This 911 Pentagon footage was only aired once
(files.catbox.moe)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (30)
sorted by:
There's that 3-4 frame clip from a security camera that showed something a lot smaller going into the building.
Also it's proven that the plane could not of crashed into the side as there is an air effect caused by the wings pushing the air down. The plane speed causes so much lift pushing down it's impossible to get a large plane so close to the ground.
The plane would of bounced up a d it would of tore the turf apart as it's a lot of force. Have a look at the photos the grass is undisturbed.
One of my close friends is a retired B52 combat pilot. We talked about this the other day. He said that with basic flight training, it would be possible for even a camel jockey to fly a commercial plane into a low target like the Pentagon. He also maintains 100% that United 93 was shot down by a USAF fighter.
That said, you are correct about the 3-4 frame clip from the CCTV. It shows a small object, when compared to a commercial airliner, about the size of a Tomahawk missile hitting the side of the Pentagon.
Interestingly, a bystander, whom I know, was in the parking lot when the plane/missile hit and was a very early voice pushing the plane narrative on CNN at the time. That same turd was recently in Ukraine pulling the same fake "subject matter expert" shit on TV. His name is Malcolm Nance - traitor, 9/11 coverupper, and Brennan buttboy.
Incorrect. Otherwise, large planes would never be able to land - and they do every day.
And yes, I'm a pilot (USAF).
There is an effect called ground effect - it is real. However, it would NOT prevent a large plane or any other sized plane, from flying close to the ground.
"Lift" does not push up, it pulls up.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zze32ZEjt30
https://vault.fbi.gov/9-11-attacks-investigation-and-related-materials/9-11-attacks-and-investigation-images