Fully vaccinated Carlos Santana (74 years old) collapses on stage during performance in Clarkston, Michigan
(media.greatawakening.win)
Video in mod comment
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (75)
sorted by:
You are absolutely correct. Dietary cholesterol was a boogey man created by the Sugar Association and Big Pharma. Fasting insulin levels due to simple carb consumption, especially all of the modern processed forms of sugars, are one of the best indicators of inflammatory processes in the body - plus other metabolic parameters that are rarely tested for outside of alternative medicine like homocysteine, fibrinogen, C-reactive protein, and lipid particle size. What is being tested for on a normal blood lipid panel is like a blind man trying to access what an elephant looks like just by holding on to its tail. Less than 20 percent of cholesterol can be linked to dietary sources. The lion's share is made in the liver - some in response to inflammation. The introduction of HFCS really drove the process since the fructose in metabolized in the liver using the same pathways as alcohol. This is why there has been a steady increase in non alcoholic fatty liver disease. It also goes hand in hand with the epidemic of DM2.
Statin drugs were developed for those people you mentioned that genetically have cholesterol levels that are in the stratosphere. But that doesn't make money so they lied once again to create a market - Hegelian Dialect. Magically what is considered "normal" levels have been moving down for years. The same is true with other parameters - they are all based on averages that can change over time. So what should a healthy level be? Do we even know anymore.
The latest push of the Rockefeller's Reset the Table initiative, also linked to the WHO and the UN, is moving everyone towards an entirely plant based diet - and zee bugs. I recently had to earn some CEUs for state licensing and took a nutrition class. I could not believe the changes that have taken place within the nutrition field in just a few years. Put this all together and it is obvious where certain forces are trying to take us. There is a reason why they are going after particular food sources - and it is not due to cow farts. I have known for a long time that most of the garbage coming out of the so called professional journals that try to pass for legitimate peer reviewed science is bought and paid for by those with an interest in predetermined results. How do I know? I worked in research for over 10 years and saw exactly how the game was played. The money drives the so called science.
The patients that I saw in my practice that were Vegans eventually had it crash and burn in some manner. Mostly immune system and musculoskeletal problems. The Vegans that ran, especially marathon and triathletes, to me seemed to be prone to lower extremity fractures that were shattering in nature - all requiring surgery and ending their athletic careers. After several years it seemed to be a pattern. They also appeared to be more prone to spinal fractures as well. The whole thing appeared to start hitting the wall in the mid to late forties if they had been a Vegan since in their twenties. Some of the women had the skeletal structure of an eighty year old. They had no muscle mass, could not retain body heat, and were sick all the time. I know this is purely anecdotal from my end, but this is what I saw walking into my office. The protein and antioxidant needs of the body were not being met enough to compensate for the activity level. Despite my warnings, they would politely tell me I was full of crap and go on about their business. At some point they came back in with stress fractures and some with severe breaks - and that is on top of the rest of the chronic illness they developed. Like the vaxxine faithful, even then they could not admit it was in fact their so called healthy lifestyle that was actually slowly killing them. Vegetarianism is a cult and not a diet.
Makes a ton of sense. HFCS is REALLY bad stuff. Government subsidized, of course ...
The video I linked explores this issue. There is a "cholesterol board" that determines at what levels statins should be prescribed. That number has been going lower and lower over the years, thereby increasing the number of people taking statins.
Turns out, the individuals on that board have financial conflicts of interest. They make more money when these drugs are prescribed. They get paid directly from the drug companies, and that does not even count the possibility that they might also buy up some key stocks just before their next "guideline" announcement.
Editors of Lancet and JAMA have both said that over 50% of research published in their journals are not valid science.
Although this is an extreme example, it is interesting at the rapid rate of declining health. This guy tried to do an experiment where he would only eat broccoli for one week. The results were both comical and frightening. It's not so shocking at the declining health, but the RATE of declining health is mindboggling:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gbTqsiysiOs
The Lancet and JAMA claiming only 50% - they are being far too generous.
KEK
Nothing like a little help from your friends. LOL! Thanks.
I think a couple of things were going on here. All that fiber threw his digestive tract into shock and quickly altered his gut flora - a hot toxic mess. In addition, huge amounts of cruciferous vegetables can block thyroid function - that could explain some of the fatigue both physical and mental. No protein intake for an otherwise healthy young guy - not good. Yes, the decline was pretty rapid. If he had not decided to do the exercising, things may have been different. Was there any way of knowing whether the activity level was normal for him or just done for the challenge? That would have drastically altered the outcome if it was not part of his normal daily routine. Interesting. Supersize Me only in reverse - and much faster.