Are you claiming they do? I don’t need to make any claim that something never proven to exist does not exist. Would I bother to claim that elves don’t exist? At this point it’s completely obvious to anyone not afraid to consider it, and frankly it’s embarrassing when people believe they exist.
You're doing the standard lefty "I make a claim and call anyone who doesn't agree names, then demand evidence I'm wrong while I am under no such burden for proving my own claims"
THAT is embarassing. The fact that there is a PROCESS for isolating viruses is a pretty big indicator they've succeedeed.
Biochemist here. There is a process that mixes cells with diseased animal cells and toxins, incubates and kills everything, sounds out and picks up random genetic material, feeds the sequences into a computer, then fills in the remainder based on human assumptions and produces a virtual construct.
Proven: The same results occur whether there was a sick human cell or a healthy human cell.
Not proven: no virus has ever been directly observed by any level of microscope.
Bacteria, gems, parasites, all isolated, all observed.
Proof of what I’m saying? That’s easy. Https://learninggnm.com Giving you proof is not a challenge at all. The challenge is in you not being too afraid to read it all. Even more so, you lasting even longer than 5 minutes. Let’s see how you go. In the same way that a lefty can’t watch a trump speech, you too will find the same challenge with this. Take all your courage.
I don’t have a claim. You idiotically claim without proof that viruses exist. I say prove it, you refuse because reasons and that’s all there is to it. Oh and also you’re all smug about it because you’ve got a whole world of idiots on your side.
It’s not proof you are looking for. It’s your personal inability to comprehend things in general. There’s no available help in society for cases like yours. You will be given up.
You stupidly parrot what you've been told without ever considering anything behind it. There is no scientific proof that a virus exists in nature.
I claim there is no phoenix in nature. It doesn't matter how many virtual computer phoenix have been rendered, none have been isolated in nature. If a lab creates an mRNA injections with pieces of "phoenix" replication instructions to alter your DNA, still doesn't make a phoenix real. If swabs push toxins into your nose or junk is sprayed into the atmosphere or toxins are in processed foods product and people get ill with "phoenix measles" still doesn't prove there's a phoenix in nature.
Koch's postulates are the conditions through which one would prove that a microorganism causes disease.
1 - The microorganism must be found in diseased but not healthy people.
2 - Must be cultured from the diseased individual
3 - Inoculation of a healthy individual should give the person the illness
4 - The microorganism must be re-isolated from the inoculated individual
That process would prove that the microorganism (virus) is the cause of the disease.
Worth noting, that even Propionibacterium acnes (P. acnes) (commonly acne) has not met these conditions.
Tell us you don't understand how the immune system works, without telling us you don't understand how the immune system works.
Look at the progression of what we call the common cold....
Person with runny nose, sore throat, small elevated temperature and cough is in contact with individual who doesn't have these symptoms.
That second individual FIRST develops a "tickle" in their nose, followed by a sore throat. They don't go automatically to a cough and light fever.
What does common sense tell you?
That nothing is making them sick?
No, it indicates that whatever is infecting them first resides in the part of the body which we use to take in outside oxygen....our nose and mouth. From there it starts to multiply, since our immune system can't fight infections outside the blood stream.
As we ingest the saliva from our mouth, during the day, it enters our body and the culture in our throat eventually makes it to our lungs.
I literally explained to you the process through which one would prove a causal relationship between a microorganism and the disease it causes.
Those postulates have NEVER been demonstrated for ANY virus at any time, over 100+ years, even with acne, something that was 'known' as the cause of pimples for a long time.
Common sense on this issue is carried over from what was 'common sense' in the later 1800s.
No, not 'nothing' making people sick as much as bacteria and viruses are not what we are told. The terrain theory places bacteria as a way to 'eat' dead cells so that toxicity doesn't' spread through the body. It also puts viruses as cells who were damaged and self-destruct which gives the appearance under a microscope of the virus 'blowing out' a contaminated cell.
This debate was going on in the time of Louis Pasteur, who argued that germs were infecting people and causing illness whereas the competing terrain theory was suggesting that bacteria and viruses cannot exist in a healthy environment and are actually part of the process of bringing the body back to a baseline.
Bro you don't need to tell us all that stuff. We KNOW the mainstream science, ok? We used to think the exact same thing as you. Telling us what we used to think, to dissuade us from the new knowledge that we've graduated to, is not going to "convince" us to come back down to kindergarten. We noticed a million contradictions in the mainstream theory that you have not yet noticed. But... maybe you soon will.
Are you claiming viruses don't exist?
Are you claiming they do? I don’t need to make any claim that something never proven to exist does not exist. Would I bother to claim that elves don’t exist? At this point it’s completely obvious to anyone not afraid to consider it, and frankly it’s embarrassing when people believe they exist.
You're doing the standard lefty "I make a claim and call anyone who doesn't agree names, then demand evidence I'm wrong while I am under no such burden for proving my own claims"
THAT is embarassing. The fact that there is a PROCESS for isolating viruses is a pretty big indicator they've succeedeed.
Biochemist here. There is a process that mixes cells with diseased animal cells and toxins, incubates and kills everything, sounds out and picks up random genetic material, feeds the sequences into a computer, then fills in the remainder based on human assumptions and produces a virtual construct.
Proven: The same results occur whether there was a sick human cell or a healthy human cell.
Not proven: no virus has ever been directly observed by any level of microscope.
Bacteria, gems, parasites, all isolated, all observed.
Proof of what I’m saying? That’s easy. Https://learninggnm.com Giving you proof is not a challenge at all. The challenge is in you not being too afraid to read it all. Even more so, you lasting even longer than 5 minutes. Let’s see how you go. In the same way that a lefty can’t watch a trump speech, you too will find the same challenge with this. Take all your courage.
I'm just trying to make certain I understand what your idiotic claim is.
I don’t have a claim. You idiotically claim without proof that viruses exist. I say prove it, you refuse because reasons and that’s all there is to it. Oh and also you’re all smug about it because you’ve got a whole world of idiots on your side.
It’s not proof you are looking for. It’s your personal inability to comprehend things in general. There’s no available help in society for cases like yours. You will be given up.
There is no proof I could provide which would change what you believe.
You are like the flat-earther, who disingenuously tries to argue logically the Earth is flat, but uses anything but logic.
However, that's not really what you're interested in, is it?
No, you don't really believe any of what you are saying because your real goal is to promote ridiculous bullshit to make this site look bad.
Then, there appears an article in leftist media claiming Q followers don't believe in science and you link to your post as proof.
Fuck off, shill faggot.
You stupidly parrot what you've been told without ever considering anything behind it. There is no scientific proof that a virus exists in nature.
I claim there is no phoenix in nature. It doesn't matter how many virtual computer phoenix have been rendered, none have been isolated in nature. If a lab creates an mRNA injections with pieces of "phoenix" replication instructions to alter your DNA, still doesn't make a phoenix real. If swabs push toxins into your nose or junk is sprayed into the atmosphere or toxins are in processed foods product and people get ill with "phoenix measles" still doesn't prove there's a phoenix in nature.
Okay?
How many different fucking accounts are you using, shill?
I’m starting to believe more and more every day that the only virus’ people contract are through injection, not the farce of “modern virology.”
So you do believe viruses exist?
Let’s easily test your knowledge. Is virus the only that can affect the body?
No.
Go eat a piece of rancid meat and let us know how you feel.
Not in the context of modern virology.
Koch's postulates are the conditions through which one would prove that a microorganism causes disease.
1 - The microorganism must be found in diseased but not healthy people. 2 - Must be cultured from the diseased individual 3 - Inoculation of a healthy individual should give the person the illness 4 - The microorganism must be re-isolated from the inoculated individual
That process would prove that the microorganism (virus) is the cause of the disease.
Worth noting, that even Propionibacterium acnes (P. acnes) (commonly acne) has not met these conditions.
Tell us you don't understand how the immune system works, without telling us you don't understand how the immune system works.
Look at the progression of what we call the common cold....
Person with runny nose, sore throat, small elevated temperature and cough is in contact with individual who doesn't have these symptoms.
That second individual FIRST develops a "tickle" in their nose, followed by a sore throat. They don't go automatically to a cough and light fever.
What does common sense tell you?
That nothing is making them sick?
No, it indicates that whatever is infecting them first resides in the part of the body which we use to take in outside oxygen....our nose and mouth. From there it starts to multiply, since our immune system can't fight infections outside the blood stream.
As we ingest the saliva from our mouth, during the day, it enters our body and the culture in our throat eventually makes it to our lungs.
I literally explained to you the process through which one would prove a causal relationship between a microorganism and the disease it causes.
Those postulates have NEVER been demonstrated for ANY virus at any time, over 100+ years, even with acne, something that was 'known' as the cause of pimples for a long time.
Common sense on this issue is carried over from what was 'common sense' in the later 1800s.
No, not 'nothing' making people sick as much as bacteria and viruses are not what we are told. The terrain theory places bacteria as a way to 'eat' dead cells so that toxicity doesn't' spread through the body. It also puts viruses as cells who were damaged and self-destruct which gives the appearance under a microscope of the virus 'blowing out' a contaminated cell.
This debate was going on in the time of Louis Pasteur, who argued that germs were infecting people and causing illness whereas the competing terrain theory was suggesting that bacteria and viruses cannot exist in a healthy environment and are actually part of the process of bringing the body back to a baseline.
Bro you don't need to tell us all that stuff. We KNOW the mainstream science, ok? We used to think the exact same thing as you. Telling us what we used to think, to dissuade us from the new knowledge that we've graduated to, is not going to "convince" us to come back down to kindergarten. We noticed a million contradictions in the mainstream theory that you have not yet noticed. But... maybe you soon will.