Q Post 1543 -- “Undiscovered stars learned” 👀👀👀
(media.greatawakening.win)
Comments (22)
sorted by:
Anyone else find it curious that first we had Hubbell, then Webb. Webb Hubble. 🧐
Unknown future events will make sense of these drops. They are not supposed to make sense now.
They're vague because most events haven't happened yet. The ones that have come to pass seemed vague at the time of the drop and did not when it happened. No Name's death for example.
https://nypost.com/2022/07/12/nasas-james-webb-space-telescope-offers-look-into-distant-galaxies/
Every single object that NASA has just released images for except for the deep sky field can be seen with a backyard telescope just not as detailed. The difference in resolution between the telescope I had as a kid and my 16" with CCD imaging is in a direct line with the capabilities of the Hubble and now the James Webb.
Can a regular telescope see billions of light years away?
Apart from the galaxies in the deep sky field, all of the other objects in the recent series of James Webb images are located within the Milky Way Galaxy and easily seen with a backyard telescope. In fact the Carina Nebula is visible with the naked eye. If you don't believe me do a Google image search for Stephen's Quintet and you can find dozens of amateur images although obviously as not as detailed as the James Webb was able to resolve. And the answer to your question is yes. You can see quasar 3C273 with the naked eye which is 2 billion light-years away.
yep, just like those remnants of apollo missions that everyone SAYS can be seen with a backyard telescope.....lol
No one except an idiot would claim that you can see the remnants of the Apollo missions with a backyard or even the most powerful Earth based telescope.
The Moon is 380,000km from the Earth (about 10 times the length of the Equator). The apparent diameter that the Moon looks from the Earth is about the same as the diameter of Australia would appear if you were looking at it from the Moon, while the Earth would appear four times larger than the Moon appears from Earth.
To claim that you could see the remnants of the Apollo missions such as the descent landers would be like saying if you were on the Moon looking at Earth with a backyard telescope you could see objects the size of small cars in Australia.
As I said, you'd have to be extremely stupid to claim that you can see Apollo mission remnants from the Earth. However, remnants of the Apollo missions have been photographed numerous times over the last fifty years by orbiting lunar probes from multiple nations including the Russians and Chinese who would love to disprove the Moon landing theories espoused by crackpots but nevertheless have provided photographic evidence that they took place.
Other undiscovered stars, like Ms Hutchinson? 🤔🤔
Dark to light, frens. 👀🍿
The moon is so bright you can see green grass and trees at night.
Likely quite a few holes in my observation, but maybe something along the lines of this:
D for delta (Delta Force? Maybe Q has D referenced somewhere else, maybe DECLAS)
Shinzo Abe's (possibly faked) death (land of the rising sun) brings heat to the baddies
Super moon that everyone knows about, but also the crescent moon has semblance to the middle east (beginning Eid Al Hada this month). Full moons are also beneficial in military operations during the night. Its also when the vampires (cabalists) come out, signifying when they will be the strongest
James Webb telescope imaging (which i think its truly CGI tbh, but i am open to being wrong). I think JWT was meant to be comms instead of scientific discovery (undiscovered stars are the links in the BH/DS network we don't know about)
Abe was not a good guy...according to ben fulford. He was a moonie...if you think that means a religion it doesn't....he did what USA deep state wanted him to do.
I didn't say he was good or bad. If you kill a "bad" guy, with your logic, that would scare his bad guy friends, right? Or if he faked it and they didn't know that was going to happen, wouldn't that still scare them? Slow down and stop assuming. You're already considering that I am dumb before you even allow me to respond
No I didn't assume any such thing.....agree with lots you said
I apologize then. The tone comes off a different way when presented
I'm with you on that...
I mean i know its quite usual to get clowned with the conspiracy theorist hate tag when you question things about "space", but if NASA (the organization itself, not the astronomers and other intellectuals that are genuinely interested in space) isn't a money funneling operation to appease oligarchs running engineering and tech enterprises rather than doing actual space exploration, then i'll apologize and admit i am a jerk. But i haven't seen much that NASA has done for the US other than "exploration". At least for all the money they get. Very reason why Trump had Space Force started i believe, to find a way to protect the digital and physical space within the US. I know NASA isn't meant to be for defense purposes, but in a grey moment it should have the duty to.
If things weren't the way they are,i would highly approve of researching space age tech for the right reasons. Except when you compare dollar to dollar and the amount of resources that have been used, there hasn't been an efficient transaction occurring. Tesla was right to be concerned about his research.
If only Q had the poetry that Nostradamus had in his predictions and was just a little bit clearer. Just look at the elegance in this quatrain when Nostradamus clearly predicted the rigged election:
"The false message about the rigged election "to run through the city stopping the broken pact; "voices bought, chapel stained with blood, "the empire contracted to another one."
Or in this quatrain when Nostradamus foresaw the rise of Q and us Anons and our ultimate fate in our battle against ancient satanic evil:
"Several will be confused in their waiting, "Pardon will not be given the inhabitants: "Those who thought well of persisting in the waiting, "But not much spare time will be given them."