Shit pedes...Get in here!!!! The Q Confirmation we have been Lđź‘€king for?
(media.greatawakening.win)
C O N F I R M A T I O N
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (153)
sorted by:
OP here. Really? Mebbe it is; Mebbe it isn’t. Why would GEOTUS choose this rather “deplorable looking and worded” comment to re-Truth an opinion over what the sham J6 committee is trying to accomplish — Look here! Don’t look there, from an account, as Archive Anon stated, was opened 2/21/2022 with first Truth posted yesterday with one word - confirmation. https://ibb.co/8NmGG1Z
Other than that, his only other “Truths” were 4 rather benign comments to other Truths within the last day. This dude has 1.5k followers which likely came in the last 24 hours; how could you have that many followers prior to posting anything?
The original comment that @seqfranco was responding to was regarding Trump’s interview with Rob Finnerty on June 30, 2022:
https://rumble.com/v1ak9z5-former-president-donald-trump-interview-with-rob-finnerty-wake-up-america.html
So if we know one thing about GEOTUS’s comms, we know that EVERY one of them has a purpose. So why choose a “deplorable-looking” account whose has only one original post (Confirmation) And that in the last 24 hours? Certainly there are a plethora of posts or truths that could have been referenced that made these points more eloquently. That at a time When the Q Community is struggling to confirm whether the communication channel has been opened again?
One thing Q has constantly reminded us is that there are no coincidences. Pretty low odds that this is a random coincidence while coinciding with a one-Truther account (Confirmation) and coinciding with Q’s return(?) and coinciding with the community’s struggle to CONFIRM whether Q is back or not. In my humble opinion, Vanishingly low odds.
Thx, op. "Confirmation" is Qurious for a new acct, not to mention not any followers prior to a single post?
Thank you're on to sumpin
[Edited for context, stoopid spellchk]
I was trying to say, prob had no followers before Trump re-truthed him, and those followers likely were acquired in the last 24 hours.
Yes, it only shows 137 in the screenshot above. Probably did have very few followers before his retruth.
Yeah I understood what you said, makes sense. Fishy at best?
If I had too, I'd bet it's related to comms
So what do you want to do now? What does this change?
Why does it have to change anything? Just seems like an observation
Well it outed you as a concern shill. So there's that.