It's only when you find out what was on the office floors that were both hit at the towers, what agencies were operating in building 7, at what was housed in the exact point the missile, sorry Airplane, that hit the Pentagon do you start to unravel the why's.
People that tell me that the aviation fuel weakened the steel beams (beside it being built as a column within a column structure) and travelled down the elevator shafts understand nothing. Firstly none of the aircraft would have full fuel, airlines just don't fly around the world with full fuel tanks! There's enough for the planned flight duration, with extra for their planned divert and a minimum amount needed on board on landing. These aircraft were flying for over an hour, and wouldn't have left with full tanks.
Even if some of the fuel had escaped and whooshed around the indie of the building, aviation kerosene isn't particularly flammable unless compressed then ignited. The bizarre theory that it could burn long enough and hot enough to melt steel is a joke. Anyone who say's so probable shouldn't light a woodstove or a heating oil boiler for any length of time!
But it's the aviation aspect which is most telling. The official report has the aircraft travelling at speeds so far outside the envelope (VMO or Velocity Max Operating) that the airframe would have ripped itself apart before hitting the towers. To think a 757 could put out enough thrust at sea level to power the aircraft to such speed is also simply impossible, let alone a rookie pilot actually hand flying the radar plots they put out in the official reports.
And so much more. In my opinion the aircraft were took over remotely, and yes the technology was there decades before 2001 to do so. Once remotely flown, there could be nothing the aircrew could do to over-ride it, even pulling breakers or engine restarts would not have stopped it.
The official report has the aircraft travelling at speeds so far outside the envelope (VMO or Velocity Max Operating) that the airframe would have ripped itself apart before hitting the towers.
Look fren, the descending 360' turn made with the aircraft that allegedly hit the Pentagon, coming in at ground level is pretty much impossible even for pilots on heavy's with 1000's of hours, let alone someone who couldn't get clearance for solo in a Cessna! The input on the controls would have been so minimal you wouldn't be able to tell, just think it and you'd probably over control it!
"So they made that portion up for what purpose?"
Because whoever wrote it, they weren't airline pilots, and needed the radar plot to match the story, because the airframes were being flown remotely!
I could go on to the black boxes, the edited frames of the Pentagon car park barrier video we have, the cell phones apparently working on the aircraft at 32,000' the ground speeds and more.
Because wowever wrote it they weren't airline pilots, and needed the radar plot to match the story, because the airframes were being flown remotely!
Thank you fren.
I could go on to the black boxes, the edited frames of the Pentagon car park barrier video we have, the cell phones apparently working on the aircraft at 32,000' the ground speeds and more.
No need, I already know it was a FF. Just asking why they made up that one portion of the speeds. I wonder how many legit pilots read that and said wtf?
I can't for remember off the top of my head the airspeeds quoted, but I recall them being way outside Velocity Max Operating and off the chart for any safety factor, something in the region of 140 Kts IAS over VMO. The airframe would have ripped itself apart, with wing flutter, resonance and other nasty's!
It's only when you find out what was on the office floors that were both hit at the towers, what agencies were operating in building 7, at what was housed in the exact point the missile, sorry Airplane, that hit the Pentagon do you start to unravel the why's.
People that tell me that the aviation fuel weakened the steel beams (beside it being built as a column within a column structure) and travelled down the elevator shafts understand nothing. Firstly none of the aircraft would have full fuel, airlines just don't fly around the world with full fuel tanks! There's enough for the planned flight duration, with extra for their planned divert and a minimum amount needed on board on landing. These aircraft were flying for over an hour, and wouldn't have left with full tanks.
Even if some of the fuel had escaped and whooshed around the indie of the building, aviation kerosene isn't particularly flammable unless compressed then ignited. The bizarre theory that it could burn long enough and hot enough to melt steel is a joke. Anyone who say's so probable shouldn't light a woodstove or a heating oil boiler for any length of time!
But it's the aviation aspect which is most telling. The official report has the aircraft travelling at speeds so far outside the envelope (VMO or Velocity Max Operating) that the airframe would have ripped itself apart before hitting the towers. To think a 757 could put out enough thrust at sea level to power the aircraft to such speed is also simply impossible, let alone a rookie pilot actually hand flying the radar plots they put out in the official reports.
And so much more. In my opinion the aircraft were took over remotely, and yes the technology was there decades before 2001 to do so. Once remotely flown, there could be nothing the aircrew could do to over-ride it, even pulling breakers or engine restarts would not have stopped it.
There's been a lot of mental gymnastics to try justify the MSM narrative. I've seen them all, they all fail.
So they made that portion up for what purpose?
Look fren, the descending 360' turn made with the aircraft that allegedly hit the Pentagon, coming in at ground level is pretty much impossible even for pilots on heavy's with 1000's of hours, let alone someone who couldn't get clearance for solo in a Cessna! The input on the controls would have been so minimal you wouldn't be able to tell, just think it and you'd probably over control it!
"So they made that portion up for what purpose?"
Because whoever wrote it, they weren't airline pilots, and needed the radar plot to match the story, because the airframes were being flown remotely!
I could go on to the black boxes, the edited frames of the Pentagon car park barrier video we have, the cell phones apparently working on the aircraft at 32,000' the ground speeds and more.
Thank you fren.
No need, I already know it was a FF. Just asking why they made up that one portion of the speeds. I wonder how many legit pilots read that and said wtf?
Do you remember what the speeds were?
Lol I must fix that typo! "Wowever"
I can't for remember off the top of my head the airspeeds quoted, but I recall them being way outside Velocity Max Operating and off the chart for any safety factor, something in the region of 140 Kts IAS over VMO. The airframe would have ripped itself apart, with wing flutter, resonance and other nasty's!