Read the King James Bible only. The New-age Bible translations have perverted God's Holy Bible by omitting verses, deleting key words and phrases in order to diminish God's power, confuse Christians and redefine what sin is. See the link document for details. God bless you.
(files.catbox.moe)
🗣️ DISCUSSION 💬
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (262)
sorted by:
this, KJV has been revised many times. OP is flat out wrong. we have discovered a ton more since the KJV was initially written.
KJV-only-ism has only been around for a century... it is a championing of ignorance against academia. That said, it's a fine translation. Using it when clearer translations are available is setting a greater distance between a reader and hearing the voice of God in the text though. I'm surprised this hasn't come up on here before now...
The problem is the modern Bibles are not based on Hebrew Masoretic OT and Textus Receptus Koine Greek New Testament.
They're based on the "oldest" manuscripts, which were edited by the Alexandrian Gnostic scholars.
Codex Alexandrinus ended up in the hands of Charles I of England, who just happened to be a Roman Catholic. Codex Vaticanus was stored away in the Vatican for centuries. Codex Sinaiticus was "discovered" by Tischendorf, a supposed Protestant, who just happened to have an audience in Rome before taking a trip to a Roman Catholic convent on Mt. Sinai in Egypt, where he found the manuscript in a wastepaper basket where it had sat for centuries.
When your Old Testament translation is based on the Septuagint, a Greek translation and Vatican/Alexandrian manuscripts, instead of the original Hebrew, that's a problem.
If your Bible has a footnote for Acts 8:37, or if Acts 8:37 is missing completely, it's a sure sign it's corrupted.
See my top-level post about Chris Pinto's documentaries exposing the fraud used to create the newer versions.
Reposting here as my top-level post seems to be shadow banned.
Chris Pinto from Adullam Films has done a brilliant 3 part (so far) documentary where he gives compelling evidence to show that after the KJV was published, the Vatican launched the counter-reformation and using the Jesuits, forged the Codex Sinaiticus and Codex Vaticanus as a way to undermine the authority of the bible, since the KJV is translated from the Textus Receptus and the two former manuscripts are claimed to be older and therefore more authoritive, and the motto from the reformation was "Sola Scriptura", undermining the authority of the Pope.
A Lamp in the Dark: The Untold History of the Bible
Tares Among the Wheat
Bridge to Babylon
Videos can be purchased at:
https://www.adullamfilms.com/
Revisions to be more accurate to the original meaning, not less
Reposting here as my top-level post seems to be shadow banned.
Chris Pinto from Adullam Films has done a brilliant 3 part (so far) documentary where he gives compelling evidence to show that after the KJV was published, the Vatican launched the counter-reformation and using the Jesuits, forged the Codex Sinaiticus and Codex Vaticanus as a way to undermine the authority of the bible, since the KJV is translated from the Textus Receptus and the two former manuscripts are claimed to be older and therefore more authoritive, and the motto from the reformation was "Sola Scriptura", undermining the authority of the Pope.
A Lamp in the Dark: The Untold History of the Bible
Tares Among the Wheat
Bridge to Babylon
Videos can be purchased at:
https://www.adullamfilms.com/
kjv was a version of Douay Rheimes translation
We haven’t “discovered” anythinh. The bible hasn’t changed. Except for unfaithful versions like KJV which just changed entire passages for the sake of a king who disagreed
Not true at all. The modern Bibles are closer to the Roman Catholic Douay Rheimes, because they're based on the same edited Alexandrian Greek source texts such as Codex Vaticanus.
The King James NT is based on the Textus Receptus, which was preserved when Orthodox believers fled both the wrath of the Holy Roman Empire and the Muslim invaders.
Yes these "discoveries", Codex Sinaiticus and Codex Vaticanus look like they are actually frauds. See my top-level post.