This account has existed since February and yet this is the first and only post on it's feed from two days ago. The account also only has 5 posts in total, 4 of which are in the reply section.
I think if you pair this with the "Sir, we'd like you to confirm" line from Trump's rally, this is a pretty strong indication that Trump is trying to confirm that Q is back.
I'd still like to see something a little more concrete, but this seems like too much of a coincidence not to be deliberate.
It's possible Trump and Q's hands might currently be tied in terms of how strong a proof they can give without violating NATSEC rules. Q is still posting over TOR, after all, so it would seem operational security is still a concern at the moment.
H/T: Lisa Mei Crowley for pointing this one out.
I guess on one hand THEY think all these "weird" proofs are proof enough through the ole "how many coincidences" thing
On the other hand anons still want something stronger.
Speaks alot to what the mood is on both sides. 'They' are panicking to the point where even the possibility that Q is back is cause for them to turn the guns on it. Meanwhile anons are cool headed and optimistic, yet still on guard enough to double and triple check anyone claiming to be Q and even Trump himself.
Some people have said the board is comp'd, and the real Q isn't back, but nothing I've seen convinces me they are right. Wording is slightly different? After a year and a half, that's hardly cause for concern. So is Q back? - I think it's likely. Am I 100% convinced? No, more like 99%. Of all the times for a comp'd Q post to show up, why on Roe v Wade? R v W goes to the heart of the original Q posts.
Either way, you are absolutely right. The left is in a panic. As it should be. Let the bastards squirm.
BTW, I'm not suggesting the board's integrity is 100%. Far from it. That doesn't mean the real Q couldn't show up, and if the account hasn't been reset, restart and verify the comms.
Qs early posts are totally different in vernacular to the main Q we know, hence why they think at some point Ron Watkins got involved but who knows.
If q was comped then the messaging would be inciting violence to get the narrative they need that we are “terrorists” or whatever.
From the news on The Gateway Pundit, I see the commies are surely ramping up their rhetoric and saying more nasty things, so something has them scared or they completely lost their minds (although the mind loss could be very normal).
well they were the ones who told us to be careful who we follow!!
For what its worth, reading and pondering what's read =/= being a follower.
Q asks questions and seeks to evoke curiousity. Contrast that with pundit/influencers like POSobiec who tell people what to think and how to feel.
Noticing the use of plural pronouns instead of singular pronouns. Q actually said "beware who YOU follow" ie who you allow to think for you. Q also provided training around how to spot malevolent psyops and manipulatives trying to get followers.
"Anons still want".
Please speak for yourself, anon.
Each anon is a unique individual. For some anons this adventure began on October 28, 2017. Others joined later. Each was convinced at different points in the journey and for different reasons. Which proofs were compelling and which were not varied as were the number needed because anons are unique. Strong and "stronger" are subjective terms.
Reviewing some of the many videos highlighting Q proofs between 2017 and 2020, or going to 8kun.top//qresearch and reading their collection of proofs may help refresh your memory, ground current expectations in reality and provide protection from psyops that prey on every weakness.
Finally, a reminder about " I wants". What's going on is much bigger than just individual anons and what individual anons want as Humphrey Bogarts character, Rick, pointed out so passionately in "Casablanca"s iconic final scene.
As Trump tried to teach people with his first rally ending song, "you CANT always get what you want, but if you try, sometimes you get what you need". As people mature they begin to understand how true this is and to respond with " thank God".
Perhaps turn frets into thanks and prayers then return to using each present to do what you can do to help. Many use the "Serenity Prayer", easily found on line, when fret feels start distracting them from reals.
I just want more popcorn.
Well said Cozette! 👏
cool story brol
😘
Agree. I was thinking it was a no, but this is too much of a coincidence not to be a confirm.
Lol if he thinks TOR hides someone from the NSA
Wha??? But I have a VPN!
Tweens know just enough to imagine they "know-it-all". Hence the snark and lols.
There are methods to tunnel through proxies that are located away from Five-eyes.
It does, if used properly anyhow.
negative ghostrider. You can use a burner laptop at mcdonalds and still get caught
Yup, if you're doing it wrong.
I'm considered an "expert" in the field of high assurance/robustness computing/networking systems. I'm happy to address what threats you think may exists, but right now you're just spreading FUD.
The only part about this that bothers me is the “without violating NATSEC rules”.
We are at war with pure evil. Fuk the “rules”. Only rule should be “win at all costs”.
No need to violate NatSec rules to communicate...plus GEOTUS must remain squeaky clean. That has allowed him to beat every attempt to snag him, including the Trump investigation du jour — the J6 Clown Court.
Absolutely
op thanks for telling the frens in the back. kek
😜
Its impossible to defeat evil by becoming evil. That's an ancient test; a temptation predicated on a lie.
Cheating actually makes one more vulnerable, as Qs pointed out, is unnecessary and ultimately means the "cheater" is helping evil by becoming evil.
+1
Yeah, but God also had Archangels when hands needed to get dirty.