So while scientists have been verifying this stuff for thousands of years, you’re going to go with “apparently they made it up” without even verifying it?
This is exactly the problem. The “experts” and “scientists” say it is so, therefore “do not question”. Exhibits top down hierarchical control and supression of questioning (anti-human AND anti-science) rather than easily explainable and logical conclusion. Thus, suspicious.
Sure there are plenty of non-scientists who defer and don’t question because they assume the scientists are right, but the problem is that many of people questioning established science these days barely understand the basic concepts.
What is the “easily explainable and logical conclusion” if not the one put forth in this video?
I love alternate theories, but they still have to stand up to scrutiny. Claiming it’s suspicious just because it’s “science” is pretty dumb.
It is easily explainable and logical. The problem is that some people object to learning facts that are contrary to their presupposed "common sense." (Do heavy objects fall faster than light objects? Galileo wants to know.)
So you’re going to go with that broken record comment that everyone who is afraid to investigate says? Bro, I AM verifying it. You’re watching me in the process of verifying it. And for the entire time I investigate this and every other tough to swallow consideration, I have to listen to people like you say your unthinking programmed comments on repeat. And I’ll happily do it.
Sagan the satanist wants to begile you with Science.
Wouldn't be surprised if they made up the entire story.
Apparently they made up Eratosthenes, though I haven’t verified that for myself.
So while scientists have been verifying this stuff for thousands of years, you’re going to go with “apparently they made it up” without even verifying it?
This is exactly the problem. The “experts” and “scientists” say it is so, therefore “do not question”. Exhibits top down hierarchical control and supression of questioning (anti-human AND anti-science) rather than easily explainable and logical conclusion. Thus, suspicious.
Sure there are plenty of non-scientists who defer and don’t question because they assume the scientists are right, but the problem is that many of people questioning established science these days barely understand the basic concepts.
What is the “easily explainable and logical conclusion” if not the one put forth in this video?
I love alternate theories, but they still have to stand up to scrutiny. Claiming it’s suspicious just because it’s “science” is pretty dumb.
A broken clock can be right twice in a day. Also the boy who cried "Wolf!" did tell the truth once.
It is easily explainable and logical. The problem is that some people object to learning facts that are contrary to their presupposed "common sense." (Do heavy objects fall faster than light objects? Galileo wants to know.)
So you’re going to go with that broken record comment that everyone who is afraid to investigate says? Bro, I AM verifying it. You’re watching me in the process of verifying it. And for the entire time I investigate this and every other tough to swallow consideration, I have to listen to people like you say your unthinking programmed comments on repeat. And I’ll happily do it.
Great! Get back to me when you’re done verifying this and I’ll take you seriously.
There's absolutely no record of him ever existing until they made him up in the eighties or whatever.
Hard to prove when references go back to the 1st century (see above post).
"There's absolutely no record..." Don't you have any embarrassment at making such a boner?
They make up the history, let alone the science. It's not even a stretch to assume they do this with 90% of everything.