"Flat Earth" is likely a CIA psyop to cover up/misdirect from this information:
We may not be rotating (see Toroidal Electromagetic Attractive Field and how it would behave identically to "gravity" on a sphere); It may be the EM Field rotating.
Earth is a shell subject to expansion when hit with large amounts of external energy (tectonic plate theory is cover for outer shell size expansion. Put paper meche on a balloon, then blow it up while it is encased in the paper-meche. You get cracks and ridges, just like the Earth).
Both the sun and moon appear to be closer than reported by NASA, possibly the same distance, and the same size as each other (explains the perfect eclipses more easily than they are at exactly the right distances with their different sizes for that to happen)
I am still trying to figure out the truth, but if you observe the angle of the sun's rays, a sun 93M miles away would have all rays almost parallel to each other. This is not the case, and it is visible even in space (see Japan's recent moon mission photos), so it is not the atmosphere difracting the rays as NASA BS narrative goes.
I do not. This is what I was able to assemble as my own "combined" theory of all the stuff that doesn't make any sense to me. The Toroidal EM Attractive Field has been mentioned in some of the Inner Earth discussion as people try to explain how people could exist on both sides of the crust with the inner being "updside down". It appears possible to me and might also explain the "primary water reservoir" hit by the Libyans under the Sahara. They may have actually hit the "inner ocean" (speculation). Toroidal shape is seen in the growth of many fruits, including the apple (see cross-section); Is it possible that they grow that way because of the nature of the Earth's EM field?
The sun/moon size/movements/tracking is actually explained in the Flat Earth Theory, so that part of the FET may actually be correct.
The expanding Earth shell makes sense if one assume the Earth used to be smaller with all continents closer together and it was the Earth's shell expansion, not "tectonic theory" that caused Pangea to turn into today's continent locations. This also works with the Toroidal EM AF theory (1), and would be driven by energy from a much closer sun (2). So there are some clues for you.
It is also possible that the Earth diameter is superhuge and we are in a bowl under a dome on just one part of it (fishbowl prison dome theory...lol) on a SuperEarth (spheroid). A discrete area of a large sphere always appears “flat” or nearly so with very small curvature.
Look, the sun is 93 million miles away. It has been measured by trigonometry and verified with orbital mechanics. We have sent probes around it. Why don't you get with the 17th century at least and catch up?
Suspicious. Why 93, a known cabal number combination? Too many symbology giveaways to be coincidence. 90deg minus 23.4deg Earth axis tilt = 66.6deg? Really? C’mon dude.
They ARE almost parallel. You just don't understand the implications of "almost." Or single-point perspective. (A sun 93 million miles away would have rays going in all directions. The question is "how parallel?" Can you figure out the number?)
Calculating the spectrum of angles that the rays of a sun of given size at a given distance, hitting the earth at any given location is trivial mathematics. You can let go of the assumption that people who wonder about a flat earth can’t calculate anything that you can, especially such simple things as trigonometry and calculus. You are just hopeful to be speaking with someone who doesn’t understand ‘the implications of almost’. Wow what a mind bending topic we just can’t wrap our heads around the ‘implications of almost’.
So what are you trying to say? You are "almost" understandable. You call it "trivial mathematics," which is usually a cover for your inability to do it. Or you would come up with some mathematical demonstration...which you can't.
The fact is that all light rays from the sun radiate from the sun, and that radiation (spreading out in angular space) will be visible in the sky as well as anywhere, because we are looking up the cone of light from the sun, which is a tremendous foreshortening of the visual geometry. Since there is no other way it can work, you don't have anything. If the sun were closer, we would see and measure the difference. Doesn't happen.
A closer sun with varying angles of rays might give the appearance of large curvature. The misattribution of the reason for something to explain a lie is a classic cabal tactic. They actually spend a lot of time constructing all the details of their “lies” to make the explanation sound believable. Then they buy ther services of “experts” and “scientists” to aggressively push, then cap it off with continuous media and public school reinforcement.
Start with the assumption that all information taught in public school is an outright lie or intended to mislead. This is how we know the sun is NOT 93M miles away. It is part of the cabal talking points, therefore it is known to be false with high certainty.
Then I will cheerfully start with the assumption that everything you say is a lie. It certainly fits the facts.
You talk a nice story, but it is only a story. What a head trip, being able to denounce everything known by mankind as a lie...and only you know the truth. In earlier times, people like you fancied they were Napoleon Bonaparte and we locked them in asylums.
"Flat Earth" is likely a CIA psyop to cover up/misdirect from this information:
I am still trying to figure out the truth, but if you observe the angle of the sun's rays, a sun 93M miles away would have all rays almost parallel to each other. This is not the case, and it is visible even in space (see Japan's recent moon mission photos), so it is not the atmosphere difracting the rays as NASA BS narrative goes.
Do you know of a summary video about this theory?
I do not. This is what I was able to assemble as my own "combined" theory of all the stuff that doesn't make any sense to me. The Toroidal EM Attractive Field has been mentioned in some of the Inner Earth discussion as people try to explain how people could exist on both sides of the crust with the inner being "updside down". It appears possible to me and might also explain the "primary water reservoir" hit by the Libyans under the Sahara. They may have actually hit the "inner ocean" (speculation). Toroidal shape is seen in the growth of many fruits, including the apple (see cross-section); Is it possible that they grow that way because of the nature of the Earth's EM field?
The sun/moon size/movements/tracking is actually explained in the Flat Earth Theory, so that part of the FET may actually be correct.
The expanding Earth shell makes sense if one assume the Earth used to be smaller with all continents closer together and it was the Earth's shell expansion, not "tectonic theory" that caused Pangea to turn into today's continent locations. This also works with the Toroidal EM AF theory (1), and would be driven by energy from a much closer sun (2). So there are some clues for you.
Ok I’ll keep an eye out for more info regarding that.
It is also possible that the Earth diameter is superhuge and we are in a bowl under a dome on just one part of it (fishbowl prison dome theory...lol) on a SuperEarth (spheroid). A discrete area of a large sphere always appears “flat” or nearly so with very small curvature.
Look, the sun is 93 million miles away. It has been measured by trigonometry and verified with orbital mechanics. We have sent probes around it. Why don't you get with the 17th century at least and catch up?
Suspicious. Why 93, a known cabal number combination? Too many symbology giveaways to be coincidence. 90deg minus 23.4deg Earth axis tilt = 66.6deg? Really? C’mon dude.
They ARE almost parallel. You just don't understand the implications of "almost." Or single-point perspective. (A sun 93 million miles away would have rays going in all directions. The question is "how parallel?" Can you figure out the number?)
Calculating the spectrum of angles that the rays of a sun of given size at a given distance, hitting the earth at any given location is trivial mathematics. You can let go of the assumption that people who wonder about a flat earth can’t calculate anything that you can, especially such simple things as trigonometry and calculus. You are just hopeful to be speaking with someone who doesn’t understand ‘the implications of almost’. Wow what a mind bending topic we just can’t wrap our heads around the ‘implications of almost’.
So what are you trying to say? You are "almost" understandable. You call it "trivial mathematics," which is usually a cover for your inability to do it. Or you would come up with some mathematical demonstration...which you can't.
The fact is that all light rays from the sun radiate from the sun, and that radiation (spreading out in angular space) will be visible in the sky as well as anywhere, because we are looking up the cone of light from the sun, which is a tremendous foreshortening of the visual geometry. Since there is no other way it can work, you don't have anything. If the sun were closer, we would see and measure the difference. Doesn't happen.
A closer sun with varying angles of rays might give the appearance of large curvature. The misattribution of the reason for something to explain a lie is a classic cabal tactic. They actually spend a lot of time constructing all the details of their “lies” to make the explanation sound believable. Then they buy ther services of “experts” and “scientists” to aggressively push, then cap it off with continuous media and public school reinforcement.
Start with the assumption that all information taught in public school is an outright lie or intended to mislead. This is how we know the sun is NOT 93M miles away. It is part of the cabal talking points, therefore it is known to be false with high certainty.
Then I will cheerfully start with the assumption that everything you say is a lie. It certainly fits the facts.
You talk a nice story, but it is only a story. What a head trip, being able to denounce everything known by mankind as a lie...and only you know the truth. In earlier times, people like you fancied they were Napoleon Bonaparte and we locked them in asylums.