OP here. Really? Mebbe it is; Mebbe it isn’t. Why would GEOTUS choose this rather “deplorable looking and worded” comment to re-Truth an opinion over what the sham J6 committee is trying to accomplish — Look here! Don’t look there, from an account, as Archive Anon stated, was opened 2/21/2022 with first Truth posted yesterday with one word - confirmation. https://ibb.co/8NmGG1Z

Other than that, his only other “Truths” were 4 rather benign comments to other Truths within the last day. This dude has 1.5k followers which likely came in the last 24 hours; how could you have that many followers prior to posting anything?

The original comment that @seqfranco was responding to was regarding Trump’s interview with Rob Finnerty on June 30, 2022:

https://rumble.com/v1ak9z5-former-president-donald-trump-interview-with-rob-finnerty-wake-up-america.html

So if we know one thing about GEOTUS’s comms, we know that EVERY one of them has a purpose. So why choose a “deplorable-looking” account whose has only one original post (Confirmation) And that in the last 24 hours? Certainly there are a plethora of posts or truths that could have been referenced that made these points more eloquently. That at a time When the Q Community is struggling to confirm whether the communication channel has been opened again?

One thing Q has constantly reminded us is that there are no coincidences. Pretty low odds that this is a random coincidence while coinciding with a one-Truther account (Confirmation) and coinciding with Q’s return(?) and coinciding with the community’s struggle to CONFIRM whether Q is back or not. In my humble opinion, Vanishingly low odds.