“Beware of the false prophets, who come to you in sheep’s clothing, but inwardly are ravenous wolves. You will know them by their fruits. Grapes are not gathered from thorn bushes nor figs from thistles, are they? So every good tree bears good fruit, but the bad tree bears bad fruit. A good tree cannot produce bad fruit, nor can a bad tree produce good fruit. Every tree that does not bear good fruit is cut down and thrown into the fire. So then, you will know them by their fruits. “Not everyone who says to Me, ‘Lord, Lord,’ will enter the kingdom of heaven, but he who does the will of My Father who is in heaven will enter. Many will say to Me on that day, ‘Lord, Lord, did we not prophesy in Your name, and in Your name cast out demons, and in Your name perform many miracles?’ And then I will declare to them, ‘I never knew you; depart from Me, you who practice lawlessness.’”
Matthew 7:15-23
Paul was met by Christ on the road to Damascus, and had his major conversion at that time, his sight was permanently diminished b/c his eyes couldn't handle even the tiniest bit of glory that was shone to him. It's apparent your google bible isn't working out too well.
Mathias is who Christ named to replace Judas. Paul's conversion story has the consistency of Joseph Smith.
It's not my place to determine if Paul's intentions were nefarious, but at the end of the day, he was just a man, fallible and capable of being wrong. He should not be considered the same way Mathew, Mark, Luke and John are in regards to precedent. Jesus comes first. The rest is idea exchange, not law.
You should try confessing with they mouth the Lord Jesus and believing in your heart God raised him from the dead. Then... you might understand what you read. This isn't complicated Nd even God says even a fool needed not erreth therein. Paul received the revelation that is directly addressed to the born again believers since Pentecost. He was pretty important.
“Beware of the false prophets, who come to you in sheep’s clothing, but inwardly are ravenous wolves. You will know them by their fruits. Grapes are not gathered from thorn bushes nor figs from thistles, are they? So every good tree bears good fruit, but the bad tree bears bad fruit. A good tree cannot produce bad fruit, nor can a bad tree produce good fruit. Every tree that does not bear good fruit is cut down and thrown into the fire. So then, you will know them by their fruits. “Not everyone who says to Me, ‘Lord, Lord,’ will enter the kingdom of heaven, but he who does the will of My Father who is in heaven will enter. Many will say to Me on that day, ‘Lord, Lord, did we not prophesy in Your name, and in Your name cast out demons, and in Your name perform many miracles?’ And then I will declare to them, ‘I never knew you; depart from Me, you who practice lawlessness.’” Matthew 7:15-23
So we should suspect you?
Soool... Beware of Paul?
Paul was met by Christ on the road to Damascus, and had his major conversion at that time, his sight was permanently diminished b/c his eyes couldn't handle even the tiniest bit of glory that was shone to him. It's apparent your google bible isn't working out too well.
Mathias is who Christ named to replace Judas. Paul's conversion story has the consistency of Joseph Smith.
It's not my place to determine if Paul's intentions were nefarious, but at the end of the day, he was just a man, fallible and capable of being wrong. He should not be considered the same way Mathew, Mark, Luke and John are in regards to precedent. Jesus comes first. The rest is idea exchange, not law.
You should try confessing with they mouth the Lord Jesus and believing in your heart God raised him from the dead. Then... you might understand what you read. This isn't complicated Nd even God says even a fool needed not erreth therein. Paul received the revelation that is directly addressed to the born again believers since Pentecost. He was pretty important.
Paul wasn't a replacement.